Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Oral Oncol. 2022 Feb;125:105694. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105694. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
Understanding the prevalence of guideline non-adherence among patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) and its impact on survival may facilitate increased adherence. Our objective was to perform a detailed analysis of overall National Comprehensive Care Network (NCCN) guideline adherence in a national cohort.
Using the National Cancer Database, we analyzed site-specific NCCN guideline adherence for treatment of 100,074 overall stage III and IVA HNC patients from 2004 to 2013. Main outcomes were guideline adherence rates and overall survival (OS). Adherence was categorized by treatment: surgery/ radiation. Reasons were categorized as: (1) high risk; (2) refusal; (3) not planned.
After exclusion, the care of 25,620 patients was defined as non-adherent (25.6%), yet adherence rates significantly improved across the study's years. After multivariate analysis, non-adherence was associated with age ≥ 65, female gender, black race, comorbidity score ≥ 1, insurance status, clinical staging, primary site, and facility type. Patients not managed according to NCCN guidelines had a significantly reduced OS compared with patients treated on-guideline (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.51 (95 %CI 1.48-1.54), p < 0.001). 'Not planned' patients had reduced OS when compared to adherent patients (HR = 1.27 (95 %CI 1.23-1.30), p < 0.001). Off-guideline treated patients due to 'risk factors' had a decrease in overall survival (OS) compared with other reasons (p < 0.001 for all).
Despite improvement over time, non-adherence to NCCN guidelines for advanced stage HNC remains high. Non-adherence is associated with decreased OS, regardless of the reason. Despite concerns from both patient and physician, efforts should be made to increase guideline awareness and adherence.
了解晚期头颈部癌症(HNC)患者指南不依从的流行程度及其对生存的影响,可能有助于提高依从性。我们的目的是对全国队列中 NCCN 指南的总体依从性进行详细分析。
使用国家癌症数据库,我们分析了 2004 年至 2013 年间 100074 例 III 期和 IVA 期 HNC 患者的特定部位 NCCN 指南治疗的依从性。主要结果是指南依从率和总生存率(OS)。依从性通过治疗进行分类:手术/放疗。原因分为:(1)高危;(2)拒绝;(3)未计划。
排除后,25620 例患者的治疗定义为不依从(25.6%),但随着研究年限的推移,依从率显著提高。多变量分析后,不依从与年龄≥65 岁、女性、黑种人、合并症评分≥1、保险状况、临床分期、原发部位和医疗机构类型有关。与按 NCCN 指南治疗的患者相比,不符合 NCCN 指南治疗的患者 OS 显著降低(风险比(HR)=1.51(95%CI 1.48-1.54),p<0.001)。与依从性患者相比,“未计划”患者的 OS 降低(HR=1.27(95%CI 1.23-1.30),p<0.001)。由于“危险因素”而偏离指南治疗的患者的总生存率(OS)下降(所有原因均 p<0.001)。
尽管随着时间的推移有所改善,但晚期 HNC 患者对 NCCN 指南的依从性仍然很高。不依从与 OS 降低有关,无论原因如何。尽管患者和医生都有顾虑,但应努力提高对指南的认识和依从性。