Suppr超能文献

来源信任与 COVID-19 信息共享:情绪和关于共享的信念的中介作用。

Source Trust and COVID-19 Information Sharing: The Mediating Roles of Emotions and Beliefs About Sharing.

机构信息

Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Behav. 2021 Apr;48(2):132-139. doi: 10.1177/1090198120984760. Epub 2020 Dec 24.

Abstract

Health information sharing has become especially important during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic because people need to learn about the disease and then act accordingly. This study examines the perceived trust of different COVID-19 information sources (health professionals, academic institutions, government agencies, news media, social media, family, and friends) and sharing of COVID-19 information in China. Specifically, it investigates how beliefs about sharing and emotions mediate the effects of perceived source trust on source-specific information sharing intentions. Results suggest that health professionals, academic institutions, and government agencies are trusted sources of information and that people share information from these sources because they think doing so will increase disease awareness and promote disease prevention. People may also choose to share COVID-19 information from news media, social media, and family as they cope with anxiety, anger, and fear. Taken together, a better understanding of the distinct psychological mechanisms underlying health information sharing from different sources can help contribute to more effective sharing of information about COVID-19 prevention and to manage negative emotion contagion during the pandemic.

摘要

健康信息共享在 COVID-19(2019 年冠状病毒病)大流行期间变得尤为重要,因为人们需要了解疾病,然后采取相应的行动。本研究考察了中国公众对不同 COVID-19 信息来源(卫生专业人员、学术机构、政府机构、新闻媒体、社交媒体、家庭和朋友)的信任程度以及 COVID-19 信息的共享情况。具体而言,它调查了关于共享的信念和情绪如何调节感知来源信任对特定来源信息共享意图的影响。研究结果表明,卫生专业人员、学术机构和政府机构是值得信赖的信息来源,人们之所以分享这些来源的信息,是因为他们认为这样做可以提高对疾病的认识,促进疾病预防。人们也可能选择分享新闻媒体、社交媒体和家庭的 COVID-19 信息,以应对焦虑、愤怒和恐惧。总之,更好地理解不同来源健康信息共享背后的独特心理机制,可以帮助人们更有效地共享 COVID-19 预防信息,并在大流行期间管理负面情绪的传播。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Cancer information seekers in china: a preliminary profile.中国癌症信息寻求者:初步概况。
J Health Commun. 2015;20(5):616-26. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1012244. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
4
Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks.通过社交网络的大规模情感传染的实验证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 17;111(24):8788-90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320040111. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
5
Arousal increases social transmission of information.唤醒增加信息的社会传播。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jul;22(7):891-3. doi: 10.1177/0956797611413294. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
7
Cancer information scanning and seeking in the general population.一般人群的癌症信息扫描和寻求。
J Health Commun. 2010 Oct;15(7):734-53. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.514029.
8
Lasting false beliefs and their behavioral consequences.持久的错误信念及其行为后果。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Aug;19(8):749-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02151.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验