• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在系列回忆范式中,积极和消极情绪状态不会影响跨模态听觉分心。

Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm.

作者信息

Kaiser Saskia, Buchner Axel, Bell Raoul

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Dec 28;16(12):e0260699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260699. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0260699
PMID:34962933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8714099/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine whether positive and negative mood states affect auditory distraction in a serial-recall task. The duplex-mechanism account differentiates two types of auditory distraction. The changing-state effect is postulated to be rooted in interference-by-process and to be automatic. The auditory-deviant effect is attributed to attentional capture by the deviant distractors. Only the auditory-deviant effect, but not the changing-state effect, should be influenced by emotional mood states according to the duplex-mechanism account. Four experiments were conducted to test how auditory distraction is affected by emotional mood states. Mood was induced by autobiographical recall (Experiments 1 and 2) or the presentation of emotional pictures (Experiments 3 and 4). Even though the manipulations were successful in inducing changes in mood, neither positive mood (Experiments 1 and 3) nor negative mood (Experiments 2 and 4) had any effect on distraction despite large samples sizes (N = 851 in total). The results thus are not in line with the hypothesis that auditory distraction is affected by changes in mood state. The results support an automatic-capture account according to which the auditory-deviant effect and the changing-state effect are mainly stimulus-driven effects that are rooted in the automatic processing of the to-be-ignored auditory stream.

摘要

本研究的目的是检验在系列回忆任务中,积极和消极情绪状态是否会影响听觉分心。双重机制理论区分了两种类型的听觉分心。变化状态效应被假定源于过程干扰且是自动的。听觉偏差效应归因于偏差干扰物引起的注意捕获。根据双重机制理论,只有听觉偏差效应,而非变化状态效应,会受到情绪状态的影响。进行了四项实验来测试情绪状态如何影响听觉分心。情绪通过自传式回忆(实验1和2)或呈现情绪图片(实验3和4)来诱发。尽管这些操作成功地诱发了情绪变化,但无论是积极情绪(实验1和3)还是消极情绪(实验2和4),在样本量较大(总共N = 851)的情况下,对分心均无任何影响。因此,结果不符合情绪状态变化会影响听觉分心的假设。结果支持自动捕获理论,根据该理论,听觉偏差效应和变化状态效应主要是由刺激驱动的效应,源于对要忽略的听觉流的自动处理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/8714099/e9e53295601e/pone.0260699.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/8714099/40c02da7e240/pone.0260699.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/8714099/e0cc573501aa/pone.0260699.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/8714099/b09519401d06/pone.0260699.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/8714099/50691cee50fd/pone.0260699.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/8714099/e9e53295601e/pone.0260699.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/8714099/40c02da7e240/pone.0260699.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/8714099/e0cc573501aa/pone.0260699.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/8714099/b09519401d06/pone.0260699.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/8714099/50691cee50fd/pone.0260699.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/8714099/e9e53295601e/pone.0260699.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm.在系列回忆范式中,积极和消极情绪状态不会影响跨模态听觉分心。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 28;16(12):e0260699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260699. eCollection 2021.
2
Negative target stimuli do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction.负性目标刺激不会影响跨模态听觉分心。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0274803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274803. eCollection 2022.
3
Time of presentation affects auditory distraction: Changing-state and deviant sounds disrupt similar working memory processes.就诊时间影响听觉分心:变化状态和异常声音会干扰相似的工作记忆过程。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Mar;72(3):457-471. doi: 10.1177/1747021818758239. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
4
Sadness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli.悲伤会增加对听觉偏差刺激的分心。
Emotion. 2014 Feb;14(1):203-13. doi: 10.1037/a0034289. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
5
Is auditory distraction by changing-state and deviant sounds underpinned by the same mechanism? Evidence from pupillometry.由变化状态和异常声音引起的听觉分心是否由相同机制支撑?来自瞳孔测量法的证据。
Biol Psychol. 2019 Feb;141:64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
6
Happiness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli.快乐会增加对听觉异常刺激的注意力分散。
Br J Psychol. 2016 Aug;107(3):419-33. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12148. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
7
Monetary incentives have only limited effects on auditory distraction: evidence for the automaticity of cross-modal attention capture.货币激励对听觉分心的影响有限:跨模态注意捕获自动性的证据。
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):2997-3009. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01455-5. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
8
Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.任务特异性听觉分心对系列回忆和心算的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2023 May;51(4):930-951. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01363-6. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
9
Equivalent auditory distraction in children and adults.儿童和成人中的等效听觉干扰。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Aug;172:41-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
10
Age equivalence in auditory distraction by changing and deviant speech sounds.通过变化和异常语音实现听觉分心时的年龄等效性。
Psychol Aging. 2015 Dec;30(4):849-55. doi: 10.1037/pag0000055. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Negative target stimuli do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction.负性目标刺激不会影响跨模态听觉分心。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0274803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274803. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Monetary incentives have only limited effects on auditory distraction: evidence for the automaticity of cross-modal attention capture.货币激励对听觉分心的影响有限:跨模态注意捕获自动性的证据。
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):2997-3009. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01455-5. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
2
The manipulation of affect: A meta-analysis of affect induction procedures.情感操控:情感诱导程序的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;146(4):355-375. doi: 10.1037/bul0000224. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
3
How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction.
视觉注意力的部署如何调节听觉干扰。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jan;82(1):350-362. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01800-w.
4
Distraction by deviant sounds: disgusting and neutral words capture attention to the same extent.分散注意力的异常声音:令人厌恶和中性的词语吸引注意力的程度相同。
Psychol Res. 2020 Oct;84(7):1801-1814. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01192-4. Epub 2019 May 3.
5
Distraction by steady-state sounds: Evidence for a graded attentional model of auditory distraction.稳态声音引起的分心:听觉分心分级注意模型的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Apr;45(4):500-512. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000623. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
6
Auditory distraction does more than disrupt rehearsal processes in children's serial recall.听觉干扰不仅会打断儿童系列回忆中的复述过程。
Mem Cognit. 2019 May;47(4):738-748. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0879-4.
7
Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory.短期记忆和工作记忆模型的基准。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Sep;144(9):885-958. doi: 10.1037/bul0000153.
8
Postcategorical auditory distraction in short-term memory: Insights from increased task load and task type.短期记忆中的分类后听觉干扰:来自任务负荷增加和任务类型的见解
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jun;44(6):882-897. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000492. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
Fear Spreading Across Senses: Visual Emotional Events Alter Cortical Responses to Touch, Audition, and Vision.恐惧在多种感官间蔓延:视觉情绪事件改变皮层对触觉、听觉和视觉的反应。
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Jan 1;27(1):68-82. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw337.
10
Attentional capture by taboo words: A functional view of auditory distraction.禁忌词引发的注意捕获:听觉分心的功能视角
Emotion. 2017 Jun;17(4):740-750. doi: 10.1037/emo0000274. Epub 2017 Jan 12.