• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习方法预测肝切除术患者术后并发症风险。

Machine learning approaches for the prediction of postoperative complication risk in liver resection patients.

机构信息

Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Dec 30;21(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01731-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-021-01731-3
PMID:34969378
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8719378/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For liver cancer patients, the occurrence of postoperative complications increases the difficulty of perioperative nursing, prolongs the hospitalization time of patients, and leads to large increases in hospitalization costs. The ability to identify influencing factors and to predict the risk of complications in patients with liver cancer after surgery could assist doctors to make better clinical decisions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to develop a postoperative complication risk prediction model based on machine learning algorithms, which utilizes variables obtained before or during the liver cancer surgery, to predict when complications present with clinical symptoms and the ways of reducing the risk of complications.

METHODS

The study subjects were liver cancer patients who had undergone liver resection. There were 175 individuals, and 13 variables were recorded. 70% of the data were used for the training set, and 30% for the test set. The performance of five machine learning models, logistic regression, decision trees-C5.0, decision trees-CART, support vector machines, and random forests, for predicting postoperative complication risk in liver resection patients were compared. The significant influencing factors were selected by combining results of multiple methods, based on which the prediction model of postoperative complications risk was created. The results were analyzed to give suggestions of how to reduce the risk of complications.

RESULTS

Random Forest gave the best performance from the decision curves analysis. The decision tree-C5.0 algorithm had the best performance of the five machine learning algorithms if ACC and AUC were used as evaluation indicators, producing an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.91 (95% CI 0.77-1), with an accuracy of 92.45% (95% CI 85-100%), the sensitivity of 87.5%, and specificity of 94.59%. The duration of operation, patient's BMI, and length of incision were significant influencing factors of postoperative complication risk in liver resection patients.

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce the risk of complications, it appears to be important that the patient's BMI should be above 22.96 before the operation, and the duration of the operation should be minimized.

摘要

背景

对于肝癌患者来说,术后并发症的发生增加了围手术期护理的难度,延长了患者的住院时间,并导致住院费用大幅增加。识别影响因素并预测肝癌患者术后并发症的风险,可帮助医生做出更好的临床决策。

目的

本研究旨在基于机器学习算法,建立一个术后并发症风险预测模型,利用肝癌手术前或手术期间获得的变量,预测并发症出现临床症状的时间以及降低并发症风险的方法。

方法

研究对象为接受肝切除术的肝癌患者,共 175 例,记录了 13 个变量。70%的数据用于训练集,30%用于测试集。比较了逻辑回归、决策树-C5.0、决策树-CART、支持向量机和随机森林这 5 种机器学习模型对肝切除患者术后并发症风险预测的性能。结合多种方法的结果,选择显著影响因素,建立术后并发症风险预测模型。并对结果进行分析,提出降低并发症风险的建议。

结果

从决策曲线分析来看,随机森林的表现最佳。如果以 ACC 和 AUC 作为评价指标,决策树-C5.0 算法在 5 种机器学习算法中的性能最佳,产生的受试者工作特征曲线下面积值为 0.91(95%CI 0.77-1),准确率为 92.45%(95%CI 85-100%),敏感度为 87.5%,特异度为 94.59%。手术时间、患者 BMI 和切口长度是肝切除患者术后并发症风险的显著影响因素。

结论

为降低并发症风险,患者 BMI 术前应高于 22.96,且应尽量缩短手术时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce0/8719378/a30cd2eb4c4c/12911_2021_1731_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce0/8719378/33481a977948/12911_2021_1731_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce0/8719378/0937cce9fa80/12911_2021_1731_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce0/8719378/a30cd2eb4c4c/12911_2021_1731_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce0/8719378/33481a977948/12911_2021_1731_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce0/8719378/0937cce9fa80/12911_2021_1731_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce0/8719378/a30cd2eb4c4c/12911_2021_1731_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning approaches for the prediction of postoperative complication risk in liver resection patients.机器学习方法预测肝切除术患者术后并发症风险。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Dec 30;21(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01731-3.
2
Establishment of a risk prediction model for olfactory disorders in patients with transnasal pituitary tumors by machine learning.基于机器学习建立经鼻蝶窦垂体瘤患者嗅觉障碍风险预测模型。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 31;14(1):12514. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62963-7.
3
Prediction of postoperative infectious complications in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a study based on improved machine learning.基于改进机器学习的老年结直肠癌患者术后感染并发症预测研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jan 6;24(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02411-0.
4
Use of Machine Learning to Develop and Evaluate Models Using Preoperative and Intraoperative Data to Identify Risks of Postoperative Complications.使用机器学习,结合术前和术中数据开发和评估模型,以识别术后并发症的风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212240. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2240.
5
Investigating Risk Factors and Predicting Complications in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery with Machine Learning Algorithms.运用机器学习算法探究脑深部电刺激手术的风险因素并预测其并发症
World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb;134:e325-e338. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.063. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
6
A machine learning approach to predict early outcomes after pituitary adenoma surgery.一种用于预测垂体腺瘤手术后早期结果的机器学习方法。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Nov 1;45(5):E8. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.FOCUS18268.
7
Development of prediction model of low anterior resection syndrome for colorectal cancer patients after surgery based on machine-learning technique.基于机器学习技术的结直肠癌患者术后低位前切除综合征预测模型的建立。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):1501-1519. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5041. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
8
Development and performance assessment of novel machine learning models to predict pneumonia after liver transplantation.新型机器学习模型的开发和性能评估,以预测肝移植后的肺炎。
Respir Res. 2021 Mar 31;22(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01690-3.
9
Machine learning algorithm predicts urethral stricture following transurethral prostate resection.机器学习算法预测经尿道前列腺切除术后尿道狭窄。
World J Urol. 2024 May 15;42(1):324. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05017-x.
10
Predicting postoperative delirium after microvascular decompression surgery with machine learning.利用机器学习预测微血管减压术后谵妄
J Clin Anesth. 2020 Nov;66:109896. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109896. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Social Capital and Anxiety Among Older Adults in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国老年人社会资本与焦虑之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025 Mar 20;18:689-702. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S508795. eCollection 2025.
2
Predictors for 30-day mortality in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing liver resection.接受肝切除术的肝细胞癌患者30天死亡率的预测因素。
Narra J. 2024 Dec;4(3):e1001. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i3.1001. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
3
Outcome prediction after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases: out with the old, in with the new?

