Zheng W R, Yang X R, Sun J, Mu Y, Yan J, Yang H X
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 25;56(12):861-867. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210822-00458.
To investigate the effect of placenta previa attached to cesarean scar for adverse pregnant outcomes in patients with or without placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PAS). The clinical information of patients with cesarean section history and placenta previa during the perioperative period at Peking University First Hospital from January 1st, 2015 to December 31st, 2020 were collected retrospectively. There were 53 cases without PAS and 172 cases with PAS, 153 cases with abnormally invasive placenta (containing placenta increta and placenta percreta) and 72 cases without PAS or with placenta accreta. The pregnant outcomes including rate of postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, hysterectomy between the above groups were compared. Multivariate analysis was performed to study the factors significantly associated with PAS. Pregnant women with PAS were at higher risk of adverse pregnant outcomes than those without PAS. Patients with PAS had higher incidences of hysterectomy [12.2% (21/172) vs 0(0/53); =0.005], postpartum hemorrhage [60.5% (104/172) vs 5.7% (3/53); <0.01] and blood transfusion [66.9% (115/172) vs 7.5% (4/53); <0.01]. In the subgroup analysis stratified by the type of PAS, patients with abnormally invasive placenta were at higher risk of hysterectomy [13.7% (21/153) vs 0 (0/72); 0.01], postpartum hemorrhage [66.7% (102/153) vs 6.9% (5/72); ²70.873, <0.01] and blood transfusion [74.5% (114/153) vs 6.9% (5/72); ²90.869, <0.01]. After multiple logistic regression, the type of creta had the positive relation with postpartum hemorrhage (=27.622, 95%:9.87377.280; <0.01) and blood transfusion (=36.912, 95%:13.239102.922; <0.01). There were no significant correlations between adverse pregnant outcomes and the type of placenta previa or the times of cesarean section (all >0.01). Placenta previa attached to cesarean scar without PAS or with placenta accreta could not act as the factor of predicting adverse pregnant outcomes in clinic. Placenta previa attached to cesarean scar with placenta increta or placenta percreta could increase the risk of adverse pregnant outcomes.
探讨剖宫产瘢痕部位前置胎盘合并或不合并胎盘植入谱系疾病(PAS)对妊娠不良结局的影响。回顾性收集2015年1月1日至2020年12月31日在北京大学第一医院有剖宫产史且合并前置胎盘患者围手术期的临床资料。其中无PAS者53例,有PAS者172例,其中胎盘植入异常(包括胎盘植入和穿透性胎盘植入)153例,无PAS或有胎盘粘连者72例。比较上述各组间产后出血、输血、子宫切除率等妊娠结局。进行多因素分析以研究与PAS显著相关的因素。合并PAS的孕妇发生妊娠不良结局的风险高于未合并PAS者。PAS患者子宫切除发生率更高[12.2%(21/172) vs 0(0/53);P =0.005],产后出血发生率更高[60.5%(104/172) vs 5.7%(3/53);P<0.01],输血发生率更高[66.9%(115/172) vs 7.5%(4/53);P<0.01]。在按PAS类型分层的亚组分析中,胎盘植入异常患者子宫切除风险更高[13.7%(21/153) vs 0(0/72);P =0.01],产后出血发生率更高[66.7%(102/153) vs 6.9%(5/72);χ²=70.873,P<0.01],输血发生率更高[74.5%(114/153) vs 6.9%(5/72);χ²=90.869,P<0.01]。多因素logistic回归分析后,植入类型与产后出血(P =27.622,95%CI:9.87377.280;P<0.01)和输血(P =36.912,95%CI:13.239102.922;P<0.01)呈正相关。妊娠不良结局与前置胎盘类型或剖宫产次数均无显著相关性(均P>0.01)。剖宫产瘢痕部位前置胎盘不合并PAS或合并胎盘粘连不能作为临床预测妊娠不良结局的因素。剖宫产瘢痕部位前置胎盘合并胎盘植入或穿透性胎盘植入会增加妊娠不良结局的风险。