• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替换供应商 QTc 警报与定制 QTc 风险警报在住院患者中的效果。

Effect of Replacing Vendor QTc Alerts with a Custom QTc Risk Alert in Inpatients.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, United States.

Department of Pharmacy Services, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):19-29. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740483. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1740483
PMID:34986493
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8731239/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to implement a customized QTc interval clinical decision support (CDS) alert strategy in our electronic health record for hospitalized patients and aimed at providers with the following objectives: minimize QTc prolongation, minimize exposure to QTc prolonging medications, and decrease overall QTc-related alerts. A strategy that was based on the validated QTc risk scoring tool and replacing medication knowledge vendor alerts with custom QTc prolongation alerts was implemented.

METHODS

This is a retrospective quasi-experimental study with a pre-intervention period (August 2019 to October 2019) and post-intervention period (December 2019 to February 2020). The custom alert was implemented in November 2019.

RESULTS

In the pre-implementation group, 361 (19.3%) patients developed QTc prolongation, and in the post-implementation group, 357 (19.6%) patients developed QTc prolongation (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87-1.20,  = 0.81). The odds ratio of an action taken post-implementation compared with pre-implementation was 18.90 (95% CI: 14.03-25.47, <0. 001). There was also a decrease in total orders for QTc prolonging medications from 7,921 (5.5%) to 7,566 (5.3%) with an odds ratio of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99,  = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

We were able to decrease patient exposure to QTc prolonging medications while not increasing the rate of QTc prolongation as well as improving alert action rate. Additionally, there was a decrease in QTc prolonging medication orders which illustrates the benefit of using a validated risk score with a customized CDS approach compared with a traditional vendor-based strategy. Further research is needed to confirm if an approach implemented at our organization can reduce QTc prolongation rates.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在为住院患者实施电子病历中定制的 QTc 间期临床决策支持(CDS)警报策略,并针对以下目标的提供者:最小化 QTc 延长,最小化暴露于 QTc 延长药物,减少整体 QTc 相关警报。实施了一种基于经过验证的 QTc 风险评分工具并以定制的 QTc 延长警报替代药物知识供应商警报的策略。

方法

这是一项回顾性准实验研究,包括干预前(2019 年 8 月至 2019 年 10 月)和干预后(2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 2 月)两个阶段。定制警报于 2019 年 11 月实施。

结果

在实施前组中,有 361 名(19.3%)患者发生 QTc 延长,在实施后组中,有 357 名(19.6%)患者发生 QTc 延长(OR:1.02,95%CI:0.87-1.20, = 0.81)。与实施前相比,实施后的行动可能性比为 18.90(95%CI:14.03-25.47,<0.001)。与 QTc 延长药物的总订单数也从 7921(5.5%)下降到 7566(5.3%),比值比为 0.96(95%CI:0.93-0.99, = 0.01)。

结论

我们能够降低患者暴露于 QTc 延长药物的风险,同时不会增加 QTc 延长的发生率,并且提高了警报行动率。此外,还减少了 QTc 延长药物的订单数量,这说明了与传统的供应商策略相比,使用经过验证的风险评分和定制的 CDS 方法的好处。需要进一步的研究来确认我们组织实施的方法是否可以降低 QTc 延长率。

