• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定影响底特律都会区综合医疗系统内糖尿病教育项目参与度的因素。

Identifying factors affecting diabetes education program participation within a metro Detroit integrated health system.

作者信息

White Perkins Denise, Milan Pam, Miazek Kimberly, Havstad Suzanne, Wegienka Ganesa

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, One Ford Place, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, One Ford Place, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2021 Nov 18;24:101646. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101646. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101646
PMID:34976695
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8683990/
Abstract

Diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) can help people achieve optimal disease control, yet these services often remain underutilized. People referred to these programs by their provider can become disengaged in the program at several key steps. This study applies Classification and Regression Tree analysis to 3796 people with diabetes at a single health system based in the Detroit metropolitan area who were referred for DSMES provided by the health system to determine demographic patterns of those who were successfully contacted to schedule program intake appointments, those who did not attend their intake appointment, and those who began but did not complete their personalized DSMES program. White people > 43 years of age, those with a prior A1C value > 8.9 and those with Medicaid insurance had the highest rate of not being successfully contacted for their intake appointment. Those who did not attend their intake appointment tended to have Medicaid insurance, be younger than 48 years, and have A1C > 8.1. Within the Medicare or private insurance groups, those who did not attend were more likely to be female, of Black race and not partnered. Older males with a lower A1C (≤8.3%) had the lowest rate (34.0%) of failing to complete their DSMES plan. The data showed that almost half of those referred were not successfully contacted. The overall low completion rate of 13.2% confirms the need to examine factors predictive of participation and completion. This study highlights process improvement changes to improve personalization of outreach and engagement.

