Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural and Management Science, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Cancer Health Services Research, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):3067-3075. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08422-7. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
Estimating the maximum acceptable cost (MAC) per screened individual for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer (LC) screening, and determining the effect of additionally screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), or both on the MAC.
A model-based early health technology assessment (HTA) was conducted to estimate whether a new intervention could be cost-effective by calculating the MAC at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of €20k/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and €80k/QALY, for a population of current and former smokers, aged 50-75 years in The Netherlands. The MAC was estimated based on incremental QALYs gained from a stage shift assuming screened individuals are detected in earlier disease stages. Data were obtained from literature and publicly available statistics and validated with experts.
The MAC per individual for implementing LC screening at a WTP of €20k/QALY was €113. If COPD, CVD, or both were included in screening, the MAC increased to €230, €895, or €971 respectively. Scenario analyses assessed whether screening-specific disease high-risk populations would improve cost-effectiveness, showing that high-risk CVD populations were more likely to improve economic viability compared to COPD.
The economic viability of combined screening is substantially larger than for LC screening alone, primarily due to benefits from CVD screening, and is dependent on the target screening population, which is key to optimise the screening program. The total cost of breast and cervical cancer screening is lower (€420) than the MAC of Big-3, indicating that Big-3 screening may be acceptable from a health economic perspective.
• Once-off combined low-dose CT screening for lung cancer, COPD, and CVD in individuals aged 50-75 years is potentially cost-effective if screening would cost less than €971 per screened individual. • Multi-disease screening requires detailed insight into the co-occurrence of these diseases to identify the optimal target screening population. • With the same target screening population and WTP, lung cancer-only screening should cost less than €113 per screened individual to be cost-effective.
估算每位接受低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)肺癌(LC)筛查者的可接受最高成本(MAC),并确定是否因同时筛查慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、心血管疾病(CVD)或两者兼而有之而对 MAC 产生影响。
通过计算在荷兰当前和前吸烟者(年龄 50-75 岁)人群中,新干预措施在支付意愿(WTP)为 20 千欧元/QALY 和 80 千欧元/QALY 时是否具有成本效益,进行基于模型的早期卫生技术评估(HTA)。MAC 是基于从假设筛查个体在更早疾病阶段被发现的阶段转移中获得的增量 QALY 估算的。数据来自文献和公开统计数据,并经专家验证。
在 WTP 为 20 千欧元/QALY 的情况下,实施 LC 筛查的个体 MAC 为 113 欧元。如果将 COPD、CVD 或两者都纳入筛查,MAC 将分别增加到 230、895 或 971 欧元。情景分析评估了筛查特定疾病高危人群是否会提高成本效益,结果表明,与 COPD 相比,高风险 CVD 人群更有可能提高经济可行性。
联合筛查的经济可行性明显大于单独筛查 LC,主要原因是 CVD 筛查的获益,并且取决于目标筛查人群,这是优化筛查计划的关键。乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的总成本(420 欧元)低于 Big-3 的 MAC,表明从健康经济学角度来看,Big-3 筛查可能是可以接受的。
如果每位 50-75 岁个体的低剂量 CT 筛查肺癌、COPD 和 CVD 的费用低于 971 欧元,则联合筛查可能具有成本效益。
多疾病筛查需要详细了解这些疾病的共同发生情况,以确定最佳目标筛查人群。
对于具有相同目标筛查人群和 WTP 的人群,仅筛查肺癌的费用应低于 113 欧元/人,才能具有成本效益。