Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama, Japan; Toyama Regional Center for JECS, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama, Japan; Toyama Regional Center for JECS, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan; Department of Public Health, Gunma University Graduate school of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
J Affect Disord. 2022 Mar 1;300:540-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.117. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
Despite many epidemiological studies on the relationship between social support during pregnancy and perinatal/postpartum depression, its impact remains unclear. Therefore, this study examined this association using a causal model of risk based on various levels of social support.
Participants were 88,711 mothers in an ongoing nationwide birth cohort study in Japan. Social support during pregnancy was set at four treatment levels. Depressive state was identified twice, with the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6; score ≥ 5) and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; score ≥ 9). With the highest level of social support set as reference, marginal structural models were fitted to derive counterfactual risk ratios (cRRs).
cRRs (95% CIs) for EPDS cases increased as the level of social support decreased, with values of 1.06 (0.99-1.13) for upper-middle, 1.30 (1.23-1.39) for lower-middle, and 1.61 (1.52-1.71) for low. Also, cRRs (95% CIs) at the second measurement (interaction) tended to increase as social support decreased, with values of 1.05 (0.97-1.13) for upper-middle, 1.05 (0.98-1.13) for lower-middle, and 1.10 (1.03-1.18) for low. The same tendency was observed in K6 cases.
Depressive state was identified by self-administered questionnaire.
Lower social support during pregnancy is associated with increased counterfactual risk of perinatal/postpartum depressive state and worsened counterfactual spontaneous recovery over time. These findings highlight the importance of sufficient social support for preventing perinatal/postpartum depression and promoting recovery.
UMIN000030786.
尽管有许多关于怀孕期间社会支持与围产期/产后抑郁之间关系的流行病学研究,但其影响仍不清楚。因此,本研究使用基于各种社会支持水平的风险因果模型来检验这种关联。
参与者为日本一项正在进行的全国性出生队列研究中的 88711 名母亲。怀孕期间的社会支持分为四个治疗水平。使用 Kessler 心理困扰量表(K6;得分≥5)和爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS;得分≥9)两次确定抑郁状态。以最高水平的社会支持为参照,拟合边缘结构模型以得出反事实风险比(cRR)。
EPDS 病例的 cRR(95%CI)随社会支持水平的降低而增加,上中等水平为 1.06(0.99-1.13),中下等水平为 1.30(1.23-1.39),低水平为 1.61(1.52-1.71)。此外,第二次测量(交互作用)的 cRR(95%CI)随着社会支持的降低而趋于增加,上中等水平为 1.05(0.97-1.13),中下等水平为 1.05(0.98-1.13),低水平为 1.10(1.03-1.18)。K6 病例也呈现出相同的趋势。
抑郁状态是通过自我管理问卷确定的。
怀孕期间较低的社会支持与围产期/产后抑郁状态的反事实风险增加以及随着时间的推移反事实自发恢复恶化相关。这些发现强调了足够的社会支持对于预防围产期/产后抑郁和促进恢复的重要性。
UMIN000030786。