• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你认为你在测量什么?一种评估测试项目内容效度和基于理论的量表的混合方法程序。

What Do You Think You Are Measuring? A Mixed-Methods Procedure for Assessing the Content Validity of Test Items and Theory-Based Scaling.

作者信息

Koller Ingrid, Levenson Michael R, Glück Judith

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt Klagenfurt, Austria.

Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:126. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00126. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00126
PMID:28270777
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5318383/
Abstract

The valid measurement of latent constructs is crucial for psychological research. Here, we present a mixed-methods procedure for improving the precision of construct definitions, determining the content validity of items, evaluating the representativeness of items for the target construct, generating test items, and analyzing items on a theoretical basis. To illustrate the mixed-methods content-scaling-structure (CSS) procedure, we analyze the Adult Self-Transcendence Inventory, a self-report measure of wisdom (ASTI, Levenson et al., 2005). A content-validity analysis of the ASTI items was used as the basis of psychometric analyses using multidimensional item response models ( = 1215). We found that the new procedure produced important suggestions concerning five subdimensions of the ASTI that were not identifiable using exploratory methods. The study shows that the application of the suggested procedure leads to a deeper understanding of latent constructs. It also demonstrates the advantages of theory-based item analysis.

摘要

对潜在结构进行有效的测量对心理学研究至关重要。在此,我们提出一种混合方法程序,用于提高结构定义的精确性、确定项目的内容效度、评估项目对于目标结构的代表性、生成测试项目以及在理论基础上分析项目。为了说明混合方法内容-量表-结构(CSS)程序,我们分析了成人自我超越量表,这是一种智慧的自我报告测量工具(成人自我超越量表,莱文森等人,2005年)。对成人自我超越量表项目的内容效度分析被用作使用多维项目反应模型(=1215)进行心理测量分析的基础。我们发现,新程序针对成人自我超越量表的五个子维度提出了重要建议,而这些建议是探索性方法无法识别的。该研究表明,应用所建议的程序能够更深入地理解潜在结构。它还展示了基于理论的项目分析的优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af53/5318383/ec1df37f5c64/fpsyg-08-00126-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af53/5318383/a6aeb2104ef0/fpsyg-08-00126-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af53/5318383/86830741f7fb/fpsyg-08-00126-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af53/5318383/ec1df37f5c64/fpsyg-08-00126-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af53/5318383/a6aeb2104ef0/fpsyg-08-00126-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af53/5318383/86830741f7fb/fpsyg-08-00126-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af53/5318383/ec1df37f5c64/fpsyg-08-00126-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
What Do You Think You Are Measuring? A Mixed-Methods Procedure for Assessing the Content Validity of Test Items and Theory-Based Scaling.你认为你在测量什么?一种评估测试项目内容效度和基于理论的量表的混合方法程序。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:126. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00126. eCollection 2017.
2
What do self-efficacy items measure? Examining the discriminant content validity of self-efficacy items.自我效能感项目测量什么?检验自我效能感项目的区分内容效度。
Br J Health Psychol. 2018 Sep;23(3):597-611. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12306. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
3
What do Demand-Control and Effort-Reward work stress questionnaires really measure? A discriminant content validity study of relevance and representativeness of measures.需求-控制和努力-回报工作压力问卷究竟测量的是什么?一项关于测量的相关性和代表性的判别内容效度研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 May;22(2):295-329. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12232. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
4
Discriminant content validity: a quantitative methodology for assessing content of theory-based measures, with illustrative applications.判别内容效度:一种评估基于理论的测量内容的定量方法及实例应用。
Br J Health Psychol. 2014 May;19(2):240-57. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12095. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
5
How to measure wisdom: content, reliability, and validity of five measures.如何衡量智慧:五种衡量方法的内容、可靠性和有效性。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 12;4:405. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00405. eCollection 2013.
6
Cross-cultural comparison of self-transcendent wisdom between the United States and Korea.美国与韩国之间自我超越智慧的跨文化比较。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2015 Jun;30(2):143-61. doi: 10.1007/s10823-015-9259-8.
7
Development and testing of an instrument to measure contextual factors influencing self-care decisions among adults with chronic illness.开发和测试一种工具,以衡量影响慢性病成人自我护理决策的情境因素。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 May 23;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01990-2.
8
Design and psychometrics of the family caregivers burnout inventory of older adults with chronic disease.慢性疾病老年患者家庭照顾者倦怠量表的设计与心理计量学研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 3;12:1449273. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1449273. eCollection 2024.
9
Development and validation of MyCommunication-Adults, a self-report communicative participation measure.发展和验证 MyCommunication-Adults,一种自我报告的交流参与度测量工具。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Nov-Dec;59(6):2766-2785. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13115. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
10
The 18-item Swedish version of Ryff's psychological wellbeing scale: psychometric properties based on classical test theory and item response theory.Ryff心理幸福感量表的18项瑞典语版本:基于经典测试理论和项目反应理论的心理测量特性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 3;14:1208300. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1208300. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement of mental health recovery knowledge and attitudes of professionals and students: development of the R-KAS tool.专业人员和学生心理健康康复知识与态度的测量:R-KAS工具的开发
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 27;25(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06995-x.
2
Photobiomodulation on vocal training and rehabilitation: Delphi consensus based on experts.光生物调节对嗓音训练与康复的作用:基于专家的德尔菲共识
Codas. 2025 Feb 10;37(2):e20230356. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/e20230356pt. eCollection 2025.
3
Finding the Balance to Quiet the Striving: The Difference Between Successful Aging and Wise Aging.

