• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定一个用于红斑狼疮性皮肤病的工作核心结局集:满足一个急迫未满足需求的实用方法。

Development of a working core outcome set for cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a practical approach to an urgent unmet need.

机构信息

Dermatology and Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Lupus Sci Med. 2021 Dec;8(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000529.

DOI:10.1136/lupus-2021-000529
PMID:34969875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8718411/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The lack of standardised outcomes and outcome measures for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) represents a substantial barrier to clinical trial design, comparative analysis and approval of novel investigative treatments. We aimed to develop a working core outcome set (COS) for CLE randomised controlled trials and longitudinal observational studies.

METHODS

We conducted a multistage literature review of CLE and SLE studies to generate candidate domains and outcome measures. Domains were narrowed to a working core domain set. Outcome measures for core domains were identified and examined.

RESULTS

Proposed core domains include skin-specific disease activity and damage, investigator global assessment (IGA) of disease activity, symptoms (encompassing itch, pain and photosensitivity), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity. Recommended physician-reported outcome measures include the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematous Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) and Cutaneous Lupus Activity IGA (CLA-IGA). For the domains of symptoms, HRQoL and PtGA of disease activity, we were unable to recommend one clearly superior instrument.

CONCLUSION

This work represents a starting point for further refinement pending formal consensus activities and more rigorous evaluations of outcome measure quality. In the interim, the proposed working COS can serve as a much-needed guide for upcoming CLE clinical trials.

摘要

目的

皮肤红斑狼疮(CLE)缺乏标准化的结局和结局测量方法,这是临床试验设计、比较分析和新型研究性治疗方法批准的重大障碍。我们旨在为 CLE 随机对照试验和纵向观察研究制定一个工作核心结局集(COS)。

方法

我们对 CLE 和 SLE 研究进行了多阶段文献回顾,以生成候选领域和结局测量方法。将领域缩小为工作核心领域集。确定并检查核心领域的结局测量方法。

结果

提出的核心领域包括皮肤特异性疾病活动和损伤、疾病活动的研究者全球评估(IGA)、症状(包括瘙痒、疼痛和光敏感)、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和疾病活动的患者整体评估(PtGA)。推荐的医生报告结局测量方法包括皮肤狼疮红斑疾病面积和严重程度指数(CLASI)和皮肤狼疮活动 IGA(CLA-IGA)。对于症状、HRQoL 和疾病活动的 PtGA 等领域,我们无法推荐一个明显优越的工具。

结论

这项工作是进一步完善的起点,有待正式达成共识的活动和对结局测量质量进行更严格的评估。在此期间,拟议的工作核心集可以作为即将到来的 CLE 临床试验急需的指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3150/8718411/9b5f5e3c1fec/lupus-2021-000529f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3150/8718411/d3a90ae44dcc/lupus-2021-000529f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3150/8718411/d0d0eff11b8b/lupus-2021-000529f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3150/8718411/9b5f5e3c1fec/lupus-2021-000529f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3150/8718411/d3a90ae44dcc/lupus-2021-000529f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3150/8718411/d0d0eff11b8b/lupus-2021-000529f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3150/8718411/9b5f5e3c1fec/lupus-2021-000529f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a working core outcome set for cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a practical approach to an urgent unmet need.制定一个用于红斑狼疮性皮肤病的工作核心结局集:满足一个急迫未满足需求的实用方法。
Lupus Sci Med. 2021 Dec;8(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000529.
2
Clinical outcome measures for cutaneous lupus erythematosus.皮肤红斑狼疮的临床疗效评估。
Lupus. 2010 Aug;19(9):1137-43. doi: 10.1177/0961203310370049.
3
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.治疗系统性红斑狼疮皮肤病变的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.
4
An update on clinical trials for cutaneous lupus erythematosus.皮肤红斑狼疮临床试验的最新进展。
J Dermatol. 2024 Jul;51(7):885-894. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17161. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
5
The cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease area and severity index: a responsive instrument to measure activity and damage in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus.皮肤红斑狼疮疾病面积和严重程度指数:一种用于测量皮肤红斑狼疮患者活动度和损伤情况的敏感工具。
Arch Dermatol. 2008 Feb;144(2):173-80. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.2.173.
6
Validation of the Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) using physician- and patient-assessed health outcome measures.使用医生和患者评估的健康结局测量来验证皮肤狼疮疾病面积和严重程度指数 (CLASI)。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Apr;68(4):618-623. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.08.035. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
7
Development of the CLASI as an outcome instrument for cutaneous lupus erythematosus.CLASI作为皮肤红斑狼疮结局工具的开发。
Dermatol Ther. 2007 Mar-Apr;20(2):93-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2007.00117.x.
8
Advancing understanding, diagnosis, and therapies for cutaneous lupus erythematosus within the broader context of systemic lupus erythematosus.在系统性红斑狼疮的更广泛背景下,推进对皮肤红斑狼疮的认识、诊断和治疗。
F1000Res. 2019 Mar 25;8. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17787.1. eCollection 2019.
9
Assessment of cutaneous disease activity in early lupus and its correlation with quality of life: a cross-sectional study.评估早期狼疮患者的皮肤疾病活动度及其与生活质量的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Rheumatol Int. 2023 Oct;43(10):1835-1840. doi: 10.1007/s00296-023-05353-y. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
10
Novel biological therapeutic approaches to cutaneous lupus erythematosus.治疗红斑狼疮的新型生物疗法。
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018 Oct;18(10):1041-1047. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1513484. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Afimetoran, a Toll-Like Receptor 7 and 8 Inhibitor, in Patients With Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: A Phase 1b Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.Toll样受体7和8抑制剂阿菲美托兰在皮肤红斑狼疮患者中的安全性、耐受性、疗效、药代动力学及药效学:一项1b期随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2025 Jul;7(7):e70059. doi: 10.1002/acr2.70059.
2
Subtype and Racial Erythema Variation for Cutaneous Lupus Trials.皮肤狼疮试验的亚型及种族性红斑变异
JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Jan 1;161(1):67-74. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.5190.
3
An update on clinical trials for cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

