• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

错误定罪与错误无罪释放:运用帕克模型考察澳大利亚公众对司法错误的认知。

Wrongful Convictions and Erroneous Acquittals: Applying Packer's Model to Examine Public Perceptions of Judicial Errors in Australia.

机构信息

Griffith University - Mount Gravatt Campus, QLD, Australia.

Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2023 Jun;67(8):783-802. doi: 10.1177/0306624X211066826. Epub 2021 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1177/0306624X211066826
PMID:34963353
Abstract

The fallible nature of the criminal justice system continues to see judicial errors-that is, wrongful convictions and erroneous acquittals-undermine its integrity, efficacy, and legitimacy. Public perceptions of judicial errors are important contributors to criminal justice policy and reforms. The current study utilizes the 2016 Australian Survey of Social Attitudes (AuSSA) dataset to examine public attitudes toward judicial errors. It applies Herbert Packer's crime control and due process models to understand how concerns around procedural safeguards and public safety are associated with public perceptions toward judicial errors. Packer's model has been challenged by studies, which theorize that the models are not mutually exclusive. Yet, they have not been empirically tested in this context, which is a gap this study seeks to fill. Findings show that due process crime control concerns shape public attitudes toward wrongful convictions and challenge the notion that Packer's models be applied on a continuum.

摘要

刑事司法系统的易错性使得司法错误(即错误定罪和错误无罪释放)继续破坏其完整性、效力和合法性。公众对司法错误的看法是刑事司法政策和改革的重要推动因素。本研究利用 2016 年澳大利亚社会态度调查(AuSSA)数据集来研究公众对司法错误的态度。它应用赫伯特·帕克(Herbert Packer)的犯罪控制和正当程序模型来理解程序保障和公共安全方面的担忧与公众对司法错误的看法之间的关联。帕克的模型受到了一些研究的挑战,这些研究认为这些模型并非互斥。然而,在这种情况下,它们尚未经过实证检验,这是本研究试图填补的空白。研究结果表明,正当程序和犯罪控制方面的担忧影响了公众对错误定罪的态度,这对帕克模型应该在一个连续体上适用的观点提出了挑战。

相似文献

1
Wrongful Convictions and Erroneous Acquittals: Applying Packer's Model to Examine Public Perceptions of Judicial Errors in Australia.错误定罪与错误无罪释放:运用帕克模型考察澳大利亚公众对司法错误的认知。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2023 Jun;67(8):783-802. doi: 10.1177/0306624X211066826. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
2
Convicting the Innocent or Freeing the Guilty? Public Attitudes Toward Criminal Justice Errors.定罪无辜还是无罪释放?公众对刑事司法错误的态度。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2021 Mar;65(4):458-479. doi: 10.1177/0306624X20944684. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
3
Legislative responses to wrongful conviction: Do partisan principals and advocacy efforts influence state-level criminal justice policy?对误判的立法回应:党派原则和宣传努力会影响州一级的刑事司法政策吗?
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Jul;52:147-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
4
Watching the detectives: crime programming, fear of crime, and attitudes about the criminal justice system.
Sociol Q. 2011;52(1):36-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01191.x.
5
Public perceptions of criminal justice policy: does victimization make a difference?公众对刑事司法政策的看法:受害经历会产生影响吗?
Violence Vict. 1990 Summer;5(2):109-18.
6
Wrongful Convictions: Understanding the Experiences of the Original Crime Victims.错误定罪:了解原犯罪受害者的经历。
Violence Vict. 2016;31(1):155-66. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00152. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
7
Procedural justice in mental health courts: judicial practices, participant perceptions, and outcomes related to mental health recovery.心理健康法院的程序正义:与心理健康康复相关的司法实践、参与者认知和结果。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2013 Mar-Apr;36(2):113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
8
Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence.错误定罪和虚假或误导性法医证据的主张。
J Forensic Sci. 2023 May;68(3):908-961. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15233. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
9
Impact of information about sentencing decisions on public attitudes toward the criminal justice system.量刑决定信息对公众对刑事司法系统态度的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2001 Oct;25(5):515-28. doi: 10.1023/a:1012844932754.
10
Actual innocence: is death different?实际无罪:死亡是否有所不同?
Behav Sci Law. 2009 May-Jun;27(3):297-311. doi: 10.1002/bsl.863.