• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨科治疗效果评估中计算机自适应测试的前景:患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)应用情况评估

The promise of computer adaptive testing in collection of orthopaedic outcomes: an evaluation of PROMIS utilization.

作者信息

Wong Liam H, Meeker James E

机构信息

School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, 3303 S. Bond Avenue, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Jan 4;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00407-w.

DOI:10.1186/s41687-021-00407-w
PMID:34982280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8727662/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A crucial component to improving patient care is better clinician understanding of patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In orthopaedic surgery, HRQoL assessment instruments such as the NIH developed Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), provide surgeons with a framework to assess how a treatment or medical condition is affecting each patient's HRQoL. PROMIS has been demonstrated as a valuable instrument in many diseases; however, the extent to which orthopaedic surgery subspecialties have used and validated PROMIS measures in peer-reviewed research is unclear.

METHODS

Systematic scoping methodology was used to investigate the characteristics of studies using PROMIS to assess HRQoL measures as orthopaedic surgical outcomes as well as studies validating computerized adaptive test (CAT) PROMIS physical health (PH) domains including: Physical Function (PF), Upper Extremity (UE), Lower Extremity (LE).

RESULTS

A systematic search of PubMed identified 391 publications utilizing PROMIS in orthopaedics; 153 (39%) were PROMIS PH CAT validation publications. One-hundred publications were in Hand and Upper Extremity, 69 in Spine, 44 in Adult Reconstruction, 43 in Foot and Ankle, 43 in Sports, 37 in Trauma, 31 in General orthopaedics, and 24 in Tumor. From 2011 through 2020 there was an upward trend in orthopaedic PROMIS publications each year (range, 1-153) and an increase in studies investigating or utilizing PROMIS PH CAT domains (range, 1-105). Eighty-five percent (n = 130) of orthopaedic surgery PROMIS PH CAT validation publications (n = 153) analyzed PF; 30% (n = 46) analyzed UE; 3% (n = 4) analyzed LE.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMIS utilization within orthopaedics as a whole has significantly increased within the past decade, particularly within PROMIS CAT domains. The existing literature reviewed in this scoping study demonstrates that PROMIS PH CAT domains (PF, UE, and LE) are reliable, responsive, and interpretable in most contexts of patient care throughout all orthopaedic surgery subspecialties. The expanded use of PROMIS CATs in orthopaedic surgery highlights the potential for improved quality of patient care. While challenges of integrating PROMIS into electronic medical records exist, expanded use of PROMIS CAT measurement instruments throughout orthopaedic surgery should be performed. Plain english summary In orthopaedic surgery, health-related quality of life tools such as the NIH developed Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), offer patients an opportunity to better understand their medical condition and be involved in their own care. Additionally, PROMIS provides surgeons with a framework to assess how a treatment or medical condition is affecting each patient's functional status and quality of life. The efficacy of PROMIS has been demonstrated in many diseases; however, its application throughout orthopaedic care has yet to be depicted. This study sought to identify the extent to which all orthopaedic surgery subspecialties have used and validated PROMIS measures in peer-reviewed research in order to identify its potential as an applicable and valuable tool across specialties. We determined that PROMIS utilization has significantly increased within the past decade. The existing literature reviewed in this scoping study demonstrates that the PROMIS computerized adaptive test domains evaluating physical function status are reliable, responsive, and interpretable in most contexts of patient care throughout all orthopaedic surgery subspecialties. Based on these results, this study recommends the expanded and more uniform use of PROMIS computerized adaptive test measurement instruments in the clinical care of orthopaedic patients.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acdb/8727662/b93dc26887ca/41687_2021_407_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acdb/8727662/c0dde97d4330/41687_2021_407_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acdb/8727662/b93dc26887ca/41687_2021_407_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acdb/8727662/c0dde97d4330/41687_2021_407_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acdb/8727662/b93dc26887ca/41687_2021_407_Fig2_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

改善患者护理的一个关键因素是临床医生更好地理解患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。在骨科手术中,诸如美国国立卫生研究院开发的患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)等HRQoL评估工具,为外科医生提供了一个框架,以评估一种治疗方法或疾病状况如何影响每位患者的HRQoL。PROMIS已被证明在许多疾病中是一种有价值的工具;然而,骨科手术亚专业在同行评审研究中使用和验证PROMIS测量方法的程度尚不清楚。

方法

采用系统的范围界定方法,调查使用PROMIS评估HRQoL测量方法作为骨科手术结局的研究特点,以及验证计算机自适应测试(CAT)PROMIS身体健康(PH)领域的研究特点,包括:身体功能(PF)、上肢(UE)、下肢(LE)。

