Suppr超能文献

药剂师作为可及的医疗保健提供者:量化机会。

Pharmacists as accessible health care providers: quantifying the opportunity.

机构信息

UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jan;28(1):85-90. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.1.85.

Abstract

Community pharmacists are well positioned to improve patient access to care, which may assist value-based care programs in reaching patients. While pharmacy accessibility is broadly acknowledged, much of the research supporting accessibility claims is poor quality. To quantify the accessibility of pharmacists in comparison with physicians or qualified health care professionals (QHP) in a commercially insured population. IBM MarketScan claims data from 2018 were used for this cross-sectional study. Beneficiaries included in the primary analysis were aged 18-64 years, enrolled with pharmacy benefits in 2018 for 12 months, and had at least 1 valid prescription drug claim or evaluation and management (E&M) code in 2018. Unique pharmacy visits were defined using a 6-day fill window for prescription fill dates, while visits to physicians or other QHP were defined as unique service dates tied to an E&M code. We assessed differences in visit frequency for the full sample, those with multiple chronic conditions (MCC), and "superutilizers" (top 5% based on total cost of care). Our statistical approach included descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon sign rank test. After applying the inclusion criteria, 11,720,958 beneficiaries were included in the full sample. The MCC cohort contained 13.8% of the total sample (mean [SD] age: 50.8 [10.8]; 908,880 [56.1%] female). Finally, the superutilizers were 57.3% female with an average age of 48.4 years and comprised 5.3% of the total sample. The median number of pharmacy and physician or QHP visits for the full sample were 5 and 3 ( < 0.0001), yielding a pharmacy to physician or QHP visit ratio of 1.7:1. The MCC cohort had a median of 13 pharmacy visits and 7 physician or QHP visits (ratio 1.9:1; < 0.0001), and the superutilizers had a median of 14 pharmacy visits and 9 physician or QHP visits (ratio 1.6:1; < 0.0001). This study found that patients visit their community pharmacies almost twice as often as they visit their physicians or other QHP. Study findings emphasize the accessibility of community pharmacists and highlight the role of community pharmacists in improving patient engagement in all care programs, including value-based care programs. The database infrastructure used for this project was funded by the Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina (UNC) Gillings School of Global Public Health; the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC; the CER Strategic Initiative of UNC's Clinical Translational Science Award (UL1TR001111); and the UNC School of Medicine. All authors are employed by the UNC School of Pharmacy. Urick declares consulting fees from Cardinal Health. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Portions of this work were previously presented at the AMCP 2021 Virtual, April 12-16, 2021.

摘要

社区药剂师在改善患者获得护理方面具有得天独厚的优势,这可能有助于基于价值的护理计划接触到患者。尽管药房的可及性已得到广泛认可,但支持可及性主张的大部分研究质量都很差。 为了定量比较药剂师相对于医生或合格医疗保健专业人员(QHP)在商业保险人群中的可及性。 本横断面研究使用了来自 2018 年 IBM MarketScan 的索赔数据。主要分析中包括年龄在 18-64 岁之间的受益人的数据,他们在 2018 年参加了为期 12 个月的药房福利计划,并且在 2018 年至少有一次有效的处方药索赔或评估和管理(E&M)代码。使用为期 6 天的配药窗口来定义独特的药房就诊日期,而医生或其他 QHP 的就诊日期则与 E&M 代码相关联。我们评估了全样本、患有多种慢性疾病(MCC)的样本和“超级用户”(基于总护理成本的前 5%)的就诊频率差异。我们的统计方法包括描述性统计和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验。 在应用纳入标准后,共有 11720958 名受益人参选了全样本。MCC 队列包含总样本的 13.8%(平均[标准差]年龄:50.8[10.8];908880[56.1%]为女性)。最后,超级用户中 57.3%为女性,平均年龄为 48.4 岁,占总样本的 5.3%。全样本中药房和医生或 QHP 就诊的中位数分别为 5 次和 3 次(<0.0001),这使得药房与医生或 QHP 就诊的比例为 1.7:1。MCC 队列的中位数为 13 次药房就诊和 7 次医生或 QHP 就诊(比例为 1.9:1;<0.0001),超级用户的中位数为 14 次药房就诊和 9 次医生或 QHP 就诊(比例为 1.6:1;<0.0001)。 本研究发现,患者到社区药房就诊的频率几乎是到医生或其他 QHP 就诊的两倍。研究结果强调了社区药剂师的可及性,并突出了社区药剂师在改善所有护理计划(包括基于价值的护理计划)中患者参与度方面的作用。 该项目使用的数据库基础设施由北卡罗来纳大学(UNC)全球公共卫生学院流行病学系、UNC 的 Cecil G. Sheps 卫生服务研究中心、UNC 的 CER 战略倡议、UNC 的临床转化科学奖(UL1TR001111)以及 UNC 医学院资助。所有作者均受雇于 UNC 药学院。Urick 宣布收取 Cardinal Health 的咨询费。其他作者没有利益冲突需要披露。这项工作的部分内容以前在 2021 年 4 月 12 日至 16 日举行的 AMCP 2021 虚拟会议上进行了介绍。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Design and effect of performance-based pharmacy payment models.基于绩效的药房支付模式的设计与效果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Mar;27(3):306-315. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.306.
4
What Was, Is No More: Community Pharmacy Economics.已成过往:社区药房经济学。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jun;26(6):703-705. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.6.703.
9
Effect of comorbidity on injury outcomes: a review of existing indices.合并症对损伤结局的影响:现有指标的综述。
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;36:5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验