Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Ounasjoentie, Rovaniemi, Finland.
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Paavo Havaksentie, Oulu, Finland.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 29;16(12):e0259246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259246. eCollection 2021.
The alternative prey hypothesis describes the mechanism for apparent competition whereby the mortality of the secondary prey species increases (and population size decreases decreases) by the increased predation by the shared predator if the population size of the primary prey decreases. Apparent competition is a process where the abundance of two co-existing prey species are negatively associated because they share a mutual predator, which negatively affects the abundance of both prey Here, we examined whether alternative prey and/or apparent competition hypothesis can explain the population dynamics and reproductive output of the secondary prey, wild forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus fennicus) in Finland, in a predator-prey community in which moose (Alces alces) is the primary prey and the wolf (Canis lupus) is the generalist predator.
We examined a 22-year time series (1996-2017) to determine how the population size and the calf/female ratio of wild forest reindeer in Eastern Finland were related to the abundances of wolf and moose. Only moose population size was regulated by hunting. Summer predation of wolves on reindeer focuses on calves. We used least squares regression (GLS) models (for handling autocorrelated error structures and resulting pseudo-R2s) and generalized linear mixed (GLMs) models (for avoidance of negative predictions) to determine the relationships between abundances. We performed linear and general linear models for the calf/female ratio of reindeer.
The trends in reindeer population size and moose abundance were almost identical: an increase during the first years and then a decrease until the last years of our study period. Wolf population size in turn did not show long-term trends. Change in reindeer population size between consecutive winters was related positively to the calf/female ratio. The calf/female ratio was negatively related to wolf population size, but the reindeer population size was related to the wolf population only when moose abundance was entered as another independent variable. The wolf population was not related to moose abundance even though it is likely to consist the majority of the prey biomass. Because reindeer and moose populations were positively associated, our results seemed to support the alternative prey hypothesis more than the apparent competition hypothesis. However, these two hypotheses are not mutually exclusive and the primary mechanism is difficult to distinguish as the system is heavily managed by moose hunting. The recovery of wild forest reindeer in eastern Finland probably requires ecosystem management involving both habitat restoration and control of species abundances.
替代猎物假说描述了一种机制,即如果主要猎物的种群数量减少,那么共同捕食者对次要猎物物种的捕食死亡率就会增加(种群数量减少),从而导致次要猎物的种群数量减少。 明显竞争是一种过程,其中两种共存的猎物物种的丰度呈负相关,因为它们共享一个共同的捕食者,这会对两种猎物的丰度产生负面影响。 在这里,我们研究了替代猎物和/或明显竞争假说是否可以解释次要猎物芬兰野生森林驯鹿(Rangifer tarandus fennicus)在以驼鹿(Alces alces)为主要猎物和狼(Canis lupus)为普通捕食者的捕食者-猎物群落中的种群动态和繁殖产量。
我们检查了一个 22 年的时间序列(1996-2017 年),以确定芬兰东部野生森林驯鹿的种群数量和幼鹿/雌性比例与狼和驼鹿的丰度有何关系。 只有驼鹿的种群数量受到狩猎的调节。 夏季狼对驯鹿的捕食主要集中在幼鹿上。 我们使用最小二乘回归(GLS)模型(用于处理自相关误差结构和产生的伪 R2)和广义线性混合(GLM)模型(用于避免负预测)来确定丰度之间的关系。 我们对驯鹿的幼鹿/雌性比例进行了线性和广义线性模型分析。
驯鹿种群数量和驼鹿丰度的趋势几乎相同:在研究期间的最初几年增加,然后减少到最后几年。 相反,狼的种群数量没有显示出长期趋势。 连续两个冬季之间驯鹿种群数量的变化与幼鹿/雌性比例呈正相关。 幼鹿/雌性比例与狼的种群数量呈负相关,但只有在将驼鹿丰度作为另一个独立变量输入时,驯鹿种群数量才与狼的种群数量有关。 即使狼很可能构成大部分猎物生物量,狼的种群数量与驼鹿的丰度也没有关系。 由于驯鹿和驼鹿的种群呈正相关,我们的结果似乎更支持替代猎物假说而不是明显竞争假说。 然而,这两个假设并不相互排斥,并且由于该系统受到驼鹿狩猎的严重管理,主要机制难以区分。 芬兰东部野生森林驯鹿的恢复可能需要涉及栖息地恢复和物种丰度控制的生态系统管理。