Suppr超能文献

机器人引导与徒手透视引导微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术:单中心、观察性、病例对照研究。

Robot-guided versus freehand fluoroscopy-guided minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-institution, observational, case-control study.

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery, Shuang-Ho Hospital-Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City.

2Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2022 Jan;52(1):E9. doi: 10.3171/2021.10.FOCUS21514.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The use of robotics in spinal surgery has gained popularity because of its promising accuracy and safety. ROSA is a commonly used surgical robot system for spinal surgery. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between robot-guided and freehand fluoroscopy-guided instrumentation in minimally invasive surgery (MIS)-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

METHODS

This retrospective consecutive series reviewed 224 patients who underwent MIS-TLIF from March 2019 to April 2020 at a single institution. All patients were diagnosed with degenerative pathologies. Of those, 75 patients underwent robot-guided MIS-TLIF, and 149 patients underwent freehand fluoroscopy-guided MIS-TLIF. The incidences of pedicle breach, intraoperative outcomes, postoperative outcomes, and short-term pain control were compared.

RESULTS

The patients who underwent robot-guided surgery had a lower incidence of pedicle breach (0.27% vs 1.75%, p = 0.04) and less operative blood loss (313.7 ± 214.1 mL vs 431.6 ± 529.8 mL, p = 0.019). Nonsignificant differences were observed in operative duration (280.7 ± 98.1 minutes vs 251.4 ± 112.0 minutes, p = 0.056), hospital stay (6.6 ± 3.4 days vs 7.3 ± 4.4 days, p = 0.19), complications (intraoperative, 1.3% vs 1.3%, p = 0.45; postoperative surgery-related, 4.0% vs 4.0%, p = 0.99), and short-term pain control (postoperative day 1, 2.1 ± 1.2 vs 1.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.144; postoperative day 30, 1.2 ± 0.5 vs 1.3 ± 0.7, p = 0.610). A shorter operative duration for 4-level spinal surgery was found in the robot-guided surgery group (388.7 ± 107.3 minutes vs 544.0 ± 128.5 minutes, p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective review revealed that patients who underwent robot-guided MIS-TLIF experienced less operative blood loss. They also benefited from a shorter operative duration with higher-level (> 3 levels) spinal surgery. The postoperative outcomes were similar for both robot-guided and freehand fluoroscopy-guided procedures.

摘要

目的

机器人在脊柱外科中的应用因其准确性和安全性高而受到青睐。ROSA 是一种常用于脊柱外科的手术机器人系统。本研究旨在比较微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)中机器人引导与徒手透视引导器械的结果。

方法

本回顾性连续系列研究纳入了 2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 4 月在一家机构接受 MIS-TLIF 的 224 例患者。所有患者均被诊断为退行性病变。其中,75 例患者接受机器人辅助 MIS-TLIF,149 例患者接受徒手透视引导 MIS-TLIF。比较了椎弓根破裂、术中结果、术后结果和短期疼痛控制的发生率。

结果

机器人辅助手术组椎弓根破裂发生率较低(0.27% vs 1.75%,p=0.04),术中出血量较少(313.7±214.1 mL vs 431.6±529.8 mL,p=0.019)。手术时间(280.7±98.1 分钟 vs 251.4±112.0 分钟,p=0.056)、住院时间(6.6±3.4 天 vs 7.3±4.4 天,p=0.19)、并发症(术中,1.3% vs 1.3%,p=0.45;术后手术相关,4.0% vs 4.0%,p=0.99)和短期疼痛控制(术后第 1 天,2.1±1.2 vs 1.8±1.2,p=0.144;术后第 30 天,1.2±0.5 vs 1.3±0.7,p=0.610)差异均无统计学意义。机器人辅助手术组 4 级脊柱手术的手术时间更短(388.7±107.3 分钟 vs 544.0±128.5 分钟,p=0.047)。

结论

本回顾性研究表明,机器人辅助 MIS-TLIF 可减少术中出血量。对于高位(>3 节段)脊柱手术,他们还受益于更短的手术时间。机器人引导和徒手透视引导程序的术后结果相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验