Moshoeshoe R J, Enslin G M, Katerere D R
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Private bag X640, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 Jan 5;15(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40545-021-00387-8.
Substandard and Falsified (SF) medical products are a growing global concern. They harm the individual patient, the healthcare system and the economy. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has highlighted contributing factors globally: insufficient national medicine regulation, poor enforcement of existing legislation, weak stakeholder collaboration and the rise of novel viruses, such as the COVID-19. The study aimed to assess the legislative and policy framework and institutional relationships governing pharmaceuticals and anti-counterfeiting strategies.
The study was explorative and consisted of two phases. The first phase was between 2016 and 2017. It looked at document analysis (annual reports and press releases from 2011 to 2016) from government institutions involved in medicines regulation and law enforcement for SF seizure reports between 2004 and 2017. The second phase was between 2016 and 2018 through in-depth semi-structured interviews (seven in total) with selected stakeholders.
First Phase-the data collected and reported by various departments was sporadic and did not always correlate for the same periods indicating, a lack of a central reporting system and stakeholder collaboration. In South Africa, counterfeiting of medicines mainly involves the smuggling of non-registered goods. The most common counterfeit items were painkillers, herbal teas, herbal ointments, while some were medical devices. Furthermore, Customs identified South Africa as a transhipment point for SF infiltration to neighbouring countries with less robust regulatory systems. Second phase-interview transcripts were analysed by thematic coding. These were identified as the adequacy of legislation, institutional capacity, enforcement and post-market surveillance, stakeholder collaboration and information sharing, and public education and awareness.
Document analysis and interviews indicate that South Africa already has a national drug policy and legislative framework consistent with international law. However, there is no specific pharmaceutical legislation addressing the counterfeiting of medicines. Law enforcement has also been complicated by poor stakeholder engagement and information sharing.
不合格和伪造的(SF)医疗产品日益引起全球关注。它们损害个体患者、医疗保健系统和经济。世界卫生组织(WHO)强调了全球范围内的促成因素:国家药品监管不足、现有立法执行不力、利益相关者协作薄弱以及新型病毒(如COVID-19)的出现。该研究旨在评估管理药品和防伪策略的立法和政策框架以及机构关系。
该研究具有探索性,包括两个阶段。第一阶段在2016年至2017年之间。它审查了参与药品监管和执法的政府机构的文件分析(2011年至2016年的年度报告和新闻稿),以获取2004年至2017年期间SF缉获报告。第二阶段在2016年至2018年之间,通过对选定的利益相关者进行深入的半结构化访谈(共七次)。
第一阶段——各部门收集和报告的数据是零散的,并且在同一时期并不总是相关,这表明缺乏中央报告系统和利益相关者协作。在南非,药品造假主要涉及走私未注册商品。最常见的假冒物品是止痛药、花草茶、草药软膏,还有一些是医疗设备。此外,海关确定南非是SF渗透到监管系统较弱的邻国的转运点。第二阶段——访谈记录通过主题编码进行分析。这些被确定为立法的充分性、机构能力、执法和上市后监测、利益相关者协作和信息共享以及公众教育和意识。
文件分析和访谈表明,南非已经有了与国际法一致的国家药品政策和立法框架。然而,没有专门针对药品造假的药品立法。利益相关者参与度低和信息共享也使执法变得复杂。