Kishore Rashmi, Jhamb Urmila
Department of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, Delhi, India.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep;25(9):1059-1065. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23944.
Identifying ventilated patients ready for extubation is a challenge for clinicians. Premature extubation increases risks of reintubation while delayed weaning increases complications of prolonged ventilation. We compared the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and extubation failure in children extubated using a weaning protocol based on pressure support spontaneous breathing trial (PS SBT) vs those extubated after nonprotocolized physician-directed weaning.
A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted in the pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in children ventilated for ≥24 hours. All eligible patients underwent daily screening and were randomized once found fit. The intervention group underwent PS SBT of 2 hours duration followed by a T-piece trial and extubation. Controls underwent conventional weaning with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation mode and a T-piece trial before extubation.
Eighty patients were randomized into two groups of 40 each. About 77.5% of patients passed the PS SBT on the first attempt. No statistical difference was found either in the duration of MV between the two groups [median (interquartile range) in days: 4.77 (2.89, 9.46) in controls and 4.94 (2.23, 6.35) in cases, = 0.62] or in the rate of extubation failure (13% and 10.5%, = 1). Mortality was found to be significantly higher in the reintubated patients compared to those not reintubated in both groups ( = 0.002 in cases and 0.005 in controls).
Weaning using PS SBT-based protocol though did not shorten the duration of MV, it was found to be safe for assessing extubation readiness and did not increase extubation failure (CTRI no-CTRI/2018/04/013270).
Kishore R, Jhamb U. Effect of Protocolized Weaning and Spontaneous Breathing Trial vs Conventional Weaning on Duration of Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(9):1059-1065.
识别准备好拔管的机械通气患者对临床医生来说是一项挑战。过早拔管会增加再次插管的风险,而延迟撤机则会增加长时间机械通气的并发症。我们比较了使用基于压力支持自主呼吸试验(PS SBT)的撤机方案进行拔管的儿童与非规范化医生指导撤机后拔管的儿童的机械通气(MV)持续时间和拔管失败情况。
在一家三级护理医院的儿科重症监护病房对通气时间≥24小时的儿童进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验。所有符合条件的患者每天接受筛查,一旦被认定合适即进行随机分组。干预组进行了持续2小时的PS SBT,随后进行T形管试验和拔管。对照组在拔管前采用同步间歇强制通气模式进行传统撤机和T形管试验。
80例患者被随机分为两组,每组40例。约77.5%的患者在首次尝试时通过了PS SBT。两组之间的MV持续时间[中位数(四分位间距),单位:天:对照组为4.77(2.89,9.46),病例组为4.94(2.23,6.35),P = 0.62]或拔管失败率(分别为13%和10.5%,P = 1)均无统计学差异。发现两组中再次插管的患者死亡率均显著高于未再次插管的患者(病例组P = 0.002,对照组P = 0.005)。
尽管使用基于PS SBT的方案进行撤机并未缩短MV持续时间,但发现其用于评估拔管准备情况是安全的,且不会增加拔管失败率(临床试验注册号:CTRI/2018/04/013270)。
基肖尔·R,詹布·U。规范化撤机和自主呼吸试验与传统撤机对机械通气持续时间的影响:一项随机对照试验。《印度重症医学杂志》2021;25(9):1059 - 1065。