Wake Mark, Green William
ENT, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
College of Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, School of Business, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 17;9(7):e026472. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026472.
This research explores measures of employee engagement in the National Health Service (NHS) acute Trusts in England and examines the association between organisation-level engagement scores and quality ratings by the Care Quality Commission (CQC).
Cross-sectional.
97 acute NHS Trusts in England.
97 NHS acute Trusts in England (2012-2016). Data include provider details, staff survey results and CQC reports. Hybrid Trusts or organisations affected by recent mergers are excluded.
Analysis uses organisation-level employee engagement and CQC quality ratings.
Employee engagement is affected by organisational factors, including patient bed numbers (β=-0.46, p<0.05) and financial revenue (β=0.38, p<0.05). CQC ratings are predicted by overall employee engagement score (β=0.57, p<0.001) and financial deficit (β=-0.19, p<0.05). The most influential employee engagement dimension on provider ratings is 'advocacy' (λ=0.54, p<0.001). Analysis supports the notion that employee engagement can be predicted from advocacy scores alone (eigenvalue=4.03). Better still, combining advocacy scores from the previous year's survey or adding in motivation scores is a highly reliable indication of overall employee engagement (95.4% of total variance).
NHS acute Trusts with high employee engagement scores tend to have better CQC ratings. Trusts with a high financial deficit tend to have lower ratings. Employee engagement subdimensions have different associations with CQC ratings, the most influential dimension being advocacy score. A two subdimension model of engagement efficiently predicts overall employee engagement in NHS acute Trusts in England. Healthcare leaders should pay close attention to the proportion of employees who would recommend their organisation as a place to work or receive treatment, because this is a proxy for the level of engagement, and it predicts CQC ratings.
本研究探讨了英格兰国民健康服务体系(NHS)急性病信托机构中员工敬业度的衡量方法,并检验了组织层面的敬业度得分与护理质量委员会(CQC)的质量评级之间的关联。
横断面研究。
英格兰的97家NHS急性病信托机构。
英格兰的97家NHS急性病信托机构(2012 - 2016年)。数据包括提供者详细信息、员工调查结果和CQC报告。混合型信托机构或受近期合并影响的组织被排除在外。
分析采用组织层面的员工敬业度和CQC质量评级。
员工敬业度受组织因素影响,包括病床数量(β = -0.46,p < 0.05)和财政收入(β = 0.38,p < 0.05)。CQC评级由员工总体敬业度得分(β = 0.57,p < 0.001)和财政赤字(β = -0.19,p < 0.05)预测。对提供者评级影响最大的员工敬业度维度是“倡导”(λ = 0.54,p < 0.001)。分析支持仅根据倡导得分就能预测员工敬业度这一观点(特征值 = 4.03)。更妙的是,结合上一年度调查的倡导得分或加入动机得分是员工总体敬业度的高度可靠指标(占总方差的95.4%)。
员工敬业度得分高的NHS急性病信托机构往往有更好的CQC评级。财政赤字高的信托机构评级往往较低。员工敬业度子维度与CQC评级有不同的关联,最具影响力的维度是倡导得分。一个双维度敬业度模型能有效预测英格兰NHS急性病信托机构中的员工总体敬业度。医疗保健领导者应密切关注愿意推荐其所在组织作为工作或接受治疗场所的员工比例,因为这是敬业度水平的一个指标,且能预测CQC评级。