Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Jun;24(6):827-832.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
We examined the frequency and categories of end-of-life care transitions among assisted living community decedents and their associations with state staffing and training regulations.
Cohort study.
Medicare beneficiaries who resided in assisted living facilities and had validated death dates in 2018-2019 (N = 113,662).
We used Medicare claims and assessment data for a cohort of assisted living decedents. Generalized linear models were used to examine the associations between state staffing and training requirements and end-of-life care transitions. The frequency of end-of-life care transitions was the outcome of interest. State staffing and training regulations were the key covariates. We controlled for individual, assisted living, and area-level characteristics.
End-of-life care transitions were observed among 34.89% of our study sample in the last 30 days before death, and among 17.25% in the last 7 days. Higher frequency of care transitions in the last 7 days of life was associated with higher regulatory specificity of licensed [incidence risk ratio (IRR) = 1.08; P = .002] and direct care worker staffing (IRR = 1.22; P < .0001). Greater regulatory specificity of direct care worker training (IRR = 0.75; P < .0001) was associated with fewer transitions. Similar associations were found for direct care worker staffing (IRR = 1.15; P < .0001) and training (IRR = 0.79; P < .001) and transitions within 30 days of death.
There were significant variations in the number of care transitions across states. The frequency of end-of-life care transitions among assisted living decedents during the last 7 or 30 days of life was associated with state regulatory specificity for staffing and staff training. State governments and assisted living administrators may wish to set more explicit guidelines for assisted living staffing and training to help improve end-of-life quality of care.
本研究旨在调查辅助生活社区死亡者临终关怀过渡的频率和类别,并分析其与州人员配备和培训法规的关联。
队列研究。
本研究队列纳入了在 2018-2019 年居住在辅助生活设施中且经验证死亡日期的 Medicare 受益人群(N=113662)。
我们使用 Medicare 索赔和评估数据对一组辅助生活死亡者进行研究。采用广义线性模型分析各州人员配备和培训要求与临终关怀过渡之间的关联。本研究的主要结局是临终关怀过渡的频率。人员配备和培训法规是关键的协变量。我们控制了个体、辅助生活设施和地区层面的特征。
在研究样本中,有 34.89%的人在死亡前 30 天内发生了临终关怀过渡,有 17.25%的人在死亡前 7 天内发生了临终关怀过渡。生命最后 7 天内过渡频率较高与执照人员配备的监管特异性较高相关(发病率风险比 [IRR] = 1.08;P=.002)和直接护理人员配备(IRR=1.22;P<0.0001)。直接护理人员培训的监管特异性越高(IRR=0.75;P<0.0001),过渡次数越少。在死亡前 30 天内,直接护理人员配备(IRR=1.15;P<0.0001)和培训(IRR=0.79;P<0.001)与过渡也存在类似的关联。
各州之间的过渡次数存在显著差异。在生命最后 7 天或 30 天内,辅助生活死亡者临终关怀过渡的频率与州人员配备和员工培训的监管特异性相关。州政府和辅助生活管理人员可能希望为辅助生活人员配备和培训制定更明确的指南,以帮助改善临终关怀质量。