Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA.
Cornell University, New York City, NY, USA.
Hand (N Y). 2023 Jun;18(4):553-561. doi: 10.1177/15589447211064358. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
When patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) develop digital ischemia, conventional angiography (CA) is traditionally used to assess hand vasculature. Recently, Chang et al described an angiographic classification system for patients with SSc. Conventional angiography uses intravascular contrast agents that are nephrotoxic and vasoconstrictive. Owing to these limitations, this study assesses the use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) as an alternative to CA to evaluate hand vasculature in patients with digital ischemia.
This retrospective case series reports on 38 contrast-enhanced MRAs of hand vasculature from 30 symptomatic patients with SSc (N = 21) or SLE (N = 9). The radial and ulnar arteries (RA, UA) and the superficial and deep palmar arches were evaluated at standard reference points both quantitatively and qualitatively for their diameter, patency, and Chang classification.
In SSc MRAs (n = 26), the UA was significantly smaller than the RA and was occluded in 46%. In SLE MRAs (n = 12), the UA and RA had no difference in diameter and the UA was occluded in 25%. In SSc, the most common Chang classification was type 2 (UA involvement) in 44%. In SLE, the most common Chang classification was type 4 (UA and RA involvement) in 45%, with 18% classified as type 2.
Contrast-enhanced MRA used to assess hand vasculature in SSc patients with digital ischemia shows similar patterns of vascular involvement as previously demonstrated by CA. While vascular involvement in SSc predominantly involves the UA, the RA is also frequently involved in SLE.
当系统性硬化症(SSc)和系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者出现手指缺血时,传统上使用常规血管造影(CA)来评估手部血管。最近,Chang 等人描述了一种用于 SSc 患者的血管造影分类系统。传统的血管造影使用血管内对比剂,这些对比剂具有肾毒性和血管收缩性。由于这些局限性,本研究评估了使用对比增强磁共振血管造影(MRA)作为 CA 的替代方法,以评估手指缺血患者的手部血管。
本回顾性病例系列报告了 30 例有症状的 SSc(N=21)或 SLE(N=9)患者的 38 例手部血管对比增强 MRA。在标准参考点处对桡动脉(RA)和尺动脉(UA)以及掌浅弓和掌深弓进行定量和定性评估,以评估其直径、通畅性和 Chang 分类。
在 SSc MRA(n=26)中,UA 明显小于 RA,46%的患者 UA 闭塞。在 SLE MRA(n=12)中,UA 和 RA 的直径没有差异,UA 闭塞率为 25%。在 SSc 中,最常见的 Chang 分类是 2 型(UA 受累),占 44%。在 SLE 中,最常见的 Chang 分类是 4 型(UA 和 RA 受累),占 45%,其中 18%归类为 2 型。
用于评估手指缺血的 SSc 患者手部血管的对比增强 MRA 显示出与之前 CA 所示类似的血管受累模式。虽然 SSc 中的血管受累主要累及 UA,但 RA 在 SLE 中也经常受累。