摘要

糖尿病自我管理教育与支持(DSMES)有助于人们实现最佳疾病控制,但这些服务的利用率往往仍然较低。由医疗服务提供者转介到这些项目的患者,可能会在几个关键步骤中退出项目。本研究对底特律都会区一个单一医疗系统中被转介接受该医疗系统提供的DSMES的3796名糖尿病患者应用分类与回归树分析,以确定那些成功联系上并安排项目入组预约的患者、那些未参加入组预约的患者以及那些开始但未完成个性化DSMES项目的患者的人口统计学模式。43岁以上的白人、之前糖化血红蛋白(A1C)值>8.9的患者以及有医疗补助保险的患者,未成功联系上进行入组预约的比例最高。那些未参加入组预约的患者往往有医疗补助保险、年龄小于48岁且A1C>8.1。在医疗保险或私人保险组中,未参加的患者更可能是女性、黑人且未婚。A1C较低(≤8.3%)的老年男性未完成DSMES计划的比例最低(34.0%)。数据显示,近一半被转介的患者未成功联系上。13.2%的总体低完成率证实了有必要研究预测参与和完成情况的因素。本研究强调了流程改进措施,以改善外展和参与的个性化程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7329/8683990/fa63f8600e78/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7329/8683990/1f7f04174bf8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7329/8683990/158007c1879b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7329/8683990/fa63f8600e78/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7329/8683990/1f7f04174bf8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7329/8683990/158007c1879b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7329/8683990/fa63f8600e78/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying factors affecting diabetes education program participation within a metro Detroit integrated health system.确定影响底特律都会区综合医疗系统内糖尿病教育项目参与度的因素。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Nov 18;24:101646. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101646. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Identifying individual social needs during intake for diabetes Self-Management education and support services in the Detroit, Michigan area.在密歇根州底特律地区为糖尿病自我管理教育及支持服务进行接待工作时识别个体的社会需求。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Feb 27;40:102671. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102671. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Factors Associated With Receipt of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support for Type 2 Diabetes: Potential for a Population Health Management Approach.与 2 型糖尿病患者接受糖尿病自我管理教育和支持相关的因素:人群健康管理方法的潜力。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Sep;17(5):1198-1205. doi: 10.1177/19322968231176303. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
4
Exploring the Clinical Outcomes of Implementing Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support in a Primary Care Practice: A Quality Improvement Project.探索在基层医疗实践中实施糖尿病自我管理教育与支持的临床结果:一项质量改进项目。
J Dr Nurs Pract. 2023 Jun 27. doi: 10.1891/JDNP-2021-0046.
5
Building a Healthy Temple diabetes self-management education support program in Hispanic faith community settings: A cluster randomized controlled trial.在西班牙裔信仰社区环境中建立健康圣殿糖尿病自我管理教育支持计划:一项集群随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Dec;99:106192. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106192. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
6
Effect of a Primary Care-Based Diabetes Education Model on Provider Referrals and Patient Participation.基于初级保健的糖尿病教育模式对提供者转诊和患者参与的影响。
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2021 Feb;47(1):74-84. doi: 10.1177/0145721720981840.
7
Reach and Effectiveness of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support in a Network of Federally Qualified Health Centers.糖尿病自我管理教育和支持在联邦合格健康中心网络中的可达性和效果。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(1):374-384. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0028.
8
Digital Health Tools and Behavioral Strategies to Increase Engagement With Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support: Design and Feasibility of DM-BOOST.数字健康工具和行为策略增加参与糖尿病自我管理教育和支持:DM-BOOST 的设计和可行性。
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2024 Dec;50(6):497-509. doi: 10.1177/26350106241285829. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
9
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support: Referral and Attendance at a Patient-Centered Medical Home.糖尿病自我管理教育与支持:转诊至以患者为中心的医疗之家并出席
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720967232. doi: 10.1177/2150132720967232.
10
Accessibility of diabetes education in the United States: barriers, policy implications, and the road ahead.美国糖尿病教育的可及性:障碍、政策影响及未来之路
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Aug 21;2(8):qxae097. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae097. eCollection 2024 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying individual social needs during intake for diabetes Self-Management education and support services in the Detroit, Michigan area.在密歇根州底特律地区为糖尿病自我管理教育及支持服务进行接待工作时识别个体的社会需求。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Feb 27;40:102671. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102671. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Report of the American Diabetes Association, the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of PAs, the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, and the American Pharmacists Association.2型糖尿病成人患者的糖尿病自我管理教育与支持:美国糖尿病协会、糖尿病护理与教育专家协会、营养与饮食学会、美国家庭医师学会、美国医师助理学会、美国执业护士协会以及美国药剂师协会的共识报告
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Nov-Dec;60(6):e1-e18. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.04.018. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
2
Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Participation in Diabetes Education among Community-Dwelling Adults with Diabetes.与社区居住的糖尿病成年患者参与糖尿病教育相关的社会人口学因素。
Yonsei Med J. 2020 Feb;61(2):169-178. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.2.169.
3
Challenges for younger adults with diabetes.糖尿病对年轻人的挑战。
Minn Med. 2019 Mar-Apr;102(2):34-36.
4
Integrating psychosocial support into routine diabetes care: perspectives from participants at the Self-Management Alliance meeting 2016.将心理社会支持融入常规糖尿病护理中:2016 年自我管理联盟会议参与者的观点。
Diabet Med. 2019 Jul;36(7):847-853. doi: 10.1111/dme.13836. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
5
Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Engagement in Diabetes Self-management Education Among People With Diabetes in the United States.美国糖尿病患者参与糖尿病自我管理教育的社会人口学因素分析。
Public Health Rep. 2018 Nov;133(6):685-691. doi: 10.1177/0033354918794935. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
6
Patient empowerment: What does it really mean?患者赋权:它究竟意味着什么?
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):1921-1922. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.010.
7
Diabetes self-management education reduces risk of all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病自我管理教育可降低2型糖尿病患者的全因死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endocrine. 2017 Mar;55(3):712-731. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1168-2. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
8
Contributions of Peer Support to Health, Health Care, and Prevention: Papers from Peers for Progress.同伴支持对健康、医疗保健及预防的贡献:“同伴推动进步”项目论文集
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Aug;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1852.
9
Prospective associations between emotional distress and poor outcomes in type 2 diabetes.情绪困扰与 2 型糖尿病不良结局的前瞻性关联。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Dec;35(12):2472-8. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0181. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
10
When is diabetes distress clinically meaningful?: establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale.糖尿病困扰何时具有临床意义?:确立糖尿病困扰量表的切点。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Feb;35(2):259-64. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1572. Epub 2012 Jan 6.