Stan Richards School of Advertising and Public Relations, University of Texas at Austin.
Department of Business and Economics, West Virginia State University.
Health Commun. 2022 Nov;37(13):1671-1681. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1912948. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
The global pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) poses serious health risks to humans; yet, despite recommendations by governments and health organizations, a significant number of Americans are not engaging in preventive behaviors. To understand and explain this phenomenon, we seek guidance from a theoretical model that merges the risk information seeking and processing model and the theory of planned behavior. Furthermore, given the politicized nature of the pandemic in the U.S., we pose different information seeking patterns according to media partisanship, asserting that partisanship is likely to affect cognitive structures regarding COVID-19 decision making. Our results suggest two distinct routes for information seeking to decision-making. Conservative media use is directly associated with preventive behavior avoidance, while liberal media use is indirectly associated with preventive behavior engagement. This work contributes to our collective understanding of what drives preventive behaviors in the context of health risk, particularly in the case of a highly politicized national health crisis with global implications.
由 SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19)引起的全球大流行对人类健康构成严重威胁;然而,尽管各国政府和卫生组织提出了建议,但仍有相当数量的美国人没有采取预防措施。为了理解和解释这一现象,我们从一个将风险信息寻求和处理模型与计划行为理论相结合的理论模型中寻求指导。此外,鉴于该大流行在美国的政治化性质,我们根据媒体党派立场提出了不同的信息寻求模式,断言党派立场可能会影响与 COVID-19 决策相关的认知结构。我们的研究结果表明,信息寻求有两条截然不同的途径通向决策。保守派媒体的使用与预防行为的回避直接相关,而自由派媒体的使用与预防行为的参与则间接相关。这项工作有助于我们共同理解在健康风险背景下是什么驱动了预防行为,特别是在涉及具有全球影响的高度政治化的国家卫生危机的情况下。