本文引用的文献

1
An instrument for evaluating clinical teaching in Japan: content validity and cultural sensitivity.日本临床教学评估工具:内容效度与文化敏感性
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Aug 28;14:179. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-179.
2
Discriminant content validity: a quantitative methodology for assessing content of theory-based measures, with illustrative applications.判别内容效度:一种评估基于理论的测量内容的定量方法及实例应用。
Br J Health Psychol. 2014 May;19(2):240-57. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12095. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
3
"Gratitude is with me all the time": how gratitude relates to wisdom.
找到平衡以平息奋斗:成功老龄化与智慧老龄化的差异。
Gerontologist. 2024 Dec 13;65(1). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae126.
4
Crossing horizons: unraveling perspectives on enhancing medical students' success through at-risk factor exploration.跨越界限:通过探索风险因素,揭示提高医学生成功的新视角。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05819-y.
5
Psychometric properties of the modified Drug Abuse Screening Test Sinhala version (DAST-SL): evaluation of reliability and validity in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡改良后的药物滥用筛查测试僧伽罗语版(DAST-SL)的心理测量学特性:可靠性和有效性评估。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 3;24(1):1773. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19288-x.
6
Translation and psychometric evaluation of composite feedback-seeking behavior questionnaire among Iranian medical residents.伊朗住院医师综合反馈寻求行为问卷的翻译及心理计量学评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 29;24(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05586-w.
7
Assessment of adaptive behavior in people with intellectual disabilities: Design and development of a new test battery.智力障碍者适应性行为评估:一种新测试组合的设计与开发
Heliyon. 2024 May 10;10(10):e31048. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31048. eCollection 2024 May 30.
8
Development and content validation of a financial and functional outcomes tool for diabetes-related foot disease in patients undergoing major lower limb amputation: a prospective observational study from Pakistan.发展并验证一种针对主要下肢截肢患者糖尿病足病的财务和功能结局工具:来自巴基斯坦的前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 29;14(3):e080853. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080853.
9
Measuring teacher identity of physicians - a validation study of a questionnaire instrument.测量医师教师身份 - 问卷工具的验证研究。
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2333618. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2333618. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
10
Psychometric evaluation of Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire based on the cognitive apprenticeship model.基于认知学徒模型的马斯特里赫特临床教学问卷的心理测量学评估
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jan 22;12:434. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1528_22. eCollection 2023.
“感恩一直与我同在”:感恩与智慧的关系。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Sep;69(5):655-66. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt123. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
4
How to measure wisdom: content, reliability, and validity of five measures.如何衡量智慧:五种衡量方法的内容、可靠性和有效性。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 12;4:405. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00405. eCollection 2013.
5
Content Validity of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases: An International Delphi Survey.慢性阻塞性肺疾病综合国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心集的内容效度:一项国际德尔菲调查
Open Respir Med J. 2013 Apr 5;7:33-45. doi: 10.2174/1874306401307010033. Print 2013.
6
The social neuroscience of empathy.共情的社会神经科学。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:81-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418.x.
7
Content validity in the PROMIS social-health domain: a qualitative analysis of focus-group data.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)社会健康领域的内容效度:焦点小组数据的定性分析
Qual Life Res. 2008 Jun;17(5):737-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9352-3. Epub 2008 May 14.
8
Measuring the character strength of wisdom.衡量智慧的性格优势。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2007;65(2):163-83. doi: 10.2190/AG.65.2.d.
9
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.CVI(内容效度指数)是内容效度的可接受指标吗?评估与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199.
10
A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability.用于测试效度和信度的心理测量工具箱。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x.