Douhard Frédéric, Douhard Mathieu, Gilbert Hélène, Monget Philippe, Gaillard Jean-Michel, Lemaître Jean-François
GenPhySE INRAE ENVT Université de Toulouse Castanet-Tolosan France.
Laboratoire de Biométrie & Biologie Evolutive CNRS UMR 5558 Université Lyon 1 Villeurbanne France.
Evol Appl. 2021 Nov 28;14(12):2726-2749. doi: 10.1111/eva.13320. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Trade-offs between life history traits are expected to occur due to the limited amount of resources that organisms can obtain and share among biological functions, but are of least concern for selection responses in nutrient-rich or benign environments. In domestic animals, selection limits have not yet been reached despite strong selection for higher meat, milk or egg yields. Yet, negative genetic correlations between productivity traits and health or fertility traits have often been reported, supporting the view that trade-offs do occur in the context of nonlimiting resources. The importance of allocation mechanisms in limiting genetic changes can thus be questioned when animals are mostly constrained by their time to acquire and process energy rather than by feed availability. Selection for high productivity traits early in life should promote a fast metabolism with less energy allocated to self-maintenance (contributing to soma preservation and repair). Consequently, the capacity to breed shortly after an intensive period of production or to remain healthy should be compromised. We assessed those predictions in mammalian and avian livestock and related laboratory model species. First, we surveyed studies that compared energy allocation to maintenance between breeds or lines of contrasting productivity but found little support for the occurrence of an energy allocation trade-off. Second, selection experiments for lower feed intake per unit of product (i.e. higher feed efficiency) generally resulted in reduced allocation to maintenance, but this did not entail fitness costs in terms of survival or future reproduction. These findings indicate that the consequences of a particular selection in domestic animals are much more difficult to predict than one could anticipate from the energy allocation framework alone. Future developments to predict the contribution of time constraints and trade-offs to selection limits will be insightful to breed livestock in increasingly challenging environments.
由于生物体可获取并在各种生物学功能间分配的资源量有限,预计生命史特征之间会出现权衡取舍,但在营养丰富或良性的环境中,这对于选择反应而言最不值得担忧。在家畜中,尽管对提高肉、奶或蛋产量进行了强烈选择,但尚未达到选择极限。然而,生产力性状与健康或繁殖力性状之间经常出现负遗传相关性,这支持了在资源非限制性的情况下确实会发生权衡取舍的观点。因此,当动物主要受获取和处理能量的时间限制而非饲料供应限制时,分配机制在限制遗传变化方面的重要性就可能受到质疑。在生命早期选择高生产力性状应会促进快速代谢,分配到自我维持(有助于体细胞保存和修复)的能量减少。因此,在高强度生产期后不久繁殖的能力或保持健康的能力可能会受到损害。我们在哺乳动物和禽类家畜以及相关实验室模型物种中评估了这些预测。首先,我们调查了比较不同生产力的品种或品系之间维持能量分配的研究,但几乎没有找到支持能量分配权衡取舍发生的证据。其次,针对单位产品较低采食量(即较高饲料效率)的选择实验通常会导致维持能量分配减少,但这在生存或未来繁殖方面并未带来适应性成本。这些发现表明,家畜中特定选择的后果比仅从能量分配框架中预期的要难预测得多。预测时间限制和权衡取舍对选择极限的贡献的未来发展,对于在日益具有挑战性的环境中培育家畜将具有重要意义。