Britton Carolina, Walker David, Griffin Ann, Freeth Della
Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
Theatres & Anaesthesia, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):e087915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087915.
An ageing population and a workforce crisis have triggered an ambitious UK strategy for sustained delivery of healthcare. In perioperative care (the management of patients from contemplation of surgery until full recovery), it is recognised that interventions are needed to place the workforce on a more sustainable footing through cross-functionality and skill-shifting, namely with advanced practice roles. However, despite some reports and reviews in the literature, it is unclear how skills development efforts may potentially support workforce transformation for an effective and resilient perioperative care workforce. Thus, drawing causal inferences for policy-making that is both evidence based and rooted in theory is challenging. A scoping review, reported within this protocol, confirmed that 'poly-skilling' and 'advanced practice roles' are critical to this workforce transformation, but the mechanisms through which interventions in this area may work are not understood. A synthesis of evidence is, therefore, proposed in this protocol, to understand what works for whom and under what circumstances, in relation to poly-skilling and advanced practice roles in workforce transformation for sustained healthcare delivery.
This protocol sets out the plan to undertake a realist synthesis of the related literature, with theory elicitation (step 1), search for empirical evidence (step 2), selection and appraisal of evidence (step 3) and programme theory refinement (step 4). Exploratory reviews of the literature and key informants' inputs will produce initial hypotheses as to what it is about interventions in poly-skilling and advanced practice roles that work and why. Data from the literature will then be collected based on relevance, rigour and richness. The iterative analysis and synthesis of these data will produce causal links between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. The results will inform a realist evaluation, to be undertaken as part of doctoral research, to better understand the mechanisms that support workforce transformation through poly-skilling and advanced practice roles.
As a review of previously published literature, the evidence synthesis proposed in this protocol does not require formal ethical approval. Recommended ethical considerations regarding the involvement of key informants, who are not study participants but a consultative group, are presented in this protocol. A formal ethics approval will be sought ahead of the later empirical stage of the research. The results of the realist synthesis proposed in this protocol will be fed back to the local National Health Service organisation and Integrated Care Board and disseminated to the research community via presentations at conferences and a peer-reviewed journal article.
CRD42024512164.
人口老龄化和劳动力危机引发了英国一项宏伟的持续提供医疗保健服务的战略。在围手术期护理(即对从考虑手术到完全康复的患者的管理)中,人们认识到需要采取干预措施,通过跨职能和技能转移,即设置高级实践角色,使劳动力更具可持续性。然而,尽管文献中有一些报告和综述,但尚不清楚技能发展努力如何可能支持围手术期护理劳动力的转型,以形成一支有效且有韧性的劳动力队伍。因此,为基于证据且扎根于理论的政策制定得出因果推论具有挑战性。本方案中报告的一项范围综述证实,“多技能化”和“高级实践角色”对于这一劳动力转型至关重要,但该领域干预措施可能发挥作用的机制尚不清楚。因此,本方案提出进行证据综合,以了解在持续医疗保健服务的劳动力转型中,就多技能化和高级实践角色而言,什么对谁有效以及在何种情况下有效。
本方案阐述了对相关文献进行现实主义综合分析的计划,包括理论引出(步骤1)、实证证据搜索(步骤2)、证据选择与评估(步骤3)以及方案理论完善(步骤4)。对文献的探索性综述和关键信息提供者的意见将产生关于多技能化和高级实践角色干预措施的作用及原因的初步假设。然后将根据相关性、严谨性和丰富性收集文献数据。对这些数据进行迭代分析和综合将得出背景、机制和结果之间的因果联系。研究结果将为一项现实主义评估提供信息,该评估将作为博士研究的一部分进行,以更好地理解通过多技能化和高级实践角色支持劳动力转型的机制。
作为对先前发表文献的综述,本方案中提出的证据综合不需要正式的伦理批准。本方案中提出了关于关键信息提供者参与的推荐伦理考量,他们不是研究参与者,而是一个咨询小组。在研究的后续实证阶段之前将寻求正式的伦理批准。本方案中提出的现实主义综合分析结果将反馈给当地的国民医疗服务体系组织和综合护理委员会,并通过在会议上的报告和同行评审期刊文章传播给研究界。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024512164。