结果

对PubMed进行系统检索,共识别出391篇在骨科中使用PROMIS的出版物;153篇(39%)是PROMIS PH CAT验证出版物。100篇发表于手和上肢领域,69篇发表于脊柱领域,44篇发表于成人重建领域,43篇发表于足踝领域,43篇发表于运动领域,37篇发表于创伤领域,31篇发表于普通骨科领域,24篇发表于肿瘤领域。从2011年到2020年,骨科PROMIS出版物数量逐年呈上升趋势(范围为1 - 153篇),并且研究调查或使用PROMIS PH CAT领域的研究数量也有所增加(范围为1 - 105篇)。85%(n = 130)的骨科手术PROMIS PH CAT验证出版物(n = 153)分析了PF;30%(n = 46)分析了UE;3%(n = 4)分析了LE。

结论

在过去十年中,整个骨科领域对PROMIS的使用显著增加,特别是在PROMIS CAT领域。本范围界定研究中回顾的现有文献表明,PROMIS PH CAT领域(PF、UE和LE)在所有骨科手术亚专业的大多数患者护理背景下都是可靠、敏感且可解释的。PROMIS CAT在骨科手术中的广泛应用凸显了改善患者护理质量的潜力。虽然将PROMIS整合到电子病历中存在挑战,但应在整个骨科手术中更广泛地使用PROMIS CAT测量工具。

简明英语摘要

在骨科手术中,诸如美国国立卫生研究院开发的患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)等与健康相关的生活质量工具,为患者提供了一个更好地了解自身病情并参与自身护理的机会。此外,PROMIS为外科医生提供了一个框架,以评估一种治疗方法或疾病状况如何影响每位患者的功能状态和生活质量。PROMIS的有效性已在许多疾病中得到证明;然而,其在整个骨科护理中的应用情况尚未得到描述。本研究旨在确定所有骨科手术亚专业在同行评审研究中使用和验证PROMIS测量方法的程度,以确定其作为一种适用于各专业且有价值的工具的潜力。我们确定在过去十年中PROMIS的使用显著增加。本范围界定研究中回顾的现有文献表明,评估身体功能状态的PROMIS计算机自适应测试领域在所有骨科手术亚专业的大多数患者护理背景下都是可靠、敏感且可解释的。基于这些结果,本研究建议在骨科患者的临床护理中更广泛、更统一地使用PROMIS计算机自适应测试测量工具。

相似文献

1
The promise of computer adaptive testing in collection of orthopaedic outcomes: an evaluation of PROMIS utilization.骨科治疗效果评估中计算机自适应测试的前景:患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)应用情况评估
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Jan 4;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00407-w.
2
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Instruments Compare Favorably With Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Upper- and Lower-Extremity Orthopaedic Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)身体功能量表与传统患者报告结局量表相比,在上下肢骨科患者中表现更优:一项文献系统综述
Arthroscopy. 2022 Feb;38(2):609-631. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.031. Epub 2021 May 27.
3
What is the Impact of Social Deprivation on Physical and Mental Health in Orthopaedic Patients?社会剥夺对骨科患者身心健康的影响是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Aug;477(8):1825-1835. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000698.
4
Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) Versus Physical Function (PF) Computer Adaptive Tests (CATs) in Upper Extremity Clinics.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)上肢(UE)与身体功能(PF)计算机自适应测试(CATs)在上肢诊所的表现。
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Nov;42(11):867-874. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
5
The minimal clinically important difference of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and upper extremity computer adaptive tests and QuickDASH in the setting of elbow trauma.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)身体功能及上肢计算机自适应测试和QuickDASH在肘部创伤情况下的最小临床重要差异。
JSES Int. 2021 Aug 8;5(6):1132-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.06.005. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test Version 2.0 in a Nonshoulder Hand and Upper Extremity Population.建立非肩部手部和上肢人群中 PROMIS 上肢计算机自适应测试版本 2.0 的最小临床重要差异。
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Oct;46(10):927.e1-927.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.01.023. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
7
Are Social Deprivation and Low Traditional Health Literacy Associated With Higher PROMIS CAT Completion in Orthopaedic Surgery?社会剥夺和低传统健康素养与骨科手术中更高的患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)计算机自适应测试(CAT)完成率相关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Mar 1;482(3):442-454. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002861. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
8
Validating the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerized adaptive tests for upper extremity fracture care.验证患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)计算机自适应测试在上肢骨折护理中的应用。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jul;27(7):1191-1197. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
9
What Are the Floor and Ceiling Effects of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Test Domains in Orthopaedic Patients? A Systematic Review.患者报告结局测量信息系统计算机自适应测试领域在矫形患者中的地板和天花板效应如何?系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Mar;36(3):901-912.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.022. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
10
Determining the Generalizability of the PROMIS Depression Domain's Floor Effect and Completion Time in Patients Undergoing Orthopaedic Surgery.确定接受骨科手术患者的 PROMIS 抑郁量表领域的地板效应和完成时间的可推广性。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Oct;477(10):2215-2225. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000782.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a comprehensive digital wearable tracking system of the patient recovery journey after extremity trauma: a narrative review.迈向肢体创伤后患者康复历程的全面数字可穿戴跟踪系统:一篇叙述性综述
EFORT Open Rev. 2025 Jul 1;10(7):445-453. doi: 10.1530/EOR-2024-0154.
2
Recovery of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures vs Gait Parameters Obtained by Instrumented Insoles After Tibial and Malleolar Fractures: Prospective Longitudinal Observational Study.胫骨和踝关节骨折后患者报告结局测量指标与通过仪器化鞋垫获得的步态参数的恢复情况:前瞻性纵向观察研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jun 16;13:e71022. doi: 10.2196/71022.
3
Branding a New Technological Outlook for Future Orthopaedics.

