Suppr超能文献

男性竞技跑步运动员和公路自行车运动员的特定部位骨骼差异与能量状态

Site-Specific Bone Differences and Energy Status in Male Competitive Runners and Road Cyclists.

作者信息

Chen Zhaojing, Sherk Vanessa D, Sharma-Ghimire Pragya, Bemben Michael G, Bemben Debra A

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, California State University, San Bernardino, CA, USA.

Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2022 Apr-Jun;25(2):150-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

Abstract

The interaction between mechanical loading and energy availability on bone health in male endurance athletes merits further investigation. The purpose of this study was to compare bone status in male competitive runners and road cyclists and to investigate the influence of energy availability (EA) on bone mineral density (BMD). 18 competitive runners and 19 road cyclists (20-50 years) participated in this study. Areal BMD and body composition were assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Volumetric bone variables at the 4% and 66% tibia sites were assessed by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Energy availability (EA, 7-day dietary and exercise logs) and resting metabolic rate (RMR, open circuit spirometry) were measured as indicators of energy status. Bone loading history, calcium intake, and training history were assessed by questionnaires. After adjusting for age, runners had significantly greater (p < 0.05) areal BMD (femoral neck, left total hip), Z-scores (total body, hips sites), total bone mineral content and trabecular variables (bone mineral content, volumetric BMD, bone strength index) at tibia 4% site, and total volumetric BMD at tibia 66% site than the cyclists (p ≤ 0.05). At the tibia 66% site, cyclists had significantly greater (p < 0.05) total area, periosteal circumference, endosteal circumference, and strength-strain index than runners. Energy variables were similar for runners and cyclists; however, RMR and RMR ratio (measured RMR/predicted RMR) were significantly lower in cyclists (p < 0.001). In conclusion, there were site-specific differences in hip and tibia bone characteristics between runners and cyclists. RMR was associated with several bone outcomes; however, EA was not related to bone health in runners or to dual energy x-ray absorptiometry bone variables in cyclists.

摘要

机械负荷与能量供应对男性耐力运动员骨骼健康的相互作用值得进一步研究。本研究的目的是比较男性竞技跑步者和公路自行车运动员的骨骼状况,并调查能量供应(EA)对骨密度(BMD)的影响。18名竞技跑步者和19名公路自行车运动员(20 - 50岁)参与了本研究。通过双能X线吸收法评估面积骨密度和身体成分。通过外周定量计算机断层扫描评估胫骨4%和66%部位的体积骨变量。测量能量供应(EA,7天饮食和运动记录)和静息代谢率(RMR,开路肺量计)作为能量状态指标。通过问卷评估骨骼负荷史、钙摄入量和训练史。在调整年龄后,跑步者在股骨颈、左侧全髋的面积骨密度、Z评分(全身、髋部部位)、总骨矿物质含量以及胫骨4%部位的小梁变量(骨矿物质含量、体积骨密度、骨强度指数)和胫骨66%部位的总体积骨密度均显著高于自行车运动员(p≤0.05)。在胫骨66%部位,自行车运动员的总面积、骨膜周长、骨髓腔周长和强度应变指数显著高于跑步者(p < 0.05)。跑步者和自行车运动员的能量变量相似;然而,自行车运动员的RMR和RMR比值(测量的RMR/预测的RMR)显著更低(p < 0.001)。总之,跑步者和自行车运动员在髋部和胫骨骨骼特征上存在部位特异性差异。RMR与多个骨骼指标相关;然而,EA与跑步者的骨骼健康或自行车运动员的双能X线吸收法骨变量无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验