Suppr超能文献

二维成像测量的髋臼参数与CT测量结果相关吗?外侧中心边缘角能否预测股骨头覆盖情况?

Do acetabular parameters measured on 2D imaging correlate with CT, and can lateral centre-edge angle predict femoral head coverage?

作者信息

Salih Saif, Grammatopoulos George, Burns Sophia, Hall-Craggs Margaret, Witt Johan

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.

Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Bone Jt Open. 2022 Jan;3(1):12-19. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.31.BJO-2021-0130.R1.

Abstract

AIMS

The lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) is a plain radiological measure of superolateral cover of the femoral head. This study aims to establish the correlation between 2D radiological and 3D CT measurements of acetabular morphology, and to describe the relationship between LCEA and femoral head cover (FHC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 353 periacetabular osteotomies (PAOs) performed between January 2014 and December 2017. Overall, 97 hips in 75 patients had 3D analysis by Clinical Graphics, giving measurements for LCEA, acetabular index (AI), and FHC. Roentgenographical LCEA, AI, posterior wall index (PWI), and anterior wall index (AWI) were measured from supine AP pelvis radiographs. The correlation between CT and roentgenographical measurements was calculated. Sequential multiple linear regression was performed to determine the relationship between roentgenographical measurements and CT FHC.

RESULTS

CT-measured LCEA and AI correlated strongly with roentgenographical LCEA ( = 0.92; p < 0.001) and AI ( = 0.83; p < 0.001). Radiological LCEA correlated very strongly with CT FHC ( = 0.92; p < 0.001). The sum of AWI and PWI also correlated strongly with CTFHC ( = 0.73; p < 0.001). CT measurements of LCEA and AI were 3.4° less and 2.3° greater than radiological LCEA and AI measures. There was a linear relation between radiological LCEA and CT FHC. The linear regression model statistically significantly predicted FHC from LCEA, F(1,96) = 545.1 (p < 0.001), adjusted R = 85.0%, with the prediction equation: CT FHC(%) = 42.1 + 0.77(XRLCEA).

CONCLUSION

CT and roentgenographical measurement of acetabular parameters are comparable. Currently, a radiological LCEA greater than 25° is considered normal. This study demonstrates that those with hip pain and normal radiological acetabular parameters may still have deficiencies in FHC. More sophisticated imaging techniques such as 3D CT should be considered for those with hip pain to identify deficiencies in FHC. Cite this article:  2022;3(1):12-19.

摘要

目的

外侧中心边缘角(LCEA)是股骨头外上覆盖情况的一项普通放射学测量指标。本研究旨在确定髋臼形态的二维放射学测量与三维CT测量之间的相关性,并描述LCEA与股骨头覆盖(FHC)之间的关系。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2014年1月至2017年12月期间进行的353例髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)。总体而言,75例患者的97个髋关节通过临床图形软件进行了三维分析,得出了LCEA、髋臼指数(AI)和FHC的测量值。仰卧位骨盆前后位X线片测量了放射学LCEA、AI、后壁指数(PWI)和前壁指数(AWI)。计算CT测量值与放射学测量值之间的相关性。进行序贯多元线性回归以确定放射学测量值与CT FHC之间的关系。

结果

CT测量的LCEA和AI与放射学LCEA(r = 0.92;p < 0.001)和AI(r = 0.83;p < 0.001)高度相关。放射学LCEA与CT FHC高度相关(r = 0.92;p < 0.001)。AWI和PWI之和也与CT FHC高度相关(r = 0.73;p < 0.001)。CT测量的LCEA和AI分别比放射学LCEA和AI测量值小3.4°和大2.3°。放射学LCEA与CT FHC之间存在线性关系。线性回归模型从LCEA对FHC进行统计显著预测,F(1,96) = 545.1(p < 0.001),调整后R = 85.0%,预测方程为:CT FHC(%) = 42.1 + 0.77(XRLCEA)。

结论

髋臼参数的CT测量与放射学测量具有可比性。目前,放射学LCEA大于25°被认为是正常的。本研究表明,有髋关节疼痛且放射学髋臼参数正常的患者在FHC方面仍可能存在不足。对于有髋关节疼痛的患者,应考虑使用更先进的成像技术如三维CT来识别FHC的不足。引用本文:2022;3(1):12 - 19。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f49/9047077/165afcf09916/BJO-3-12-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验