• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对接受抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的患者的 CD4 计数趋势进行建模:肯尼亚内罗毕的一家综合性医疗诊所。

Modelling trends of CD4 counts for patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART): a comprehensive health care clinic in Nairobi, Kenya.

机构信息

Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O BOX 62000, 00200, Nairobi, Kenya.

CENSTAT, Universitiet Hasselt, Agoralaan, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 4;22(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06977-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-021-06977-w
PMID:34983418
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8725499/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In resource-limited settings, changes in CD4 counts constitute an important component in patient monitoring and evaluation of treatment response as these patients do not have access to routine viral load testing. In this study, we quantified trends on CD4 counts in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in a comprehensive health care clinic in Kenya between 2011 and 2017. We evaluated the rate of change in CD4 cell count in response to antiretroviral treatment. We further assessed factors that influenced time to treatment change focusing on baseline characteristics of the patients and different initial drug regimens used. This was a retrospective study involving 432 naïve HIV patients that had at least two CD4 count measurements for the period. The relationship between CD4 cell count and time was modeled using a semi parametric mixed effects model while the Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess factors associated with the first regimen change.

RESULTS

Majority of the patients were females and the average CD4 count at start of treatment was 362.1 [Formula: see text]. The CD4 count measurements increased nonlinearly over time and these trends were similar regardless of the treatment regimen administered to the patients. The change of logarithm CD4 cell count rises fast for in the first 450 days of antiretroviral initiation. The average time to first regimen change was 2142 days. Tenoforvir (TDF) based regimens had a lower drug substitution(aHR 0.2682, 95% CI:0.08263- 0.8706) compared to Zidovudine(AZT).

CONCLUSION

The backbone used was found to be associated with regimen changes among the patients with fewer switches being observed, with the use of TDF when compared to AZT. There was however no significant difference between TDF and AZT in terms of the rate of change in logarithm CD4 count over time.

摘要

背景

在资源有限的环境下,CD4 计数的变化是患者监测和评估治疗反应的重要组成部分,因为这些患者无法进行常规病毒载量检测。在这项研究中,我们量化了肯尼亚一家综合保健诊所中接受高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)的患者在 2011 年至 2017 年期间 CD4 计数的趋势。我们评估了抗逆转录病毒治疗对 CD4 细胞计数变化的反应速度。我们进一步评估了影响治疗改变时间的因素,重点关注患者的基线特征和不同的初始药物方案。这是一项回顾性研究,涉及 432 名初次接受 HIV 治疗的患者,这些患者在该期间至少有两次 CD4 计数测量。使用半参数混合效应模型对 CD4 细胞计数与时间之间的关系进行建模,同时使用 Cox 比例风险模型评估与首次方案改变相关的因素。

结果

大多数患者为女性,治疗开始时的平均 CD4 计数为 362.1[公式:见正文]。CD4 计数随着时间的推移呈非线性增加,这些趋势与给予患者的治疗方案无关。在抗逆转录病毒治疗开始后的 450 天内,对数 CD4 细胞计数的变化迅速增加。首次方案改变的平均时间为 2142 天。与齐多夫定(AZT)相比,替诺福韦(TDF)为基础的方案发生药物替代的可能性较低(aHR 0.2682,95%CI:0.08263-0.8706)。

