• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些非药物初级保健干预措施可减少常见精神健康障碍的不平等?一项针对定量和定性研究的系统评价议定书。

Which Non-Pharmaceutical Primary Care Interventions Reduce Inequalities in Common Mental Health Disorders? A Protocol for a Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies.

机构信息

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 8PB, UK.

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) for the North-East and North Cumbria (NENC), Newcastle Upon Tyne NE3 3XT, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 9;18(24):12978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412978.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182412978
PMID:34948587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8701146/
Abstract

Common mental health disorders (CMDs) represent a major public health concern and are particularly prevalent in people experiencing disadvantage or marginalisation. Primary care is the first point of contact for people with CMDs. Pharmaceutical interventions, such as antidepressants, are commonly used in the treatment of CMDs; however, there is concern that these treatments are over-prescribed and ineffective for treating mental distress related to social conditions. Non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions, such as psychological therapies and "social prescribing", provide alternatives for CMDs. Little is known, however, about which such interventions reduce social inequalities in CMD-related outcomes, and which may, unintentionally, increase them. The aim of this protocol (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021281166) is to describe how we will undertake a systematic review to assess the effects of non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions on CMD-related outcomes and social inequalities. A systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods primary studies will be undertaken and reported according to the PRISMA-Equity guidance. The following databases will be searched: Assia, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsycInfo and Scopus. Retrieved records will be screened according to pre-defined eligibility criteria and synthesised using a narrative approach, with meta-analysis if feasible. The findings of this review will guide efforts to commission more equitable mental health services.

