Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Department for Sports and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, John Dalton Building, Chester Street, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK.
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Jul 3;13(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0486-9.
We examined bone density in older athletes and controls. Sprinters had greater hip and spine bone density than endurance athletes and controls, whereas values were similar in the latter two groups. These results could not be explained by differences in impact, muscle size or power between sprint and endurance athletes.
We examined the relationship between prolonged participation in regular sprint or endurance running and skeletal health at key clinical sites in older age, and the factors responsible for any associations which we observed.
We recruited 38 master sprint runners (28 males, 10 females, mean age 71 ± 7 years), 149 master endurance runners (111 males, 38 females, mean age 70 ± 6 years) and 59 non-athletic controls (29 males, 30 females, mean age 74 ± 5 years). Dual X-ray absorptiometry was used to assess hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD), body composition (lean and fat mass), whilst jump power was assessed with jumping mechanography. In athletes, vertical impacts were recorded over 7 days from a waist-worn accelerometer, and details of starting age, age-graded performance and training hours were recorded.
In ANOVA models adjusted for sex, age, height, body composition, and jump power, sprinter hip BMD was 10 and 14% greater than that of endurance runners and controls respectively. Sprinter spine BMD was also greater than that of both endurance runners and controls. There were no differences in hip or spine BMD between endurance runners and controls. Stepwise regression showed only discipline (sprint/endurance), sex, and age as predictors of athlete spine BMD, whilst these variables and starting age were predictive of hip BMD.
Regular running is associated with greater BMD at the fracture-prone hip and spine sites in master sprinters but not endurance runners. These benefits cannot be explained by indicators of mechanical loading measured in this study including vertical impacts, body composition or muscular output.
我们研究了老年运动员和对照组的骨密度。短跑运动员的髋部和脊柱骨密度高于耐力运动员和对照组,而后者两组的骨密度相似。这些结果不能用短跑和耐力运动员之间的冲击、肌肉大小或力量的差异来解释。
我们研究了长期参加常规短跑或耐力跑与老年时关键临床部位骨骼健康的关系,以及我们观察到的任何关联的原因。
我们招募了 38 名短跑大师(28 名男性,10 名女性,平均年龄 71±7 岁)、149 名耐力大师(111 名男性,38 名女性,平均年龄 70±6 岁)和 59 名非运动员对照组(29 名男性,30 名女性,平均年龄 74±5 岁)。双能 X 线吸收法用于评估髋部和脊柱骨矿物质密度(BMD)、身体成分(瘦体重和脂肪量),而跳跃力量则用跳跃力学仪评估。在运动员中,使用佩戴在腰部的加速度计在 7 天内记录垂直冲击,记录起始年龄、年龄分级表现和训练时间的详细信息。
在调整性别、年龄、身高、身体成分和跳跃力量的 ANOVA 模型中,短跑运动员的髋部 BMD 比耐力运动员和对照组分别高 10%和 14%。短跑运动员的脊柱 BMD 也高于耐力运动员和对照组。耐力运动员和对照组的髋部或脊柱 BMD 无差异。逐步回归显示,只有运动项目(短跑/耐力)、性别和年龄是运动员脊柱 BMD 的预测因素,而这些变量和起始年龄是髋部 BMD 的预测因素。
规律的跑步与大师级短跑运动员髋部和脊柱骨折部位的 BMD 增加有关,但与耐力运动员无关。这些益处不能用本研究中测量的机械负荷指标(包括垂直冲击、身体成分或肌肉输出)来解释。