• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Nutrition screening and assessment tools for patients with cancer and survivors of cancer: a systematic review protocol.癌症患者及癌症幸存者的营养筛查与评估工具:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 1;10(10):e037844. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037844.
2
Cognitive functioning and work-related outcomes of non-central nervous system cancer survivors: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis.非中枢神经系统癌症幸存者的认知功能和与工作相关的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 12;12(7):e060300. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060300.
3
Technology-assisted depression screening tools for patients with cancer: a systematic review protocol.技术辅助的癌症患者抑郁筛查工具:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 3;11(3):e041878. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041878.
4
Telerehabilitation programmes for patients with cancer and survivors: a protocol for a systematic review.远程康复计划在癌症患者和幸存者中的应用:系统综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 7;12(4):e058981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058981.
5
Social media and mobile health technology for cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.社交媒体和移动医疗技术在癌症筛查中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 5;10(2):e035411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035411.
6
Overweight and obesity management strategies in survivors of paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a systematic review protocol.小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病幸存者的超重和肥胖管理策略:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 22;8(6):e022530. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022530.
7
Nutritional therapy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.肌萎缩侧索硬化症的营养治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 25;12(8):e064086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064086.
8
Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for distress: systematic review protocol.改善癌症患者痛苦筛查及适当转诊的干预措施:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 21;5(9):e008277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008277.
9
Early screening for post-stroke depression, and the effect on functional outcomes, quality of life and mortality: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.早期筛查卒中后抑郁,及其对功能结局、生活质量和死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 17;11(8):e050451. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050451.
10
Sharps injuries and splash exposures among healthcare workers in Arab countries: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.阿拉伯国家医护人员的锐器伤和喷溅暴露:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 7;11(10):e052993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052993.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of Phoniatric PREhabilitation in Head and Neck Cancer patients on Aspiration and Preservation of Swallowing (PREHAPS): study protocol of a monocentric prospective randomized interventional outcome-blinded trial.喉癌患者语音治疗对吞咽功能的影响(PREHAPS):一项单中心前瞻性随机干预性结局盲法试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Mar 22;25(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08010-2.

本文引用的文献

1
High prevalence of malnutrition and nutrition impact symptoms in older patients with cancer: Results of a Brazilian multicenter study.癌症老年患者中营养不良和营养影响症状的高患病率:巴西多中心研究的结果。
Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;126(1):156-164. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32437. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
2
Nutritional Screening Tools Used and Validated for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.用于癌症患者的营养筛查工具:系统评价。
Nutr Cancer. 2019;71(6):898-907. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2019.1595045. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
3
Prevalence and prognostic significance of malnutrition in patients with cancers of the head and neck.头颈部癌症患者的营养不良患病率及其预后意义。
Clin Nutr. 2020 Mar;39(3):901-909. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.03.030. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
4
Nutrition impact symptoms and associated outcomes in post-chemoradiotherapy head and neck cancer survivors: a systematic review.放化疗后头颈部癌症幸存者的营养影响症状及相关结局:系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Aug;12(4):479-494. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0687-7. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
5
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
6
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2:一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具,该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究,或两者皆有。
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
7
ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition.ESPEN 专家组关于癌症相关营养不良问题行动的建议。
Clin Nutr. 2017 Oct;36(5):1187-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
8
Assessing nutritional status in cancer: role of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment.评估癌症患者的营养状况:患者主观全面评定法的作用
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2017 Sep;20(5):322-329. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000389.
9
Health-related quality of life 10 years after oesophageal cancer surgery.食管癌手术后10年的健康相关生活质量。
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Dec;69:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.09.032. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
10
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.

癌症患者及癌症幸存者的营养筛查与评估工具:一项系统评价方案

Nutrition screening and assessment tools for patients with cancer and survivors of cancer: a systematic review protocol.

作者信息

Kristensen Marianne Boll, Wessel Irene, Ustrup Kim Skov, Dieperink Karin B, Zwisler Ann-Dorthe, Beck Anne Marie

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Nutrition, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Odense University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Nyborg, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 1;10(10):e037844. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037844.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037844
PMID:33004394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7534678/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Nutritional challenges are common consequences of cancer, and they do not only occur in the hospital setting. They are also frequent after completion of treatment, and nutritional interventions in community-based post-treatment rehabilitation services are important. The first step towards initiating any nutritional intervention is to identify the individual in need hereof, but evidence is limited on the applicability of different nutrition screening and assessment tools in the post-treatment rehabilitation services. The aim is to systematically review and identify nutrition screening and assessment tools appropriate for use in patients with cancer and survivors of cancer in hospital or community-based healthcare settings.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this systematic review, the electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL Complete and Embase were searched systematically using comprehensive search strategies. Primary searches were carried out in August 2018 with updated searches performed in November 2019. Clinicaltrials.gov and PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews will be searched for additional relevant studies. Studies will be included if they validate a nutrition screening or assessment tool in adult patients with cancer or survivors of cancer. No restriction on publication date will be applied, and full-text articles in English, Danish, Norwegian and Swedish are eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers will independently conduct screening of search results, study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. Data will be synthesised narratively.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical approval is required. Results will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and published in an international peer-reviewed journal. Furthermore, results will be presented in relevant research and clinical fora to facilitate transfer of results to clinical practice in benefit of patients.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018096678.

摘要

引言

营养挑战是癌症常见的后果,且不仅发生在医院环境中。在治疗结束后也很常见,因此基于社区的治疗后康复服务中的营养干预很重要。启动任何营养干预的第一步是确定有此需求的个体,但关于不同营养筛查和评估工具在治疗后康复服务中的适用性的证据有限。目的是系统评价并确定适用于医院或基于社区的医疗环境中癌症患者和癌症幸存者的营养筛查和评估工具。

方法与分析

在本系统评价中,使用全面的检索策略系统检索电子数据库PubMed、CINAHL Complete和Embase。2018年8月进行了初步检索,并于2019年11月进行了更新检索。将检索Clinicaltrials.gov和PROSPERO国际前瞻性系统评价注册库以获取其他相关研究。如果研究验证了针对成年癌症患者或癌症幸存者的营养筛查或评估工具,则将其纳入。不限制发表日期,英文、丹麦文、挪威文和瑞典文的全文文章均符合纳入条件。两名评价者将独立进行检索结果筛选、研究选择、数据提取和质量评估。将对数据进行叙述性综合分析。

伦理与传播

无需伦理批准。将根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目声明报告结果,并发表在国际同行评审期刊上。此外,将在相关研究和临床论坛上展示结果,以促进将结果转化为临床实践,造福患者。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42018096678。