Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Oct 7;3(10):e223432. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3432.
Older adults are increasingly residing in assisted living residences during their last year of life. The regulations guiding these residential care settings differ between and within the states in the US, resulting in diverse policies that may support residents who wish to die in place.
To examine the association between state regulations and the likelihood of assisted living residents dying in place. The study hypothesis was that regulations supporting third-party services, such as hospice, increase the likelihood of assisted living residents dying in place.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study combined data about assisted living residences in the US from state registries with an inventory of state regulations and administrative claims data. The study participants comprised 168 526 decedents who were Medicare beneficiaries, resided in 8315 large, assisted living residences (with ≥25 beds) across 301 hospital referral regions during the last 12 months of their lives, and died between 2017 and 2019. Descriptive analyses were performed at the state level, and 3-level multilevel models were estimated to examine the association between supportive third-party regulations and dying in place in assisted living residences. The data were analyzed from September 2021 to August 2022.
Supportive (vs "silent," ie, not explicitly mentioned in regulatory texts) state regulations regarding hospice care, private care aides, and home health services, as applicable to licensed/registered assisted living residences across the US.
Presence in assisted living residences on the date of death.
The median (IQR) age of the 168 526 decedents included in the study was 90 (84-94) years. Of these, 110 143 (65.4%) were female and 158 491 (94.0%) were non-Hispanic White. Substantial variation in the percentage of assisted living residents dying in place was evident across states, from 18.0% (New York) to 73.7% (Utah). Supportive hospice and home health regulations were associated with a higher odds of residents dying in place (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.24-1.54; P < .001; and AOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.10-1.34; P < .001, respectively). In addition, hospice regulations remained significant in fully adjusted models (AOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.25-1.71).
The findings of this cohort study suggest that a higher percentage of assisted living residents died in place in US states with regulations supportive of third-party services. In addition, assisted living residents in licensed settings with regulations supportive of hospice regulations were especially likely to die in place.
越来越多的老年人在生命的最后一年居住在辅助生活住所。指导这些住宅护理机构的规定因美国各州之间和各州内部的不同而有所不同,导致支持希望就地死亡的居民的政策也各不相同。
研究州法规与辅助生活居民就地死亡的可能性之间的关联。研究假设是,支持第三方服务(如临终关怀)的法规会增加辅助生活居民就地死亡的可能性。
设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究将美国辅助生活住所的数据与州法规清单和行政索赔数据相结合。研究参与者包括在生命的最后 12 个月内居住在 301 个医院转诊区的 168526 名去世的 Medicare 受益人,他们居住在 8315 家大型辅助生活住所(每个住所≥25 张床位),并在 2017 年至 2019 年期间去世。在州一级进行描述性分析,并使用 3 级多层模型来检验支持性第三方法规与辅助生活住所中就地死亡之间的关联。数据的分析时间为 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 8 月。
支持性(与“沉默”相对,即不在监管文本中明确提及)的州法规,适用于美国各地的许可/注册辅助生活住所中的临终关怀、私人护理助手和家庭保健服务。
死亡日期当天在辅助生活住所中的存在情况。
研究中包括的 168526 名死者的中位(IQR)年龄为 90(84-94)岁。其中,110143 名(65.4%)为女性,158491 名(94.0%)为非西班牙裔白人。各州辅助生活居民就地死亡的比例存在很大差异,从 18.0%(纽约州)到 73.7%(犹他州)。支持性的临终关怀和家庭健康法规与居民就地死亡的可能性更高相关(调整后的优势比 [AOR],1.38;95%CI,1.24-1.54;P<0.001;和 AOR,1.21;95%CI,1.10-1.34;P<0.001,分别)。此外,临终关怀法规在完全调整的模型中仍然具有统计学意义(AOR,1.46;95%CI,1.25-1.71)。
这项队列研究的结果表明,美国各州的辅助生活居民中,有更高比例的居民在支持第三方服务的法规下就地死亡。此外,在有支持临终关怀法规的许可环境中,辅助生活居民尤其有可能就地死亡。