Suppr超能文献

联合推断配对生物标志物的 AUC 和 Youden 指数。

Joint inference about the AUC and Youden index for paired biomarkers.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Environmental Health Sciences, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2022 Jan 15;41(1):37-64. doi: 10.1002/sim.9222. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

Abstract

It is common to compare biomarkers' diagnostic or prognostic performance using some summary ROC measures such as the area under the ROC curve (AUC) or the Youden index. We propose to compare two paired biomarkers using both the AUC and the Youden index since the two indices describe different aspects of the ROC curve. This comparison can be made by estimating the joint confidence region (an elliptical area) of the differences of the paired AUCs and the Youden indices. Furthermore, for deciding if one marker is better than the other in terms of both the and the Youden index (J), we can test or against and using the paired differences. The construction of such a joint hypothesis is an example of the multivariate order-restricted hypotheses. For such a hypothesis, we propose and compare three testing procedures: (1) the intersection-union test ( ); (2) the conditional test; and (3) the joint test. The performance of the proposed inference methods was evaluated and compared through simulations. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed joint confidence region maintains the desired confidence level, and all three tests maintain the type I error under the null. Furthermore, among the three proposed testing methods, the conditional test is the preferred approach with markedly larger power consistently than the other two competing methods.

摘要

比较生物标志物的诊断或预后性能时,通常使用一些汇总 ROC 指标,如 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)或约登指数。我们建议使用 AUC 和 Youden 指数同时比较两种配对的生物标志物,因为这两个指标描述了 ROC 曲线的不同方面。可以通过估计配对 AUC 和 Youden 指数差值的联合置信区间(一个椭圆形区域)来进行这种比较。此外,为了确定一个标志物在 AUC 和 Youden 指数(J)方面是否优于另一个标志物,可以使用配对差异对 或 与 或 进行检验。这种联合假设的构建是多元有序限制假设的一个例子。对于这样的假设,我们提出并比较了三种检验程序:(1)交集-并集检验( );(2)条件检验;(3)联合检验。通过模拟评估和比较了所提出的推理方法的性能。模拟结果表明,所提出的联合置信区间保持了所需的置信水平,在零假设下,所有三种检验都保持了第一类错误率。此外,在三种拟议的检验方法中,条件检验是首选方法,其功效始终明显大于另外两种竞争方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验