• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Religion and cancer prevention: study protocol for a systematic review.宗教与癌症预防:系统评价的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 31;11(12):e046126. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046126.
2
Religious Denomination, Religiosity, Religious Attendance, and Cancer Prevention. A Systematic Review.宗教派别、宗教虔诚度、宗教活动参与情况与癌症预防。一项系统综述
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Jan 16;15:45-58. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S341085. eCollection 2022.
3
Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies.焦虑、抑郁与生活质量的关系:一项基于纵向研究的系统评价证据的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 4;9(3):e027218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027218.
4
Informal caregiving for adults, loneliness and social isolation: a study protocol for a systematic review.成人非正式护理、孤独和社会隔离:系统评价研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 4;11(5):e044902. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044902.
5
Social media and mobile health technology for cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.社交媒体和移动医疗技术在癌症筛查中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 5;10(2):e035411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035411.
6
Nutrition screening and assessment tools for patients with cancer and survivors of cancer: a systematic review protocol.癌症患者及癌症幸存者的营养筛查与评估工具:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 1;10(10):e037844. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037844.
7
Determinants of healthcare use based on the Andersen model: a study protocol for a systematic review of longitudinal studies.基于安德森模型的医疗保健使用决定因素:系统评价纵向研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 19;11(5):e044435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044435.
8
Personality, Health Care Use, and Costs: A Study Protocol for a Systematic Review.人格、医疗保健利用与成本:一项系统评价的研究方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Aug 12;8(3):263. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030263.
9
Systematic review protocol examining the influence of surgeon personality on perioperative decision making in abdominal surgery.系统评价方案,旨在研究外科医生个性对腹部手术围手术期决策的影响。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 3;10(2):e035361. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035361.
10
Correlation of mesolevel characteristics of the healthcare system and socioeconomic inequality in healthcare use: a scoping review protocol.卫生保健系统中观特征与卫生保健利用的社会经济不平等之间的相关性:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e044301. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044301.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive Analysis of NPSR1-AS1 as a Novel Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker Involved in Immune Infiltrates in Lung Adenocarcinoma.NPSR1-AS1作为参与肺腺癌免疫浸润的新型诊断和预后生物标志物的综合分析
J Oncol. 2022 Oct 15;2022:2099327. doi: 10.1155/2022/2099327. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Religious Attendance and Cancer Screening Behavior.宗教活动参与情况与癌症筛查行为
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 23;10:583925. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.583925. eCollection 2020.
2
Nurses' response to spiritual needs of cancer patients.护士对癌症患者精神需求的反应。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Oct;48:101792. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101792. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
3
Religious-service attendance and subsequent health and well-being throughout adulthood: evidence from three prospective cohorts.宗教仪式参与度与成年后健康和幸福感的关系:来自三个前瞻性队列的证据。
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Jan 23;49(6):2030-2040. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa120.
4
Personality traits and preventive cancer screenings in the Health Retirement Study.《健康与退休研究》中的人格特质与癌症预防筛查
Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105763. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105763. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
5
Religiousness and lifestyle among Europeans in SHARE.欧洲 SHARE 项目中的宗教信仰和生活方式。
Public Health. 2018 Dec;165:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
6
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
7
A systematic review of the association of anxiety with health care utilization and costs in people aged 65 years and older.一项关于 65 岁及以上人群焦虑与医疗保健利用和费用之间关系的系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2018 May;232:163-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
8
A Systematic Review of Promising Strategies of Faith-Based Cancer Education and Lifestyle Interventions Among Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups.对种族/族裔少数群体中基于信仰的癌症教育和生活方式干预的有前景策略的系统评价。
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Dec;33(6):1161-1175. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1277-5.
9
Health system barriers and enablers to early access to breast cancer screening, detection, and diagnosis: a global analysis applied to the MENA region.卫生系统对早期获得乳腺癌筛查、检测和诊断的障碍和促进因素:在中东和北非地区应用的全球分析。
Public Health. 2017 Nov;152:58-74. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.07.020. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
10
A Systematic Review of the Factors Influencing Ethnic Minority Women's Cervical Cancer Screening Behavior: From Intrapersonal to Policy Level.影响少数民族女性宫颈癌筛查行为的因素:从个人层面到政策层面的系统评价
Cancer Nurs. 2017 Nov/Dec;40(6):E1-E30. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000436.

宗教与癌症预防:系统评价的研究方案。

Religion and cancer prevention: study protocol for a systematic review.

机构信息

Department for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Department for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 31;11(12):e046126. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046126.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046126
PMID:34972759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8720988/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Several studies explored a relationship between religiousness and the utilisation of cancer screenings, as religious people may obtain an increased social network or could have certain personality traits that enhance screening use. To the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic review that sums up the evidence gained from research on that relationship. Thus, our review aims to appraise the findings of observational studies regarding that relationship. Its findings may be useful in addressing specific target groups to increase ineffectively the low cancer screening rates.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Employing a predefined search algorithm, three online databases (CINAHL, PsycInfo and PubMed) will be searched. In addition, the bibliographies of the studies included in our review will be searched through manually and independently by two reviewers. We are looking for observational studies (both cross-sectional and longitudinal) which examine the association between religion and cancer screening utilisation. However, studies regarding specific samples (as ethnic minorities or religious sects) will be excluded. We expect that the studies examine various dimensions of religion, such as religious attendance or religious intensity. We will extract data that describe methodology, sample characteristics and the findings concerning our object of investigation. Moreover, a quality assessment will be performed. Two reviewers will independently select the studies, extract the data and assess the studies' quality. Disagreements will be dissolved by discussion or by inclusion of a third party. The findings will be presented narratively in text and tables. If possible, a meta-analysis will be carried out.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As no primary data are collected, the approval from an ethics committee is not required. Our review will be published in a peer-reviewed, scientific journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021229222.

摘要

简介

多项研究探讨了宗教信仰与癌症筛查利用之间的关系,因为宗教人士可能会获得更多的社交网络,或者可能具有某些增强筛查利用的个性特征。据我们所知,目前尚无系统评价综合评估关于这种关系的研究结果。因此,我们的综述旨在评估关于这种关系的观察性研究的发现。其研究结果可能有助于针对特定目标群体,提高效率低下的低癌症筛查率。

方法和分析

采用预定义的搜索算法,将在三个在线数据库(CINAHL、PsycInfo 和 PubMed)中进行搜索。此外,还将通过两位评审员手动独立地搜索纳入本综述的研究的参考文献。我们正在寻找观察性研究(包括横断面研究和纵向研究),这些研究检查了宗教与癌症筛查利用之间的关联。但是,将排除针对特定样本(如少数民族或宗教教派)的研究。我们预计这些研究将检查宗教的各种维度,例如宗教出勤率或宗教强度。我们将提取描述方法、样本特征和关于我们研究对象的发现的数据。此外,还将进行质量评估。两位评审员将独立选择研究、提取数据并评估研究的质量。意见分歧将通过讨论或纳入第三方来解决。研究结果将以文字和表格的形式进行叙述性呈现。如果可能,将进行荟萃分析。

伦理和传播

由于没有收集原始数据,因此不需要伦理委员会的批准。我们的综述将发表在同行评议的科学期刊上。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021229222。