结论

研究发现,患者使用的骨干药物与方案改变有关,与 AZT 相比,使用 TDF 的方案改变较少。然而,在 CD4 计数对数随时间变化的速度方面,TDF 与 AZT 之间没有显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/3ff70d6a0d18/12879_2021_6977_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/ca8f8d3d3958/12879_2021_6977_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/d00be385774e/12879_2021_6977_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/4afd5c461336/12879_2021_6977_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/365e6de96447/12879_2021_6977_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/6ca1c1739f14/12879_2021_6977_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/07ee2936dd4e/12879_2021_6977_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/2e943e0e4e9a/12879_2021_6977_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/5332cac42965/12879_2021_6977_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/3ff70d6a0d18/12879_2021_6977_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/ca8f8d3d3958/12879_2021_6977_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/d00be385774e/12879_2021_6977_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/4afd5c461336/12879_2021_6977_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/365e6de96447/12879_2021_6977_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/6ca1c1739f14/12879_2021_6977_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/07ee2936dd4e/12879_2021_6977_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/2e943e0e4e9a/12879_2021_6977_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/5332cac42965/12879_2021_6977_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ff/8725499/3ff70d6a0d18/12879_2021_6977_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Modelling trends of CD4 counts for patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART): a comprehensive health care clinic in Nairobi, Kenya.对接受抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的患者的 CD4 计数趋势进行建模:肯尼亚内罗毕的一家综合性医疗诊所。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 4;22(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06977-w.
2
Immunological outcomes of Tenofovir versus Zidovudine-based regimens among people living with HIV/AIDS: a two years retrospective cohort study.替诺福韦与齐多夫定治疗方案对艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者免疫结局的影响:一项两年回顾性队列研究
AIDS Res Ther. 2017 Feb 1;14(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12981-017-0132-4.
3
Comparison of tenofovir, zidovudine, or stavudine as part of first-line antiretroviral therapy in a resource-limited-setting: a cohort study.在资源有限的环境中,作为一线抗逆转录病毒治疗一部分的替诺福韦、齐多夫定或司他夫定的比较:一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2013 May 14;8(5):e64459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064459. Print 2013.
4
CD4 count-based failure criteria combined with viral load monitoring may trigger worse switch decisions than viral load monitoring alone.基于CD4细胞计数的失败标准与病毒载量监测相结合,可能会比单独进行病毒载量监测引发更糟糕的换药决策。
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Feb;21(2):219-23. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12639. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
5
Predictive factors for immunological and virological endpoints in Thai patients receiving combination antiretroviral treatment.接受联合抗逆转录病毒治疗的泰国患者免疫和病毒学终点的预测因素。
HIV Med. 2007 Jan;8(1):46-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2007.00427.x.
6
CD4+ cell count, viral load, and highly active antiretroviral therapy use are independent predictors of body composition alterations in HIV-infected adults: a longitudinal study.CD4 +细胞计数、病毒载量及高效抗逆转录病毒疗法的使用是HIV感染成人身体成分改变的独立预测因素:一项纵向研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Dec 1;41(11):1662-70. doi: 10.1086/498022. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
7
Durability of first-line antiretroviral regimens in the era of integrase inhibitors: a cohort of HIV-positive individuals in Spain, 2014-2015.整合酶抑制剂时代一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的持久性:2014 - 2015年西班牙一组HIV阳性个体的情况
Antivir Ther. 2019;24(3):167-175. doi: 10.3851/IMP3297.
8
Study of the impact of HIV genotypic drug resistance testing on therapy efficacy.人类免疫缺陷病毒基因耐药性检测对治疗效果的影响研究。
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2001;63(5):447-73.
9
Treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children is associated with a sustained effect on growth.对感染1型人类免疫缺陷病毒的儿童采用高效抗逆转录病毒疗法进行治疗,与对生长的持续影响相关。
Pediatrics. 2002 Feb;109(2):E25. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.2.e25.
10
Implementation of an antiretroviral access program for HIV-1-infected individuals in resource-limited settings: clinical results from 4 African countries.在资源有限地区为感染HIV-1的个体实施抗逆转录病毒治疗项目:来自4个非洲国家的临床结果
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007 Mar 1;44(3):262-7. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31802bf109.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative assessment of CD4 recovery in a cohort of patients on different HAART regimens in a Nigerian tertiary healthcare facility.在尼日利亚一家三级医疗机构中,对接受不同高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)方案的一组患者的CD4恢复情况进行比较评估。
Afr Health Sci. 2024 Jun;24(2):10-18. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v24i2.3.
2
Mapping of the Antinuclear Autoantibodies in Sudanese patients infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus after HAART receiving: A cross-sectional study.接受高效抗逆转录病毒治疗后感染人类免疫缺陷病毒的苏丹患者抗核自身抗体的图谱分析:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06389-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Zidovudine and Tenofovir Based Regimens With Regard to Health-Related Quality of Life and Prevalence of Symptoms in HIV Patients in a Kenyan Referral Hospital.在肯尼亚一家转诊医院中,齐多夫定和替诺福韦治疗方案对HIV患者健康相关生活质量及症状发生率的比较
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Oct 12;9:984. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00984. eCollection 2018.
2
Motives for change of first-line antiretroviral therapy regimens in an unselected cohort of HIV/AIDS patients at a major referral centre in South-west Cameroon.喀麦隆西南部一家主要转诊中心未经挑选的艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者队列中一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案变更的动机
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Nov 28;10(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2948-3.
3
Immunological outcomes of Tenofovir versus Zidovudine-based regimens among people living with HIV/AIDS: a two years retrospective cohort study.
替诺福韦与齐多夫定治疗方案对艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者免疫结局的影响:一项两年回顾性队列研究
AIDS Res Ther. 2017 Feb 1;14(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12981-017-0132-4.
4
Modeling Outcomes of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy and Rate of CD4 Counts Change among a Cohort of HIV/AIDS Patients in Ethiopia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.埃塞俄比亚一组艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者一线抗逆转录病毒治疗结果及CD4细胞计数变化率的建模:一项回顾性队列研究
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 20;11(12):e0168323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168323. eCollection 2016.
5
Efavirenz or nevirapine in three-drug combination therapy with two nucleoside or nucleotide-reverse transcriptase inhibitors for initial treatment of HIV infection in antiretroviral-naïve individuals.依非韦伦或奈韦拉平与两种核苷类或核苷酸类逆转录酶抑制剂联合用于初治抗逆转录病毒治疗的HIV感染者的初始治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 10;12(12):CD004246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004246.pub4.
6
Has the phasing out of stavudine in accordance with changes in WHO guidelines led to a decrease in single-drug substitutions in first-line antiretroviral therapy for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa?按照世界卫生组织指南的变化逐步淘汰司他夫定,是否导致撒哈拉以南非洲地区用于治疗艾滋病毒的一线抗逆转录病毒疗法中的单药替代情况减少?
AIDS. 2017 Jan 2;31(1):147-157. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001307.
7
Causes for antiretroviral regimen change among HIV/AIDS patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴HIV/AIDS患者抗逆转录病毒治疗方案变更的原因
Tanzan J Health Res. 2013 Jan;15(1):11-8. doi: 10.4314/thrb.v15i1.2.
8
Long-term CD4+ cell count in response to combination antiretroviral therapy.长期联合抗逆转录病毒治疗后的 CD4+ 细胞计数。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 2;9(4):e93039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093039. eCollection 2014.
9
Comparing the effectiveness of efavirenz and nevirapine for first-line antiretroviral therapy in a South African multicentre cohort.比较依非韦伦和奈韦拉平在南非多中心队列中用于一线抗逆转录病毒治疗的有效性。
Int Health. 2013 Jun;5(2):132-8. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/iht002.
10
Outcomes for efavirenz versus nevirapine-containing regimens for treatment of HIV-1 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.依非韦伦与含奈韦拉平方案治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒 1 型感染的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e68995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068995. Print 2013.