Li Chaoxi, Wu Shiqiang, Huang Kuan, Li Ran, Jiang Wei, Wang Junwen, Shu Kai, Lei Ting
Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430034, China.
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 20;13(2):362. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020362.
Brainstem tumors are rare and extremely heterogeneous and present significant challenges in surgical treatment. Thus, biopsies often set the foundation for the diagnosis of brainstem tumors. Multimodal, image-guided, robot-assisted frameless stereotactic biopsies are increasingly popular in neurosurgery centers. This study aimed to compare the safety, efficacy, and duration of the Remebot robot-assisted (Remebot) frameless brainstem tumor biopsy versus those of frame-based stereotactic biopsy.
A retrospective analysis of 33 patients with brainstem tumors who underwent stereotactic brainstem biopsies in the department of neurosurgery from January 2016 to January 2021 was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups: the Remebot group ( = 22) and the frame-based group ( = 11). The clinical characteristics, trajectory strategy, duration of procedure, diagnostic yielding, histopathological diagnosis, and postoperative complications were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the groups.
More pediatric patients performed Remebot frameless brainstem tumor biopsy than frame-based biopsy, with a mean age of 17.3 ± 18.7 vs. 32.8 ± 17.1 ( = 0.027). The diagnostic yield had no significant difference in the two groups, with the diagnostic yield of frame-based biopsy and Remebot frameless brain biopsy being 90.9% and 95.5%, respectively. The time of the total process was 124.5 min for the frame-based biopsy and 84.7 min for the Remebot frameless brain biopsy ( < 0.001). There were no significant differences with respect to the occurrence of complication or the duration of the operation between the two groups.
Remebot frameless stereotactic brainstem biopsy is as safe and efficacious as frame-based stereotactic biopsy. However, Remebot frameless biopsy can reduce the total duration of the procedure and has better application in young pediatric patients. Remebot frameless stereotactic biopsies can be a better option towards the safe and efficient treatment of brainstem tumors.
脑干肿瘤罕见且异质性极强,给手术治疗带来巨大挑战。因此,活检常为脑干肿瘤的诊断奠定基础。多模态、图像引导、机器人辅助的无框架立体定向活检在神经外科中心越来越受欢迎。本研究旨在比较Remebot机器人辅助的无框架脑干肿瘤活检与基于框架的立体定向活检的安全性、有效性和操作时长。
对2016年1月至2021年1月在神经外科接受立体定向脑干活检的33例脑干肿瘤患者进行回顾性分析。患者分为两组:Remebot组(n = 22)和基于框架组(n = 11)。对两组患者的临床特征、穿刺路径策略、手术时长、诊断阳性率、组织病理学诊断及术后并发症进行回顾性分析和比较。
进行Remebot无框架脑干肿瘤活检的儿童患者多于基于框架活检的患者,平均年龄分别为17.3±18.7岁和32.8±17.1岁(P = 0.027)。两组的诊断阳性率无显著差异,基于框架活检和Remebot无框架脑活检的诊断阳性率分别为90.9%和95.5%。基于框架活检的整个过程时间为124.5分钟,Remebot无框架脑活检为84.7分钟(P < 0.001)。两组在并发症发生率或手术时长方面无显著差异。
Remebot无框架立体定向脑干活检与基于框架的立体定向活检一样安全有效。然而,Remebot无框架活检可缩短整个手术时长,在低龄儿童患者中应用效果更佳。Remebot无框架立体定向活检可能是安全、高效治疗脑干肿瘤的更好选择。