Training and Research Department (G.E., S.V., R.O., L.F., R.P.), National Tumor Assistance (ANT), Bologna, Italy.
Training and Research Department (G.E., S.V., R.O., L.F., R.P.), National Tumor Assistance (ANT), Bologna, Italy.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Apr;63(4):e349-e356. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.027. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
The COVID-19 pandemic strongly challenged healthcare workers, disrupting their work routine and impacting on their professional life. A previous investigation explored levels of burnout and psychological morbidity among palliative care professionals (PCPs) during COVID-19 first wave.
To update data about burnout and psychological morbidity among PCPs after a year of COVID-19 pandemic.
The same questionnaires on burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory, MBI) and psychological morbidity (General Health Questionnaire 12 items, GHQ-12) were administered a year after. Differences in MBI and GHQ-12 scores obtained in the two studies (COVID2020 and COVID2021), as well as distributions of PCPs showing burnout symptoms and psychological morbidity were analyzed and compared. We also explored the association between the three dimensions of burnout and socio-demographic and professional characteristics.
The sample consisted of 145 PCPs (59% physicians and 41% nurses). Response rate (70.4%) was quite similar to the previous study (73.2%). No differences were observed in the frequency of burnout between COVID2021 and COVID2020; the PCPs in COVID2021 reported marginally higher level of EE (P = .049) and this result is confirmed in physicians (P = .010) while no difference was observed in nurses (P = .326). In addition, the percentage of cases showing psychological morbidity significantly decreased.
Our findings show stable levels of burnout and decreasing levels of psychological morbidity among PCPs one year after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, more research is needed to detail the significance of emotional exhaustion dimension, a variable influenced by the survey.
COVID-19 大流行给医护人员带来了巨大挑战,扰乱了他们的工作常规,并对他们的职业生活产生了影响。之前的一项调查研究了 COVID-19 第一波期间姑息治疗专业人员(PCP)的倦怠和心理发病率。
更新 COVID-19 大流行一年后 PCP 倦怠和心理发病率的数据。
一年后,对同一组 PCP 进行了关于倦怠(Maslach 倦怠量表,MBI)和心理发病率(一般健康问卷 12 项,GHQ-12)的问卷调查。分析并比较了这两项研究(COVID2020 和 COVID2021)中 MBI 和 GHQ-12 得分的差异,以及表现出倦怠症状和心理发病率的 PCP 分布。我们还探讨了倦怠的三个维度与社会人口统计学和职业特征之间的关联。
样本由 145 名 PCP 组成(59%为医生,41%为护士)。回复率(70.4%)与之前的研究(73.2%)相当。COVID2021 与 COVID2020 之间的倦怠发生率没有差异;COVID2021 中的 PCP 报告了稍高的 EE 水平(P=0.049),这一结果在医生中得到了证实(P=0.010),而在护士中则没有差异(P=0.326)。此外,表现出心理发病率的病例百分比显著下降。
我们的研究结果表明,COVID-19 大流行一年后,PCP 的倦怠水平稳定,心理发病率下降。然而,需要进一步的研究来详细说明情感耗竭维度的意义,这是一个受调查影响的变量。