Suppr超能文献

快速HIT应用于触摸DNA样本的分析。

Analysis of rapid HIT application to touch DNA samples.

作者信息

Martin Belinda, Kaesler Todd, Linacre Adrian

机构信息

College of Science & Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2022 May;67(3):1233-1240. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14964. Epub 2022 Jan 3.

Abstract

Rapid DNA technology is being utilized for reference profiles worldwide. There is also strong data in the literature to support its use for high-template DNA sources, the same is not true for low-template sources, such as touch DNA; this is a requirement before wider implementation to forensic casework is considered. We report on the Rapid HIT Intel cartridge's ability to facilitate successful amplification of touch DNA to obtain profiles from template deposited on items commonly encountered in forensic casework. Eight items were touched in ten replicates- two were tapelifted, three swabbed, and three directly inserted. Significance was observed in the alleles amplified and RFU with respect to sample type. Three samples performed well: cable tie, fabric, and matchstick. As two of these were directly inserted, this should be considered for any sample small enough. Placement of highly absorbent substrates into the cartridge is not advised as it can cause a lysate-pull error. Heterozygote loci often presented as homozygous (32%-78% loci per profile); this was influenced by substrate type and profile RFU. Loci with larger masses exhibited higher false homozygosity also. Comparison of the donor's profile analyzed was performed against previous datasets analyzing touch DNA through standard workflow, including manual DNA extraction, PCR, and CE separation. These data show that for all substrates, except for a fabric swatch, standard processing is preferential to Rapid HIT analysis. In its current form, rapid DNA technology is not fit for the routine analysis of touch DNA samples in forensic casework.

摘要

快速DNA技术正在全球范围内用于生成参考图谱。文献中也有强有力的数据支持其用于高模板DNA样本,但对于低模板样本(如接触性DNA)而言并非如此;在考虑更广泛地应用于法医案件检验之前,这是一个必要条件。我们报告了Rapid HIT Intel试剂盒促进成功扩增接触性DNA以从法医案件检验中常见物品上沉积的模板获取图谱的能力。对八个物品进行了十次重复触摸——两次用胶带粘取,三次擦拭,三次直接插入。在扩增的等位基因和相对荧光单位(RFU)方面,观察到了样本类型的显著性差异。三个样本表现良好:束线带、织物和火柴棍。由于其中两个样本是直接插入的,对于任何足够小的样本都应考虑这种方法。不建议将高吸水性底物放入试剂盒中,因为这可能会导致裂解物抽吸错误。杂合子位点常呈现为纯合子(每个图谱中32%-78%的位点);这受到底物类型和图谱RFU的影响。质量较大的位点也表现出更高的假纯合性。将分析的供体图谱与之前通过标准流程(包括手动DNA提取、PCR和毛细管电泳分离)分析接触性DNA的数据集进行了比较。这些数据表明,对于所有底物,除了一块织物样本外,标准处理方法优于Rapid HIT分析。就其目前的形式而言,快速DNA技术不适合法医案件检验中接触性DNA样本的常规分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验