相似文献

1
Effect of Replacing Vendor QTc Alerts with a Custom QTc Risk Alert in Inpatients.替换供应商 QTc 警报与定制 QTc 风险警报在住院患者中的效果。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):19-29. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740483. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
2
Impact of a clinical decision support tool targeting QT-prolonging medications.针对延长 QT 间期药物的临床决策支持工具的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Nov 16;77(Supplement_4):S111-S117. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa269.
3
Effectiveness of a clinical decision support system for reducing the risk of QT interval prolongation in hospitalized patients.一种临床决策支持系统在降低住院患者QT间期延长风险方面的有效性。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 May;7(3):381-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000651. Epub 2014 May 6.
4
Comparison of two algorithms to support medication surveillance for drug-drug interactions between QTc-prolonging drugs.比较两种算法以支持 QTc 延长药物相互作用的药物监测。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jan;145:104329. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104329. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
5
Predictive Analytics for Identification of Patients at Risk for QT Interval Prolongation: A Systematic Review.预测分析在识别 QT 间期延长风险患者中的应用:系统综述。
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Aug;38(8):813-821. doi: 10.1002/phar.2146. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
6
Providers' Response to Clinical Decision Support for QT Prolonging Drugs.医疗服务提供者对延长QT间期药物临床决策支持的反应。
J Med Syst. 2017 Sep 2;41(10):161. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0803-7.
7
A Calculated Risk: Evaluation of QTc Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Alerts and Performance of the Tisdale Risk Score Calculator.一项有计划的风险:QTc 药物-药物相互作用(DDI)临床决策支持(CDS)警报评估以及 Tisdale 风险评分计算器的性能。
Drug Saf. 2024 Dec;47(12):1235-1243. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01466-w. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
8
Development of a risk model for predicting QTc interval prolongation in patients using QTc-prolonging drugs.用于预测使用可延长QTc间期药物的患者QTc间期延长的风险模型的开发。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1372-1379. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0692-y. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
9
Institution-wide QT alert system identifies patients with a high risk of mortality.全机构范围的 QT 警报系统识别出具有高死亡率风险的患者。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Apr;88(4):315-25. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.01.013.
10
Clinically relevant QTc prolongation due to overridden drug-drug interaction alerts: a retrospective cohort study.因药物相互作用警报被忽略导致的具有临床相关性的QTc延长:一项回顾性队列研究
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Mar;67(3):347-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03357.x. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Stratification of QTc Prolongations in Hospitalized Cardiology and Gastroenterology Patients Using the Tisdale Score-A Retrospective Analysis.使用蒂斯代尔评分对住院心脏病学和胃肠病学患者QTc延长进行风险分层——一项回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 8;14(2):339. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020339.
2
Determining sensitivity and specificity of risk scores for QTc interval prolongation in hemato-oncology patients prescribed systemic antifungal therapy: a retrospective cross-sectional study.评估血液肿瘤患者接受全身抗真菌治疗时 QTc 间期延长风险评分的灵敏度和特异性:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Dec;46(6):1436-1444. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01788-w. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
3
A Calculated Risk: Evaluation of QTc Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Alerts and Performance of the Tisdale Risk Score Calculator.一项有计划的风险:QTc 药物-药物相互作用(DDI)临床决策支持(CDS)警报评估以及 Tisdale 风险评分计算器的性能。
Drug Saf. 2024 Dec;47(12):1235-1243. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01466-w. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
Sustained Effect of Clinical Decision Support for Heart Failure: A Natural Experiment Using Implementation Science.临床心力衰竭决策支持的持续效果:应用实施科学的自然实验。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Oct;14(5):822-832. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775566. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
5
Real-Time User Feedback to Support Clinical Decision Support System Improvement.实时用户反馈支持临床决策支持系统的改进。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Oct;13(5):1024-1032. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757923. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of a clinical decision support tool targeting QT-prolonging medications.针对延长 QT 间期药物的临床决策支持工具的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Nov 16;77(Supplement_4):S111-S117. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa269.
2
Clinician Perceptions of Timing and Presentation of Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts.临床医生对药物相互作用警报的时间和呈现方式的看法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 May;11(3):487-496. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714276. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
3
The Effect of Eliminating Intermediate Severity Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts on Overall Medication Alert Burden and Acceptance Rate.消除中度药物相互作用警报对总体药物警报负担和接受率的影响。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Oct;10(5):927-934. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400447. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
4
Risk factors for QTc interval prolongation.QTc间期延长的危险因素。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Feb;74(2):183-191. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2381-5. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
5
Providers' Response to Clinical Decision Support for QT Prolonging Drugs.医疗服务提供者对延长QT间期药物临床决策支持的反应。
J Med Syst. 2017 Sep 2;41(10):161. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0803-7.
6
Recommendations to improve the usability of drug-drug interaction clinical decision support alerts.改善药物相互作用临床决策支持警报可用性的建议。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Nov;22(6):1243-50. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv011. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
7
Impact of clinical decision support preventing the use of QT-prolonging medications for patients at risk for torsade de pointes.临床决策支持对预防尖端扭转型室性心动过速风险患者使用延长QT间期药物的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Apr;22(e1):e21-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002896. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
8
Drug interaction alert override rates in the Meaningful Use era: no evidence of progress.有意义使用时代的药物相互作用警报忽略率:无进展证据。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Sep 3;5(3):802-13. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-12-RA-0103. eCollection 2014.
9
Effectiveness of a clinical decision support system for reducing the risk of QT interval prolongation in hospitalized patients.一种临床决策支持系统在降低住院患者QT间期延长风险方面的有效性。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 May;7(3):381-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000651. Epub 2014 May 6.
10
Development and validation of a risk score to predict QT interval prolongation in hospitalized patients.预测住院患者QT间期延长风险评分的开发与验证
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jul;6(4):479-87. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000152. Epub 2013 May 28.