Belanger Emmanuelle, Teno Joan M, Wang Xiao Joyce, Rosendaal Nicole, Gozalo Pedro L, Dosa David, Thomas Kali S
Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Department of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Aug;23(8):1383-1388.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.013. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
To examine the association between hospice/staffing regulations in residential care or assisted living (RC/AL) and hospice utilization among a national cohort of Medicare decedents residing in RC/AL at least 1 day during the last month of life, and to describe patterns of hospice utilization.
Retrospective cohort study of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries who died in 2018 and resided in an RC/AL community with ≥25 beds at least 1 day during the last month of life.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: 23,285 decedents who spent time in 6274 RC/AL communities with 146 state license classifications.
Descriptive statistics about hospice use; logistic regression models to test the association between regulations supportive of hospice care or registered nurse (RN) staffing requirements and the odds of hospice use in RC/AL in the last month of life.
More than half (56.4%) of the study cohort received hospice care in RC/AL at some point during the last 30 days of life, including 5.7% who received more intensive continuous home care (CHC). A larger proportion of decedents who resided in RC/ALs with supportive hospice policies received hospice (57.3% vs 52.6%), with this difference driven by more CHC hospice programs. This association remained significant after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, time spent in RC/AL, and Hospital Referral Region fixed effects. Decedents in RC/ALs with explicit RN staffing requirements had significantly less CHC use (2.0% vs 6.8%).
A large proportion of RC/AL decedents received hospice care in RC/AL regardless of differing regulations. Those in licensed settings with explicitly supportive hospice regulations were significantly more likely to receive hospice care in RC/AL during the last month of life, especially CHC level of hospice care. Regulatory change in states that do not yet explicitly allow hospice care in RC/AL may potentially increase hospice utilization in this setting, although the implications for quality of care remain unclear.
研究居住护理或辅助生活机构(RC/AL)中的临终关怀/人员配备规定与全国医疗保险参保人中在生命最后一个月至少有1天居住在RC/AL机构的临终关怀利用率之间的关联,并描述临终关怀利用模式。
对2018年去世且在生命最后一个月至少有1天居住在拥有≥25张床位的RC/AL社区的按服务收费的医疗保险受益人进行回顾性队列研究。
设置/参与者:23285名死者,他们曾在6274个RC/AL社区居住,这些社区有146种州许可分类。
关于临终关怀使用情况的描述性统计;逻辑回归模型,以测试支持临终关怀护理或注册护士(RN)人员配备要求的规定与生命最后一个月在RC/AL机构接受临终关怀的几率之间的关联。
超过一半(56.4%)的研究队列在生命的最后30天内在RC/AL机构接受了临终关怀护理,其中5.7%接受了更强化的持续家庭护理(CHC)。居住在有支持性临终关怀政策的RC/AL机构的死者中,接受临终关怀的比例更高(57.3%对52.6%),这种差异是由更多的CHC临终关怀项目驱动的。在控制了社会人口学特征、合并症、在RC/AL机构的居住时间以及医院转诊区域固定效应后,这种关联仍然显著。有明确RN人员配备要求的RC/AL机构中的死者CHC使用率显著较低(2.0%对6.8%)。
无论规定如何不同,很大一部分RC/AL机构中的死者在RC/AL机构接受了临终关怀护理。在有明确支持性临终关怀规定的许可机构中的死者在生命最后一个月在RC/AL机构接受临终关怀护理的可能性显著更高,尤其是CHC级别的临终关怀护理。尚未明确允许在RC/AL机构提供临终关怀护理的州的监管变化可能会增加这种环境下的临终关怀利用率,尽管对护理质量的影响仍不明确。