1Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery and Neurotechnology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen.
2Institute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, Department of Neurosurgery and Neurotechnology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Neurosurg Focus. 2022 Jan;52(1):E12. doi: 10.3171/2021.10.FOCUS21359.
Conventional frame-based stereotaxy through a transfrontal approach (TFA) is the gold standard in brainstem biopsies. Because of the high surgical morbidity and limited impact on therapy, brainstem biopsies are controversial. The introduction of robot-assisted stereotaxy potentially improves the risk-benefit ratio by simplifying a transcerebellar approach (TCA). The aim of this single-center cohort study was to evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of transcerebellar brainstem biopsies performed by 2 different robotic systems. In addition to standard quality indicators, a special focus was set on trajectory selection for reducing surgical morbidity.
This study included 25 pediatric (n = 7) and adult (n = 18) patients who underwent 26 robot-assisted biopsies via a TCA. The diagnostic yield, complication rate, trajectory characteristics (i.e., length, anatomical entry, and target-point location), and skin-to-skin (STS) time were evaluated. Transcerebellar and hypothetical transfrontal trajectories were reconstructed and transferred into a common MR space for further comparison with anatomical atlases.
Robot-assisted, transcerebellar biopsies demonstrated a high diagnostic yield (96.2%) while exerting no surgical mortality and no permanent morbidity in both pediatric and adult patients. Only 3.8% of cases involved a transient neurological deterioration. Transcerebellar trajectories had a length of 48.4 ± 7.3 mm using a wide stereotactic corridor via crus I or II of the cerebellum and the middle cerebellar peduncle. The mean STS time was 49.5 ± 23.7 minutes and differed significantly between the robotic systems (p = 0.017). The TFA was characterized by longer trajectories (107.4 ± 11.8 mm, p < 0.001) and affected multiple eloquent structures. Transfrontal target points were located significantly more medial (-3.4 ± 7.2 mm, p = 0.042) and anterior (-3.9 ± 8.4 mm, p = 0.048) in comparison with the transcerebellar trajectories.
Robot-assisted, transcerebellar stereotaxy can improve the risk-benefit ratio of brainstem biopsies by avoiding the restrictions of a TFA and conventional frame-based stereotaxy. Profound registration and anatomical-functional trajectory selection were essential to reduce mortality and morbidity.
经额入路传统框架立体定向术(TFA)是脑干活检的金标准。由于手术发病率高,对治疗的影响有限,脑干活检存在争议。机器人辅助立体定向术通过简化经小脑入路(TCA),有可能改善风险效益比。本单中心队列研究的目的是评估通过 2 种不同的机器人系统进行经小脑脑干活检的风险效益比。除了标准质量指标外,还特别关注减少手术发病率的轨迹选择。
本研究纳入了 25 例儿科(n=7)和成人(n=18)患者,他们共进行了 26 例经 TCA 机器人辅助活检。评估了诊断率、并发症发生率、轨迹特征(即长度、解剖入口和靶点位置)以及皮肤到皮肤(STS)时间。重建经小脑和假设经额轨迹,并将其转移到共同的 MR 空间,以便与解剖图谱进一步比较。
机器人辅助经小脑活检在儿科和成人患者中均表现出较高的诊断率(96.2%),无手术死亡率,无永久性发病率。仅有 3.8%的病例出现短暂性神经恶化。经小脑轨迹使用小脑Ⅰ或Ⅱ脚和中脑脑桥通过宽立体定向通道,长度为 48.4±7.3mm。平均 STS 时间为 49.5±23.7 分钟,两种机器人系统之间存在显著差异(p=0.017)。TFA 的特点是轨迹更长(107.4±11.8mm,p<0.001),且影响多个功能区。与经小脑轨迹相比,经额靶点位置明显更内侧(-3.4±7.2mm,p=0.042)和更前(-3.9±8.4mm,p=0.048)。
机器人辅助经小脑立体定向术可以通过避免 TFA 和传统框架立体定向术的限制来提高脑干活检的风险效益比。精确的配准和解剖功能轨迹选择对于降低死亡率和发病率至关重要。