Department of Immunology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Office of the Vice Provost of Research, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 17;9:789402. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.789402. eCollection 2021.
Repeated testing of a population is critical for limiting the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and for the safe reopening of educational institutions such as kindergarten-grade 12 (K-12) schools and colleges. Many screening efforts utilize the CDC RT-PCR based assay which targets two regions of the novel Coronavirus nucleocapsid gene. The standard approach of testing each person individually, however, poses a financial burden to these institutions and is therefore a barrier to using testing for re-opening. Pooling samples from multiple individuals into a single test is an attractive alternate approach that promises significant cost savings-however the specificity and sensitivity of such approaches needs to be assessed prior to deployment. To this end, we conducted a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of analyzing samples in pools of eight by the established RT-PCR assay. Participants (1,576) were recruited from amongst the Tufts University community undergoing regular screening. Each volunteer provided two swabs, one analyzed separately and the other in a pool of eight. Because the positivity rate was very low, we spiked approximately half of the pools with laboratory-generated swabs produced from known positive cases outside the Tufts testing program. The results of pooled tests had 100% correspondence with those of their respective individual tests. We conclude that pooling eight samples does not negatively impact the specificity or sensitivity of the RT-PCR assay and suggest that this approach can be utilized by institutions seeking to reduce surveillance costs.
对人群进行反复检测对于限制 SARS-CoV-2 病毒的传播以及安全重新开放幼儿园至 12 年级(K-12)学校和学院等教育机构至关重要。许多筛选工作都利用了美国疾病预防控制中心基于 RT-PCR 的检测方法,该方法针对新型冠状病毒核衣壳基因的两个区域。然而,对每个人进行单独检测的标准方法给这些机构带来了财务负担,因此成为重新开放使用检测的障碍。将多个个体的样本汇集到一个测试中是一种有吸引力的替代方法,有望节省大量成本——但是,在部署之前,需要评估此类方法的特异性和敏感性。为此,我们进行了一项试点研究,以评估通过既定的 RT-PCR 检测方法分析 8 个样本池的可行性。参与者(1576 人)是从塔夫茨大学社区中正在接受常规筛查的人员中招募的。每位志愿者提供两个拭子,一个单独分析,另一个放入 8 个样本的池中。由于阳性率非常低,我们用来自塔夫茨测试计划之外的已知阳性病例产生的实验室制造拭子对大约一半的样本池进行了加标。汇总测试的结果与各自的单独测试结果完全一致。我们得出结论,汇集 8 个样本不会对 RT-PCR 检测的特异性或敏感性产生负面影响,并建议希望降低监测成本的机构采用这种方法。