• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病自我管理教育和支持在联邦合格健康中心网络中的可达性和效果。

Reach and Effectiveness of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support in a Network of Federally Qualified Health Centers.

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(1):374-384. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0028.

DOI:10.1353/hpu.2022.0028
PMID:35153227
Abstract

Diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) is an evidence-based intervention to improve diabetes-related outcomes. Access to DSMES is limited for diverse and low-income groups, despite greater need for services to address health disparities. Providing DSMES in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) may increase reach for priority populations, and further study is needed to evaluate this delivery model. This report examines program effectiveness, including outcomes by race/ethnicity and Medicaid status, among 1,247 enrollees in FQHC-based DSMES. There was substantial glycated hemoglobin (A1c) improvement overall (-0.98%) among a diverse, majority-Medicaid population. However, Medicaid beneficiaries were approximately half as likely to attend as other enrollees (p<.001), while Latinx and non-Latinx Black participants attended fewer sessions (p=.008 and p=.040, respectively). Additionally, Medicaid beneficiaries experienced less A1c improvement than others (p=.040). Findings are promising that FQHC-based delivery can increase access to high-quality DSMES, although further effort appears needed to ensure optimal outcomes for all.

摘要

糖尿病自我管理教育和支持(DSMES)是一种基于证据的干预措施,可改善与糖尿病相关的结果。尽管需要更多的服务来解决健康差距,但获得 DSMES 的机会仍然有限,尤其是在多样化和低收入群体中。在联邦合格的健康中心(FQHC)中提供 DSMES 可能会增加优先人群的服务覆盖范围,需要进一步研究来评估这种交付模式。本报告考察了 FQHC 为基础的 DSMES 项目的有效性,包括按种族/族裔和医疗补助状况划分的结果。在一个多样化的、以医疗补助为主的人群中,糖化血红蛋白(A1c)总体上有显著改善(-0.98%)。然而,医疗补助受益人的参与率大约只有其他参与者的一半(p<.001),而拉丁裔和非拉丁裔黑人参与者的参与次数较少(p=.008 和 p=.040,分别)。此外,医疗补助受益人的 A1c 改善程度低于其他人(p=.040)。这些发现表明,基于 FQHC 的服务交付可以增加高质量 DSMES 的可及性,但似乎需要进一步努力,以确保所有人都能获得最佳结果。

相似文献

1
Reach and Effectiveness of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support in a Network of Federally Qualified Health Centers.糖尿病自我管理教育和支持在联邦合格健康中心网络中的可达性和效果。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(1):374-384. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0028.
2
Examining a Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Telemedicine Model With High-Risk Patients in a Rural Community.检查农村社区高危患者的糖尿病自我管理教育和支持远程医疗模式。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Sep;17(5):1190-1197. doi: 10.1177/19322968231180884. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
Quality of Care for US Adults With Medicaid Insurance and Type 2 Diabetes in Federally Qualified Health Centers Compared With Other Primary Care Settings.美国联邦合格健康中心中接受医疗补助保险的 2 型糖尿病成年患者与其他初级保健机构相比的护理质量。
Med Care. 2022 Nov 1;60(11):813-820. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001766. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
4
Health care utilization among beneficiaries with diabetes from federally qualified health centers: Analysis from a Medicaid managed care organization.联邦合格医疗中心的糖尿病受益人的医疗保健利用情况:来自医疗补助管理式医疗组织的分析
Health Mark Q. 2022 Jan-Mar;39(1):74-87. doi: 10.1080/07359683.2021.1995638. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
5
Effectiveness-implementation trial comparing a family model of diabetes self-management education and support with a standard model.比较糖尿病自我管理教育和支持的家庭模式与标准模式的有效性-实施试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Oct;121:106921. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106921. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
6
Building a Healthy Temple diabetes self-management education support program in Hispanic faith community settings: A cluster randomized controlled trial.在西班牙裔信仰社区环境中建立健康圣殿糖尿病自我管理教育支持计划:一项集群随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Dec;99:106192. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106192. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
7
Association of Medicaid Expansion With 5-Year Changes in Hypertension and Diabetes Outcomes at Federally Qualified Health Centers.医疗补助扩张计划与联邦合格健康中心高血压和糖尿病治疗结果 5 年变化的相关性研究。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Sep 10;2(9):e212375. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2375. eCollection 2021 Sep.
8
2022 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.《2022年糖尿病自我管理教育与支持国家标准》
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2022 Feb;48(1):44-59. doi: 10.1177/26350106211072203. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
9
Interdisciplinary speed dating augments diabetes self-management education and support to improve health outcomes.跨学科速配约会增强了糖尿病自我管理教育和支持,以改善健康结果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Nov;103(11):2305-2311. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 May 15.
10
Improving Diabetes Control in a Medicaid Managed Care Population With Complex Needs.改善有复杂需求的医疗补助管理式医疗人群的糖尿病控制状况。
Perm J. 2024 Mar 15;28(1):62-67. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.106. Epub 2023 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Primary Payor Source and Glycemic Control Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病患者的主要支付方来源与血糖控制的关联
PRiMER. 2025 May 19;9:23. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2025.726048. eCollection 2025.
2
The Báa nnilah Program: Results of a Chronic-Illness Self-Management Cluster Randomized Trial with the Apsáalooke Nation.巴那那利自我管理项目:与阿萨巴斯卡部落进行的慢性病自我管理群组随机试验结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 29;21(3):285. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030285.
3
A Multi-Method Study of Patient Reach and Attendance in a Pragmatic Trial of Diabetes Shared Medical Appointments.
一项关于糖尿病共享医疗预约实用试验中患者覆盖范围和就诊率的多方法研究。
Clin Diabetes. 2023 Fall;41(4):526-538. doi: 10.2337/cd23-0015. Epub 2023 Sep 8.