摘要

常见精神健康障碍(CMDs)是一个主要的公共卫生关注点,在处于劣势或边缘化的人群中尤为普遍。初级保健是 CMD 患者的第一接触点。药物干预,如抗抑郁药,常用于 CMD 的治疗;然而,人们担心这些治疗方法被过度开具,并且对治疗与社会条件相关的精神困扰无效。非药物性初级保健干预措施,如心理疗法和“社会处方”,为 CMD 提供了替代方案。然而,对于哪些干预措施可以减少 CMD 相关结果的社会不平等,以及哪些干预措施可能无意中加剧这些不平等,人们知之甚少。本方案(PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42021281166)旨在描述我们将如何进行系统评价,以评估非药物性初级保健干预措施对 CMD 相关结果和社会不平等的影响。将对定量、定性和混合方法的原始研究进行系统评价,并根据 PRISMA-Equity 指南进行报告。将搜索以下数据库:Assia、CINAHL、Embase、Medline、PsycInfo 和 Scopus。根据预先定义的资格标准筛选检索到的记录,并使用叙述性方法进行综合,如果可行的话,还将进行荟萃分析。本综述的结果将指导努力委托更公平的精神卫生服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f9/8701146/028bb0fa679c/ijerph-18-12978-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f9/8701146/028bb0fa679c/ijerph-18-12978-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f9/8701146/028bb0fa679c/ijerph-18-12978-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Which Non-Pharmaceutical Primary Care Interventions Reduce Inequalities in Common Mental Health Disorders? A Protocol for a Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies.哪些非药物初级保健干预措施可减少常见精神健康障碍的不平等?一项针对定量和定性研究的系统评价议定书。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 9;18(24):12978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412978.
2
Experiences of Non-Pharmaceutical Primary Care Interventions for Common Mental Health Disorders in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Groups: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.社会经济弱势群体常见精神健康障碍的非药物初级保健干预措施的经验:定性研究的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 23;20(7):5237. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075237.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions to improve mental health in deprived populations: a systematic review.针对贫困人群改善心理健康的非药物初级保健干预措施:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Mar 30;73(729):e242-e248. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0343. Print 2023 Apr.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Tackling inequalities in obesity: a protocol for a systematic review of the effectiveness of public health interventions at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in obesity among adults.解决肥胖不平等问题:一项系统评价公共卫生干预措施减少成年人肥胖社会经济不平等的有效性的方案。
Syst Rev. 2013 May 10;2:27. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-27.
7
An overview of systematic reviews on mental health promotion, prevention, and treatment of common mental disorders for refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced persons.关于难民、寻求庇护者和境内流离失所者常见精神障碍的心理健康促进、预防和治疗的系统评价概述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 4;9(9):CD013458. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013458.pub2.
8
Interventions for adults with a history of complex traumatic events: the INCiTE mixed-methods systematic review.干预成年人创伤后复杂经历:INCiTE 混合方法系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(43):1-312. doi: 10.3310/hta24430.
9
Advancing mental health equality: a mapping review of interventions, economic evaluations and barriers and facilitators.推进心理健康公平:干预措施、经济评估以及障碍和促进因素的映射综述。
Syst Rev. 2020 May 26;9(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01333-6.
10
A Systematic Review of Inequalities in the Mental Health Experiences of Black African, Black Caribbean and Black-mixed UK Populations: Implications for Action.一项关于英国黑非洲人、黑加勒比人和混血人群心理健康体验不平等的系统评价:对行动的启示。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Aug;10(4):1669-1681. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01352-0. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
An evidence map of clinical practice guideline recommendations and quality of non-pharmaceutical interventions for post-stroke emotional disorders.中风后情绪障碍的临床实践指南建议及非药物干预质量的证据图谱。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 9;16:1580799. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1580799. eCollection 2025.
2
Experiences of Non-Pharmaceutical Primary Care Interventions for Common Mental Health Disorders in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Groups: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.社会经济弱势群体常见精神健康障碍的非药物初级保健干预措施的经验:定性研究的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 23;20(7):5237. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075237.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating task-sharing psychological treatments within primary health care services: Systems considerations.将任务分担式心理治疗整合到初级卫生保健服务中:系统考量
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2021 Jul;26(3):149-150. doi: 10.1177/13558196211013847.
2
Trends and variation in antidepressant prescribing in English primary care: a retrospective longitudinal study.英国初级医疗中抗抑郁药处方的趋势与变化:一项回顾性纵向研究
BJGP Open. 2021 Aug 24;5(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0020. Print 2021 Aug.
3
Which are the intermediate determinants of gender inequalities in mental health?: A scoping review.
Non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions to improve mental health in deprived populations: a systematic review.
针对贫困人群改善心理健康的非药物初级保健干预措施:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Mar 30;73(729):e242-e248. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0343. Print 2023 Apr.
4
Nurses' Motivations, Barriers, and Facilitators to Engage in a Peer Review Process: A Qualitative Study Protocol.护士参与同行评审过程的动机、障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究方案
Nurs Rep. 2023 Feb 22;13(1):307-314. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13010029.
心理健康方面性别不平等的中间决定因素有哪些?一项范围综述。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;67(8):1005-1025. doi: 10.1177/00207640211015708. Epub 2021 May 13.
4
Interventions to reduce inequalities in avoidable hospital admissions: explanatory framework and systematic review protocol.减少可避免住院治疗不平等的干预措施:解释框架和系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 23;10(7):e035429. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035429.
5
Predictors of antidepressant use in the English population: analysis of the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey.英国人群中抗抑郁药使用的预测因素:成人精神病患病率调查分析
Ir J Psychol Med. 2020 Mar;37(1):15-23. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2018.19. Epub 2018 May 24.
6
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): psychometric properties of the online Spanish version in a clinical sample with emotional disorders.正性负性情绪量表(PANAS):在线西班牙语版在伴有情绪障碍的临床样本中的心理测量学特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2472-1.
7
Social prescribing.社会处方
BMJ. 2019 Mar 28;364:l1285. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1285.
8
Development and validation of a search filter to identify equity-focused studies: reducing the number needed to screen.开发和验证一种用于识别以公平为重点的研究的搜索筛选器:减少需要筛选的数量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Oct 12;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0567-x.
9
Men's work, Women's work, and mental health: A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between the gender composition of occupations and mental health.男性工作、女性工作与心理健康:职业性别构成与心理健康关系的纵向研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 May;204:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
10
Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations.简短酒精干预措施在初级保健人群中的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 24;2(2):CD004148. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004148.pub4.