Schlechter Chelsey R, Del Fiol Guilherme, Lam Cho Y, Fernandez Maria E, Greene Tom, Yack Melissa, Schulthies Sandra, Nelson Marci, Bohner Claudia, Pruhs Alan, Siaperas Tracey, Kawamoto Kensaku, Gibson Bryan, Nahum-Shani Inbal, Walker Timothy J, Wetter David W
Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States.
Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Address: 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Oct 26;24:101620. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101620. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Community engagement is critical to accelerate and improve implementation of evidence-based interventions to reduce health inequities. Community-engaged dissemination and implementation research (CEDI) emphasizes engaging stakeholders (e.g., community members, practitioners, community organizations, etc.) with diverse perspectives, experience, and expertise to provide tacit community knowledge regarding the local context, priorities, needs, and assets. Importantly, CEDI can help improve health inequities through incorporating unique perspectives from communities experiencing health inequities that have historically been left out of the research process. The community-engagement process that exists in practice can be highly variable, and characteristics of the process are often underreported, making it difficult to discern how engagement of community partners was used to improve implementation. This paper describes the community-engagement process for a multilevel, pragmatic randomized trial to increase the reach and impact of evidence-based tobacco cessation treatment among Community Health Center patients; describes how engagement activities and the resulting partnership informed the development of implementation strategies and improved the research process; and presents lessons learned to inform future CEDI research.
社区参与对于加速和改进基于证据的干预措施的实施以减少健康不平等至关重要。社区参与式传播与实施研究(CEDI)强调让具有不同观点、经验和专业知识的利益相关者(如社区成员、从业者、社区组织等)参与进来,以提供有关当地背景、优先事项、需求和资产的隐性社区知识。重要的是,CEDI可以通过纳入历史上被排除在研究过程之外的经历健康不平等的社区的独特观点来帮助改善健康不平等。实践中存在的社区参与过程可能高度可变,而且该过程的特征往往报告不足,这使得很难辨别社区伙伴的参与是如何用于改进实施的。本文描述了一项多层次、务实随机试验的社区参与过程,该试验旨在扩大社区卫生中心患者中基于证据的戒烟治疗的覆盖面和影响;描述了参与活动以及由此产生的伙伴关系如何为实施策略的制定提供信息并改进研究过程;并介绍了所吸取的经验教训,以为未来的CEDI研究提供参考。