School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 5;12(1):e055475. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055475.
In response to growing pressures on healthcare systems, the advanced clinical practice (ACP) role has been implemented widely in the UK and internationally. In England, ACP is a level of practice applicable across various healthcare professions, who exercise a level of autonomy across four domains, referred to as the four pillars of practice (education, leadership, research and clinical practice). A national framework for ACP was established in 2017 to ensure consistency across the ACP role, however current ACP governance, education and support is yet to be evaluated. This study aimed to analyse data from a national survey of the ACP role to inform the development and improvement of policies relating to ACP in the National Health Service (NHS) in England.
A cross-sectional survey with free-text comments.
The survey was distributed across primary and secondary levels of care to three distinct groups in England, including individual ACPs, NHS provider organisations and Trusts and primary care settings.
A total of 4365 surveys were returned, from ACP staff (n=4013), NHS provider organisations and Trusts (n=166) and primary care organisations (n=186).
Considerable variation was found in role titles, scope of practice, job descriptions and educational backgrounds of ACPs. Differing approaches to governance were noted, which led to inconsistent ACP frameworks in some organisations. A further challenge highlighted included committing time to work across the four pillars of advanced practice, particularly the research pillar. ACPs called for improvements in supervision and continuing professional development alongside further support in navigating career pathways.
A standardised approach may support ACP workforce development in England and enable ACPs to work across the four pillars of practice. Due to the wide uptake of ACP roles internationally, this study has relevance across professions for global healthcare workforce transformation.
为应对医疗体系日益增长的压力,高级临床实践(ACP)角色在英国和国际上得到了广泛应用。在英格兰,ACP 是一种适用于各种医疗保健专业的实践水平,在四个领域中行使一定程度的自主权,这四个领域被称为实践的四大支柱(教育、领导、研究和临床实践)。2017 年建立了国家 ACP 框架,以确保 ACP 角色的一致性,但目前 ACP 的治理、教育和支持尚未得到评估。本研究旨在分析全国范围内 ACP 角色调查的数据,为改善英格兰国民保健服务(NHS)中与 ACP 相关的政策提供信息。
横断面调查,附有自由文本评论。
该调查在英格兰的初级和二级医疗保健机构中向三个不同群体分发,包括个体 ACP、NHS 提供者组织和信托基金以及初级保健机构。
共收回 4365 份调查,来自 ACP 工作人员(n=4013)、NHS 提供者组织和信托基金(n=166)和初级保健组织(n=186)。
发现 ACP 的职位头衔、实践范围、工作描述和教育背景存在相当大的差异。注意到治理方法存在差异,这导致一些组织的 ACP 框架不一致。另一个突出的挑战是,要投入时间在高级实践的四大支柱上工作,特别是研究支柱。ACP 呼吁改善监督和持续专业发展,同时在职业道路上提供更多支持。
标准化方法可能会支持英格兰的 ACP 劳动力发展,并使 ACP 能够在实践的四大支柱上工作。由于 ACP 角色在国际上的广泛采用,这项研究对全球医疗保健劳动力转型具有跨专业的相关性。