本文引用的文献

1
Enabling patient-reported outcome measures in clinical trials, exemplified by cardiovascular trials.在临床试验中启用患者报告的结局指标,以心血管试验为例。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jun 13;19(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01800-1.
2
Constructing arguments for the interpretation and use of patient-reported outcome measures in research: an application of modern validity theory.构建用于解释和使用患者报告结局测量的研究证据:现代效度理论的应用。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1715-1722. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02776-7. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
3
A comparison of computer adaptive tests (CATs) and short forms in terms of accuracy and number of items administrated using PROMIS profile.
为未来骨科塑造全新的技术前景。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 May 7;12(5):494. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050494.
4
Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Care-Analyzing Routinely Collected Patient-Reported Outcomes. A Cross-Sectional Study.癌症护理中的城乡差异——分析常规收集的患者报告结局。一项横断面研究。
Cancer Med. 2025 Apr;14(8):e70437. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70437.
5
Longitudinal Evaluation of the HABC Monitor Among Trauma Survivors.创伤幸存者中HABC监测仪的纵向评估
Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Mar 4;20:245-258. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S492210. eCollection 2025.
6
The association of diabetes mellitus and routinely collected patient-reported outcomes in patients with cancer. A real-world cohort study.糖尿病与癌症患者常规采集的患者报告结局之间的关联。一项真实世界的队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(20):e70246. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70246.
7
Orthopaedic Hand Patient Support Systems Have Valuable Insight to Patient Function and Pain.骨科手部患者支持系统对患者的功能和疼痛有宝贵的见解。
J Patient Exp. 2024 Mar 22;11:23743735241240876. doi: 10.1177/23743735241240876. eCollection 2024.
8
Establishing language and ethnic equivalence for health-related quality of life item banks and testing their efficiency via computerised adaptive testing simulations.建立与健康相关的生活质量量表的语言和民族等效性,并通过计算机自适应测试模拟测试其效率。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0298141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298141. eCollection 2024.
9
Analysis of factors associated with patient-reported outcome (PRO) score completion rate one year after shoulder surgeries.肩部手术后一年患者报告结局(PRO)评分完成率相关因素分析。
JSES Int. 2023 Sep 14;8(1):204-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.08.008. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
Effects of increased body mass index on one year outcomes following soft tissue arthroscopic shoulder instability repair.体重指数增加对肩关节镜下软组织不稳定修复术后一年结局的影响。
JSES Int. 2023 May 27;7(5):730-736. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.05.007. eCollection 2023 Sep.
使用 PROMIS 概况比较计算机自适应测验 (CATs) 和简短形式在准确性和施测项目数量方面的差异。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jan;29(1):213-221. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02312-8. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
4
Correlation of PROMIS with Orthopaedic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)与骨科患者报告结局指标的相关性
JBJS Rev. 2019 Aug;7(8):e9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00190.
5
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
Fit for purpose and modern validity theory in clinical outcomes assessment.适用于临床结局评估的目的和现代效度理论。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1711-1720. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1644-z. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
7
Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine.围手术期与疼痛医学领域问卷的开发、翻译及验证指南。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(Suppl 1):S80-S89. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17.
8
What Do You Think You Are Measuring? A Mixed-Methods Procedure for Assessing the Content Validity of Test Items and Theory-Based Scaling.你认为你在测量什么?一种评估测试项目内容效度和基于理论的量表的混合方法程序。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:126. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00126. eCollection 2017.
9
PROMIS for Orthopaedic Outcomes Measurement.用于骨科结局测量的患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Nov;24(11):744-749. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00404.
10
Preoperative PROMIS Scores Predict Postoperative Success in Foot and Ankle Patients.术前PROMIS评分可预测足踝部患者术后疗效。
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Sep;37(9):911-8. doi: 10.1177/1071100716665113. Epub 2016 Aug 16.