Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), Red Sea Research Center (RSRC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technologygrid.45672.32 (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milangrid.4708.b, Milan, Italy.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0158021. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01580-21. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
Stress-associated dysbiosis of microbiome can have several configurations that, under an energy landscape conceptual framework, can change from one configuration to another due to different alternating selective forces. It has been proposed-according to the Anna Karenina Principle-that in stressed individuals the microbiome are more dispersed (i.e., with a higher within-beta diversity), evidencing the grade of dispersion as indicator of microbiome dysbiosis. We hypothesize that although dysbiosis leads to different microbial communities in terms of beta diversity, these are not necessarily differently dispersed (within-beta diversity), but they form disrupted networks that make them less resilient to stress. To test our hypothesis, we select nutrient restriction (NR) stress that impairs host fitness but does not introduce overt microbiome selectors, such as toxic compounds and pathogens. We fed the polyphagous black soldier fly, , with two NR diets and a control full-nutrient (FN) diet. NR diets were dysbiotic because they strongly affected insect growth and development, inducing significant microscale changes in physiochemical conditions of the gut compartments. NR diets established new configurations of the gut microbiome compared to FN-fed guts but with similar dispersion. However, these new configurations driven by the deterministic changes induced by NR diets were reflected in rarefied, less structured, and less connected bacterial interactomes. These results suggested that while the dispersion cannot be considered a consistent indicator of the unhealthy state of dysbiotic microbiomes, the capacity of the community members to maintain network connections and stability can be an indicator of the microbial dysbiotic conditions and their incapacity to sustain the holobiont resilience and host homeostasis. Changes in diet play a role in reshaping the gut microbiome in animals, inducing dysbiotic configurations of the associated microbiome. Although studies have reported on the effects of specific nutrient contents on the diet, studies regarding the conditions altering the microbiome configurations and networking in response to diet changes are limited. Our results showed that nutrient poor diets determine dysbiotic states of the host with reduction of insect weight and size, and increase of the times for developmental stage. Moreover, the poor nutrient diets lead to changes in the compositional diversity and network interaction properties of the gut microbial communities. Our study adds a new component to the understanding of the ecological processes associated with dysbiosis, by disentangling consequences of diets on microbiome dysbiosis that is manifested with the disruption of microbiome networking properties rather than changes in microbiome dispersion and beta diversity.
应激相关的微生物组失调可能有几种状态,根据能量景观概念框架,由于不同的交替选择力,这些状态可以从一种状态转变为另一种状态。根据安娜·卡列尼娜原则,有人提出,在应激个体中,微生物组更为分散(即β多样性更高),这表明微生物组失调的程度是分散的指标。我们假设,尽管失调会导致微生物群落在β多样性方面存在差异,但这些群落不一定分散程度不同(β多样性内),而是形成了中断的网络,使它们对压力的抵抗力降低。为了验证我们的假设,我们选择营养限制(NR)应激,这种应激会损害宿主适应性,但不会引入明显的微生物选择剂,如有毒化合物和病原体。我们用两种 NR 饮食和一种对照全营养(FN)饮食喂养多食性黑蝇。NR 饮食是失调的,因为它们强烈影响昆虫的生长和发育,导致肠道隔室的生理化学条件发生显著的微观变化。与 FN 喂养的肠道相比,NR 饮食建立了新的肠道微生物组配置,但分散度相似。然而,这些由 NR 饮食诱导的确定性变化驱动的新配置反映在稀疏、结构较少和连接较少的细菌相互作用网络中。这些结果表明,虽然分散度不能被认为是失调微生物组不健康状态的一致指标,但群落成员维持网络连接和稳定性的能力可以作为微生物失调条件的指标,以及它们维持整个生物群落的弹性和宿主内稳态的能力的指标。饮食的变化在动物中起着重塑肠道微生物组的作用,诱导相关微生物组的失调配置。尽管已经有研究报道了特定营养成分对饮食的影响,但关于饮食变化如何改变微生物组的配置和网络连接的研究是有限的。我们的结果表明,营养匮乏的饮食会导致宿主出现失调状态,表现为昆虫体重和体型减小,发育阶段时间增加。此外,贫瘠的营养饮食会导致肠道微生物群落的组成多样性和网络相互作用特性发生变化。我们的研究通过阐明饮食对微生物组失调的影响,为理解与失调相关的生态过程增加了一个新的组成部分,这种影响表现为微生物组网络连接特性的破坏,而不是微生物组分散度和β多样性的变化。