本文引用的文献

1
Preliminary definition of flare in cutaneous lupus erythematosus using the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index.使用皮肤红斑狼疮疾病面积和严重程度指数对皮肤红斑狼疮发作进行初步定义。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 Aug;87(2):418-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.08.036. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
2
The CLASI, a validated tool for the evaluation of skin disease in lupus erythematosus: a narrative review.CLASI,一种用于评估红斑狼疮皮肤疾病的有效工具:叙述性综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(5):431. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-5048.
3
The 12-Item Pruritus Severity Scale - Determining the Severity Bands.
皮肤红斑狼疮临床试验的最新进展。
J Dermatol. 2024 Jul;51(7):885-894. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17161. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
Editorial: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus landscape: pathophysiology, unmet needs, and related challenges in clinical practice. What is on the horizon?社论:皮肤红斑狼疮全景:病理生理学、未满足的需求以及临床实践中的相关挑战。未来有何展望?
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 27;11:1373552. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1373552. eCollection 2024.
5
Expert consensus achieved on a working core outcome set for cutaneous lupus erythematosus research in survey following the 5th International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (ICCLE).在第五届国际皮肤红斑狼疮会议(ICCLE)之后的调查中,就皮肤红斑狼疮研究的工作核心结局集达成了专家共识。
Lupus Sci Med. 2024 Feb 26;11(1):e001165. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001165.
6
Clinical trial outcomes for SLE: what we have and what we need.SLE 的临床试验结果:我们已有的和我们所需的。
Lupus Sci Med. 2024 Feb 15;11(1):e001114. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2023-001114.
7
Anifrolumab for Moderate and Severe Muco-Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: A Monocentric Experience and Review of the Current Literature.阿尼鲁单抗治疗中重度黏膜皮肤型红斑狼疮:单中心经验及当前文献综述
Biomedicines. 2023 Oct 26;11(11):2904. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11112904.
8
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease assessment: Highlighting CLE outcome measures.皮肤红斑狼疮疾病评估:突出皮肤红斑狼疮的结局指标。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 14;9:968469. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.968469. eCollection 2022.
9
Cutaneous Involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review for the Rheumatologist.系统性红斑狼疮的皮肤表现:风湿病医生的综述。
J Rheumatol. 2023 Jan;50(1):27-35. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.220089. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
12项瘙痒严重程度量表——确定严重程度等级
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Dec 17;7:614005. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.614005. eCollection 2020.
4
Lupus Erythematosus Quality of Life Questionnaire (LEQoL): Development and Psychometric Properties.红斑狼疮生活质量问卷(LEQoL):编制与心理测量学特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 20;17(22):8642. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228642.
5
'More extraordinary than mundane … ' A phenomenological analysis of the experiences of individuals living with CLE and their taking care in the sun.“比平凡更非凡……”对患有 CLE 并在阳光下护理的个体的经历进行的现象学分析。
Lupus. 2020 Nov;29(13):1773-1780. doi: 10.1177/0961203320958067. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
6
Evaluating change in disease activity needed to reflect meaningful improvement in quality of life for clinical trials in cutaneous lupus erythematosus.评估疾病活动的变化对于皮肤红斑狼疮临床试验中反映生活质量的有意义改善是必要的。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Jun;84(6):1562-1567. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.047. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
Advancing understanding, diagnosis, and therapies for cutaneous lupus erythematosus within the broader context of systemic lupus erythematosus.在系统性红斑狼疮的更广泛背景下,推进对皮肤红斑狼疮的认识、诊断和治疗。
F1000Res. 2019 Mar 25;8. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17787.1. eCollection 2019.
8
Core Domain Set Selection According to OMERACT Filter 2.1: The OMERACT Methodology.根据 OMERACT 筛选器 2.1 选择核心领域集:OMERACT 方法。
J Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;46(8):1014-1020. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.181097. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
9
Validation and reliability of a disease-specific quality-of-life measure in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus.评估皮肤红斑狼疮患者疾病特异性生活质量的测量工具的验证和可靠性。
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Jun;180(6):1430-1437. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17636. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
10
Understanding the disease burden and unmet needs among patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A qualitative study.了解皮肤红斑狼疮患者的疾病负担和未满足的需求:一项定性研究。
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2018 Apr 13;4(3):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.01.002. eCollection 2018 Sep.