本文引用的文献

1
Automated machine learning: Review of the state-of-the-art and opportunities for healthcare.自动化机器学习:最新技术综述及医疗保健领域的机遇
Artif Intell Med. 2020 Apr;104:101822. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101822. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
2
Renal resistive index as a predictor of postoperative complications in liver resection surgery. Observational study.肾阻力指数作为肝切除术后并发症预测因子的研究。观察性研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Aug;35(4):731-740. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00529-4. Epub 2020 May 20.
3
Machine Learning Offers Exciting Potential for Predicting Postprocedural Outcomes: A Framework for Developing Random Forest Models in IR.
结直肠癌肝转移切除术后的预后预测:旧的淘汰,新的登场?
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Aug 1;13(4):732-735. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-187. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Innovation and challenges of artificial intelligence technology in personalized healthcare.人工智能技术在个性化医疗保健中的创新与挑战。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 16;14(1):18994. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70073-7.
5
Using Machine Learning to Predict Unplanned Hospital Utilization and Chemotherapy Management From Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.利用机器学习从患者报告的结果测量中预测非计划性医院利用和化疗管理。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Apr;8:e2300264. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00264.
6
Predicting Safe Liver Resection Volume for Major Hepatectomy Using Artificial Intelligence.使用人工智能预测肝大部切除术的安全肝切除体积
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 10;13(2):381. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020381.
7
Prediction of Complications and Prognostication in Perioperative Medicine: A Systematic Review and PROBAST Assessment of Machine Learning Tools.围手术期医学并发症预测和预后评估:机器学习工具的系统评价和 PROBAST 评估。
Anesthesiology. 2024 Jan 1;140(1):85-101. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004764.
8
Machine learning approach for the detection of vitamin D level: a comparative study.机器学习方法在维生素 D 水平检测中的应用:一项对比研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 16;23(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02323-z.
9
Identifying Effective Biomarkers for Accurate Pancreatic Cancer Prognosis Using Statistical Machine Learning.使用统计机器学习识别有效的生物标志物以准确预测胰腺癌预后
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 29;13(19):3091. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193091.
10
Interpretable prediction of cardiopulmonary complications after non-small cell lung cancer surgery based on machine learning and SHapley additive exPlanations.基于机器学习和SHapley加性解释的非小细胞肺癌手术后心肺并发症的可解释预测
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 3;9(7):e17772. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17772. eCollection 2023 Jul.
机器学习在预测术后结果方面具有令人兴奋的潜力:一种在 IR 中开发随机森林模型的框架。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Jun;31(6):1018-1024.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.11.030. Epub 2020 May 4.
4
Risk of complication at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prediction model built from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.腹腔镜子宫切除术时的并发症风险:基于国家手术质量改进计划数据库建立的预测模型。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;223(4):555.e1-555.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.023. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
5
A machine-learning approach to predicting hypotensive events in ICU settings.一种用于预测重症监护病房环境中低血压事件的机器学习方法。
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Mar;118:103626. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103626. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
6
Logistic regression was as good as machine learning for predicting major chronic diseases.逻辑回归在预测主要慢性病方面与机器学习一样出色。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:56-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
7
Prediction of gestational diabetes based on nationwide electronic health records.基于全国电子健康记录预测妊娠期糖尿病。
Nat Med. 2020 Jan;26(1):71-76. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0724-8. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
8
Is surgical duration associated with postoperative complications in primary shoulder arthroplasty?初次肩关节置换术后手术时间与术后并发症有关吗?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Apr;29(4):807-813. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
9
BiMM forest: A random forest method for modeling clustered and longitudinal binary outcomes.BiMM森林:一种用于对聚类和纵向二元结局进行建模的随机森林方法。
Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 2019 Feb 15;185:122-134. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
10
Identification of postoperative complications using electronic health record data and machine learning.利用电子健康记录数据和机器学习识别术后并发症。
Am J Surg. 2020 Jul;220(1):114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Oct 9.