• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下“无出血血管需栓塞的通道(TBVE)”在经皮肾镜取石术中减少出血的临床分析

Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided "tract without bleeding vessel requiring embolization (TBVE)" in reducing bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

作者信息

Wang Zhipeng, Zhang Lei, Wan Liangwei, Wang Chen, Liu Xiaoqiang, Deng Jun

机构信息

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330000, China.

Jiangxi Institute of Urology, Nanchang, China.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2025 Aug 7;25(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01891-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-025-01891-8
PMID:40775332
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided tract without bleeding vessel requiring embolization (TBVE) versus conventional minimally invasive access in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) for reducing postoperative bleeding.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 188 patients who underwent Mini-PCNL by a single surgeon between June 2021 and July 2023. Patients scheduled for mini-PCNL were assigned to two groups based on access technique. The first group had no TBVE (Standard mini-PCNL, n = 95) and the second group had TBVE (TBVE-assisted Standard mini-PCNL, n = 93). Baseline characteristics-including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), stone location, stone size, and preoperative hemoglobin levels-were balanced (P > 0.05). Perioperative outcomes were compared using t-tests and χ² tests.

RESULTS

The TBVE-assisted mini-PCNL showed superior hemorrhage control, with significantly higher postoperative hemoglobin levels (111.32 ± 24.36 g/L vs. 120.13 ± 15.27 g/L, P < 0.05), smaller 24-hour hemoglobin declines (16.23 ± 15.27 g/L vs. 8.30 ± 7.21 g/L, P < 0.05), and fewer embolization-requiring events (6 vs. 1 case; P < 0.05). Operative time was comparable between groups (Mini-PCNL: 65.42 ± 34.97 min vs. TBVE: 67.73 ± 32.02 min, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TBVE significantly reduces the risk of bleeding in Mini-PCNL compared to conventional access, as evidenced by reduced hemoglobin loss and fewer embolization requirements, without significantly prolonging operative time. This technique enhances procedural safety in the management of complex renal calculi.

摘要

目的

比较超声引导下无出血血管需栓塞的经皮肾穿刺通道(TBVE)与传统微创通道在微创经皮肾镜取石术(Mini-PCNL)中减少术后出血的疗效。

方法

本回顾性研究分析了2021年6月至2023年7月间由同一位外科医生进行Mini-PCNL的188例患者。根据穿刺通道技术,将计划行Mini-PCNL的患者分为两组。第一组未采用TBVE(标准Mini-PCNL,n = 95),第二组采用TBVE(TBVE辅助标准Mini-PCNL,n = 93)。基线特征包括性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、结石位置、结石大小和术前血红蛋白水平均衡(P > 0.05)。采用t检验和χ²检验比较围手术期结果。

结果

TBVE辅助的Mini-PCNL在出血控制方面表现更优,术后血红蛋白水平显著更高(111.32 ± 24.36 g/L对120.13 ± 15.27 g/L,P < 0.05),24小时血红蛋白下降幅度更小(16.23 ± 15.27 g/L对8.30 ± 7.21 g/L,P < 0.05),需要栓塞的事件更少(6例对1例;P < 0.05)。两组手术时间相当(Mini-PCNL:65.42 ± 34.97分钟对TBVE:67.73 ± 32.02分钟,P > 0.05)。

结论

与传统通道相比,TBVE显著降低了Mini-PCNL的出血风险,表现为血红蛋白损失减少和栓塞需求减少,且未显著延长手术时间。该技术提高了复杂肾结石治疗的手术安全性。

相似文献

1
Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided "tract without bleeding vessel requiring embolization (TBVE)" in reducing bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.超声引导下“无出血血管需栓塞的通道(TBVE)”在经皮肾镜取石术中减少出血的临床分析
BMC Urol. 2025 Aug 7;25(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01891-8.
2
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs flexible ureteroscopy for 1-2 cm lower pole renal stones: a randomised controlled trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管软镜治疗1-2厘米下极肾结石的随机对照试验
BJU Int. 2025 Mar;135(3):437-445. doi: 10.1111/bju.16567. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
3
Clinical efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of upper urinary tract calculus (1-2.5 cm) in children ≤10 years of age.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行肾内手术治疗 10 岁以下儿童 1-2.5cm 上尿路结石的临床疗效比较。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Aug;20(4):605.e1-605.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.019. Epub 2024 May 25.
4
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗成人肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
5
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery versus percutaneuos nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric stone disease: A comparative analysis of efficacy and safety.内镜下联合肾内手术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗复杂小儿肾结石病:疗效和安全性的对比分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Aug;20(4):606.e1-606.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.025. Epub 2024 May 31.
6
Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones?仰卧位是否适合超声引导经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂肾结石?
Urol Int. 2023;107(6):550-556. doi: 10.1159/000528677. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
7
Does suction in Mini PCNL mitigate rise in intrarenal pressure? A prospective randomised study.迷你经皮肾镜取石术中的抽吸操作能否减轻肾内压力升高?一项前瞻性随机研究。
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jun 30;53(1):132. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01804-2.
8
Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较微创经皮肾镜取石术和标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗>2cm 肾结石:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Jul-Aug;48(4):637-648. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0347.
9
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound- vs Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Managing Renal Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.超声引导与荧光透视引导下经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Urology. 2025 Apr;198:170-178. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.11.025. Epub 2024 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing Balloon Dilation to Non-Balloon Dilation for Access in Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比较超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中球囊扩张与非球囊扩张的通道建立:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Jan-Feb;50(1):7-19. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0373.
2
The feasibility and safety of one-shot dilatation compared to conventional sequential dilatation in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.经皮肾镜碎石取石术中单次扩张与传统序贯扩张的可行性和安全性比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Dec 1;51(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01383-6.
3
A Safe and Effective Two-Step Tract Dilation Technique in Totally Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
完全超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中一种安全有效的两步通道扩张技术
Urol J. 2022 Dec 6;19(6):420-426. doi: 10.22037/uj.v19i.7205.
4
One-Shot Dilatation Metal Dilator During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Flank-Free Supine Position: A Randomized Controlled Study.单次扩张法在侧卧位无俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术中应用金属扩张器:一项随机对照研究。
J Endourol. 2022 Jun;36(6):727-733. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0378.
5
Comparison of single-step renal dilatation and serial renal dilatation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective case-control study.经皮肾镜取石术中单次肾扩张与序贯肾扩张的比较:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Urol Ann. 2021 Oct-Dec;13(4):374-377. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_118_20. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
6
Superselective Renal Artery Embolization Management of Post-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Hemorrhage and Its Methods.经皮肾镜取石术后出血的超选择性肾动脉栓塞治疗及其方法
Front Surg. 2020 Nov 26;7:582261. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.582261. eCollection 2020.
7
Balloon versus Amplatz for tract dilation in fluoroscopically guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.球囊扩张与 Amplatz 扩张器在透视引导下经皮肾镜取石术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 12;10(7):e035943. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035943.
8
The Pros and cons of balloon dilation in totally ultrasound-guided percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中球囊扩张的优缺点。
BMC Urol. 2020 Jul 1;20(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00654-x.
9
Effectiveness and safety of four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A meta-analysis.经皮肾镜取石术四种通道扩张方法的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Apr;19(4):2661-2671. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8486. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
10
Tract dilation monitored by ultrasound in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: feasible and safe.经皮肾镜取石术中超声监测通道扩张:可行且安全。
World J Urol. 2020 Jun;38(6):1569-1576. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02876-7. Epub 2019 Jul 16.