The impact of robotic assistance for lumbar fusion surgery on 90-day surgical outcomes and 1-year revisions.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the (1) 90-day surgical outcomes and (2) 1-year revision rate of robotic versus nonrobotic lumbar fusion surgery.

METHODS

Patients >18 years of age who underwent primary lumbar fusion surgery at our institution were identified and propensity-matched in a 1:1 fashion based on robotic assistance during surgery. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and surgical outcomes, including 90-day surgical complications and 1-year revisions, were collected. Multivariable regression analysis was performed. Significance was set to < 0.05.

RESULTS

Four hundred and fifteen patients were identified as having robotic lumbar fusion and were matched to a control group. Bivariant analysis revealed no significant difference in total 90-day surgical complications ( = 0.193) or 1-year revisions ( = 0.178). The operative duration was longer in robotic surgery (287 + 123 vs. 205 + 88.3, ≤ 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that robotic fusion was not a significant predictor of 90-day surgical complications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.76 [0.32-1.67], = 0.499) or 1-year revisions (OR = 0.58 [0.28-1.18], = 0.142). Other variables identified as the positive predictors of 1-year revisions included levels fused (OR = 1.26 [1.08-1.48], = 0.004) and current smokers (OR = 3.51 [1.46-8.15], = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that robotic-assisted and nonrobotic-assisted lumbar fusions are associated with a similar risk of 90-day surgical complications and 1-year revision rates; however, robotic surgery does increase time under anesthesia.