Martí-Solsona Elena, González-Chordá Víctor M, Andreu-Pejo Laura, Cervera-Gasch Águeda, Valero-Chillerón Maria Jesús, Mena-Tudela Desirée
Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, Avda Sos Baynat, 12071 Castellón, Spain.
Nurs Rep. 2020 Dec 1;10(2):115-123. doi: 10.3390/nursrep10020015.
This study aims to construct and validate a questionnaire that allows Parents' Perceptions of the complementary Baby-Led Weaning feeding method (PaPerc-BLW questionnaire) to be evaluated. An instrumental design was used. Five child nutrition experts took part in the development and content validity. The questionnaire was administered to a sample of 216 Spanish parents of infants aged 0-6 months to determine psychometric properties (construct validity and internal consistency). The factor analysis explained 65.12% of variance with three factors (Promoting infant autonomy and development; Infant's health; Parents' fear to apply BLW), and internal consistency was α = 0.67. The mean score of the PaPerc-BLW questionnaire for the total sample was 4.14 (DS = 0.64, 95% CI = 4.06-4.23). Significant differences were found in the parents' perception of baby-led weaning feeding method based on variables as previous children ( ≤ 0.001). Otherwise, the sample included in the study could bias the results, since 98.6% indicated that they were familiar with the BLW method and 62% had previous experience Despite this limitation, the PaPerc-BLW questionnaire offers adequate validity for evaluating parents' perception of the baby-led weaning method.
本研究旨在构建并验证一份问卷，以评估家长对婴儿自主进食辅食喂养方法的认知（PaPerc - BLW问卷）。采用了工具性设计。五位儿童营养专家参与了问卷的编制和内容效度评估。该问卷被发放给216名西班牙0至6个月婴儿的家长样本，以确定其心理测量学特性（结构效度和内部一致性）。因子分析解释了65.12%的方差，提取出三个因子（促进婴儿自主性和发育；婴儿健康；家长对实施婴儿自主进食辅食喂养方法的担忧），内部一致性系数α = 0.67。整个样本的PaPerc - BLW问卷平均得分为4.14（标准差 = 0.64，95%置信区间 = 4.06 - 4.23）。基于如是否有过养育孩子经历等变量，发现家长对婴儿自主进食辅食喂养方法的认知存在显著差异（≤ 0.001）。否则，纳入研究的样本可能会使结果产生偏差，因为98.6%的家长表示他们熟悉婴儿自主进食辅食喂养方法，62%的家长有过相关经验。尽管存在这一局限性，但PaPerc - BLW问卷在评估家长对婴儿自主进食辅食喂养方法的认知方面具有足够的效度。
