Suppr超能文献

迈向流行病学研究设计的“无混杂因素”分类。

Toward an "unconfounded" classification of epidemiologic research design.

作者信息

Kramer M S, Boivin J F

出版信息

J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(7):683-8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90104-4.

Abstract

Existing classifications of research designs for epidemiologic studies are inconsistent and confusing because of the conceptual "confounding" of three distinct concepts: directionality in which exposure and outcome are investigated, sample selection criteria, and timing of the study proper with respect to the calendar times of exposure and outcome. The authors have attempted to construct a classification in which these three concepts comprise distinct (if not totally independent) axes. Closer attention to the distinctions described may help the planning and interpretation of epidemiologic studies, as well as facilitate future teaching and communication.

摘要

现有的流行病学研究设计分类存在不一致且令人困惑的问题,原因在于三个不同概念在概念上的“混淆”:研究暴露与结果的方向性、样本选择标准以及相对于暴露和结果的日历时间而言研究本身的时间安排。作者试图构建一种分类,其中这三个概念构成不同(即便并非完全独立)的轴。更加关注所描述的这些区别可能有助于流行病学研究的规划与解读,同时也便于未来的教学与交流。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验