Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Buenteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany (Haunhorst, Bienert-Zeit); Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 382 West Street Road, Kennett Square, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19348, USA (Hopster); Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 11, 06120 Halle, Germany (Schmicke); Small Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Buenteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany (Kästner).
Can Vet J. 2022 Jan;63(1):39-46.
The objective of this study was to compare effects of butorphanol (BUT) or buprenorphine (BUP), in combination with detomidine and diazepam, on the sedation quality, surgical conditions, and postoperative pain control after cheek tooth extraction in horses, randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups (BUT: = 20; BUP: = 20). A bolus of detomidine (15 μg/kg, IV) was followed by either BUP (7.5 μg/kg, IV) or BUT (0.05 mg/kg, IV). After 20 min, diazepam (0.01 mg/kg, IV) was administered and sedation was maintained with a detomidine IV infusion (20 μg/kg/h), with rate adjusted based on scores to 5 variables. All horses received a nerve block (maxillary or mandibular), and gingival infiltration with mepivacaine. Sedation quality was assessed by the surgeon from 1 (excellent) to 10 (surgery not feasible). A pain scoring system (EQUUS-FAP) was used to assess postoperative pain. Serum cortisol concentrations and locomotor activity (pedometers) were measured. Horses in BUP and BUT required a median detomidine infusion rate of 30.2 μg/kg/h (20 to 74.4 μg/kg/h) and 32.2 μg/kg/h (20 to 48.1 μg/kg/h), respectively ( = 0.22). Horses in the BUP group had better sedation quality ( < 0.05) during surgery and higher step counts ( < 0.001) postoperatively. Buprenorphine combined with detomidine provided a more reliable sedation than butorphanol. However, the EQUUS-FAP pain scale became unreliable because of BUP-induced excitement behavior.
本研究的目的是比较丁丙诺啡(BUT)或布比卡因(BUP)与盐酸地托咪定和地西泮联合用于马拔牙后镇静质量、手术条件和术后疼痛控制的效果,随机分为 2 个治疗组(BUT:n = 20;BUP:n = 20)。先静脉注射盐酸地托咪定(15 μg/kg),然后静脉注射 BUP(7.5 μg/kg)或 BUT(0.05 mg/kg)。20 分钟后,静脉注射地西泮(0.01 mg/kg),以 20 μg/kg/h 的速度静脉输注盐酸地托咪定维持镇静,并根据 5 个变量的评分调整速度。所有马均接受神经阻滞(上颌或下颌)和牙龈浸润盐酸甲哌卡因。镇静质量由外科医生从 1(极好)到 10(手术不可行)进行评估。使用疼痛评分系统(EQUUS-FAP)评估术后疼痛。测量血清皮质醇浓度和运动活动(计步器)。BUP 和 BUT 组的马需要中位数为 30.2 μg/kg/h(20 至 74.4 μg/kg/h)和 32.2 μg/kg/h(20 至 48.1 μg/kg/h)的盐酸地托咪定输注率( = 0.22)。BUP 组在手术期间的镇静质量更好(<0.05),术后步数更高(<0.001)。与丁丙诺啡相比,布比卡因与盐酸地托咪定联合使用可提供更可靠的镇静作用。然而,由于 BUP 引起的兴奋行为,EQUUS-FAP 疼痛量表变得不可靠。