Department of Communication Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 17;18(24):13298. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413298.
The COVID-19 disease outbreak has seen mixed information flows comprising top-down communication from health authorities to the public and citizen-to-citizen communication. This study aimed to identify mechanisms underlying the sharing of official versus unofficial information during the outbreak. Survey findings based on a nationally representative U.S. sample (N = 856) showed that individuals' predispositions affected their information consumption and affective experiences, leading to distinct types of information-sharing behaviors. While anger toward the U.S. government's outbreak response was directly associated with unofficial information sharing, anxiety was directly associated with official information sharing. These findings enhance our understanding of the propagation of different kinds of pandemic information and provide implications for public education on information verification based on source authoritativeness.
COVID-19 疾病爆发期间,信息传播呈现出复杂多样的特点,包括自上而下的卫生部门向公众发布的信息以及民众之间的信息交流。本研究旨在确定在此次疫情爆发期间,官方信息和非官方信息传播的背后机制。基于全美代表性样本(N=856)的调查结果显示,个体的倾向会影响他们对信息的获取和情感体验,进而导致不同类型的信息分享行为。对美国政府疫情应对措施的愤怒情绪与非官方信息分享直接相关,而焦虑情绪则与官方信息分享直接相关。这些发现增进了我们对不同类型大流行病信息传播的理解,并为基于信息来源权威性的信息核实提供了公共教育方面的启示。