Sedlaček Marko, Klančnik Grega, Nagode Aleš, Burja Jaka
Institute of Metals and Technology, Lepi Pot 11, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Prolabor d.o.o., Podvin 20, 3310 Žalec, Slovenia.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 8;14(24):7518. doi: 10.3390/ma14247518.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of austempering compared to quenching and low-temperature tempering on wear resistance of an as-cast medium carbon high-silicon steel intended for rock breaking. Austempering was done by isothermal holding at 270, 300 and 350 °C in molten salt baths, while quenching was done in water. The austempering treatments resulted in microstructural combinations of bainite and martensite. The isothermal holding at 270 °C resulted in bainite and self-tempered martensite, while isothermal holdings at 300 and 350 °C resulted in bainite and untempered martensite. The two quench and temper treatments resulted in tempered martensite. In general austempering resulted in lower hardness values when compared to quenching and tempering but higher impact toughness. The wear resistance was best for quenching and low temperature tempering, followed by austempering at 270 °C, but at slightly lower hardness and 25% higher impact toughness. The other two austempering treatments resulted in worse wear resistance.
本研究的目的是评估等温淬火与淬火及低温回火相比,对一种用于岩石破碎的铸态中碳高硅钢耐磨性的影响。等温淬火是在盐浴中于270、300和350℃等温保持,而淬火是在水中进行。等温淬火处理产生了贝氏体和马氏体的微观组织组合。在270℃等温保持产生了贝氏体和自回火马氏体,而在300和350℃等温保持产生了贝氏体和未回火马氏体。两种淬火和回火处理产生了回火马氏体。总体而言,与淬火和回火相比,等温淬火导致硬度值较低,但冲击韧性较高。耐磨性最好的是淬火和低温回火,其次是270℃的等温淬火,但硬度略低,冲击韧性高25%。另外两种等温淬火处理导致耐磨性较差。